Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Draft Day 3 General Discussion


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Monrowed said:

So are you suggesting that teams trade down and only draft in the 6th round? To me it is suggesting that the scout team is not good at their jobs… This is a risk averse approach. I will give them the benefit of the doubt this year since COVID limited the amount of tape for this years picks. In future years I would rather trust the scout team to do their jobs and target the correct players for each round.

No I'm suggesting talent is all over the draft and the more swings you have the better chance you have at drafting them.. 

Also this opinion is off due to the fact You nor I know how their board is stacked up and where "they" had these players ranked.. You basing your opinion on who you think they should have drafted based on your non professional knowledge of who they really scouted and who they wanted..

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, xoxoDeebo98 said:

that's so dumb you say it's not true when it's a 3 second google search to bring up the stats on day 3 picks

It also depends on the amount of talent in each draft. Not every draft is the same. If one draft lacks it, you try to trade up within reason. If the draft has plenty, then you can accumulate more picks. Stop being a Neanderthal. 

  • Flames 2
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, KillerKat said:

It also depends on the amount of talent in each draft. Not every draft is the same. If one draft lacks it, you try to trade up within reason. If the draft has plenty, then you can accumulate more picks. Stop being a Neanderthal. 

I think we found Chuck again.

  • Pie 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'd hold on to Walker - we have no OT depth at all. Freeling is a block of clay - all the tools are there and he appears to have a great attitude. He needs serious work on his technique to realise his potential though.
    • From my watch last night: They weren't trading out of 19 unless it was a daft offer once Freeling got there. They were clearly antsy to get Hunter - and Minnesota actually called to offer the trade down. They weren't trading out of the third round pick once Brazzell fell to it (and Canales would have been happy with him in the second round). They traded back a lot on Day 3 - even if Morgan 'Babe Ruth'd' it with Lee, Hecht and Wheatley; they clearly weren't the only guys they would have taken at those picks. I'm curious to know which player caused the reaction at the start of day 2 (Dan Morgan): "of course they'd pick him"
    • Watching this confirms that this staff and front office is super high on Monroe Freeling. I wouldn't be surprised if he's gotta a real chance to win the starting LT job in camp. If he does, we can look to flip Rasheed Walker to a contender desperate for tackle help.   As for Ickey I still really like him and wanna extend him but based on how the staff was talking about Freeling it might be time for ickey to start taking some practice sets at guard if he wants to stay here as we are gonna have to have figure out a solution for the contracts of Lewis and Hunt.  My preferred scenario for the Oline in 2027 is Freeling-Ickey-Hech-Lewis-Moton. 
×
×
  • Create New...