Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2021 NFL strength of schedule rankings


NAS
 Share

Recommended Posts

Panthers at 26th, but how in the hell do the Bucs get 29th after winning the superbowl?

https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/2021-nfl-strength-of-schedule-ranking-for-all-32-teams-heading-into-the-nfls-inaugural-17-game-season/

Here's the 2021 strength of schedule rankings for each team (combined 2020 record of all 17 opponents, combined winning percentage).   

RANK   OPPONENTS' COMBINED 2020 RECORD OPPONENTS' COMBINED 2020 WIN PERCENTAGE

1

Steelers

155-115-2

.574

2

Ravens

152-118-2

.563

3

Bears

149-122-1

.550

4

Packers

147-124-1

.542

5

Vikings

144-127-1

.531

T-6

Bengals

144-128

.529

T-6

Lions

143-127-2

.529

8

Raiders

142-128-2

.526

9

Browns

140-130-2

.518

10

Rams    

140-132

.515

T-11

Chiefs

138-132-2

.511

T-11

Seahawks

139-133

.511

T-13

Titans

138-134      

.507

T-13

Cardinals

138-134

.507

T-15

Washington

136-134-2

.504

T-15

Texans

137-135

.504

17

Chargers

133-137-2

.493

18

Jaguars

133-138-1

.491

T-19

49ers

132-138-2

.489

T-19

Jets

132-138-2

.489

T-19

Patriots

133-139

.489

22

Saints

131-140-1

.483

T-23

Bills

130-142

.478

T-23

Colts

130-142

.478

25

Giants

128-142-2

.474

26

Panthers

128-143-1

.472

T-27

Broncos

127-143-2

.471

T-27

Dolphins

128-144

.471

29

Buccaneers

126-145-1

.465

30

Falcons

123-148-1

.454

31   

Cowboys

122-148-2

.452

32

Eagles

117-155

.430

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Basically agree.  He is the one of that bunch that offers upgraded pass catching along with he is supposed to be kind of special.   Then you have the OL and the ideas that if they perform you can have JAG backs and still do well. So okay we could be fine.  But Brooks is important and to me that receiving element sets him apart.  So there sure is something riding on him.     What strikes me as incongruent is people over in Atlanta or those that follow them look at Penix with a third surgery and act like it is no big deal.      And we are on pins and needles over Brooks.  Either they should worry a lot more or we should worry a lot less.  
    • I usually go a game or two optimist over the consensus here but this is too early for me to say. I need to see some players on the field.  I am not feeling real optimistic though.  
    • Okay as a ‘take CJ’ fan I actually don’t obsess over CJ and Houston, contrary to the narrative.  But I thought I picked up some noise that his OL left a lot to be desired.    Not a single Beyce supporter would judge him harshly if he had a crappy OL. We all know that.    So be fair about it.  A QB needs to be protected.  Especially a guy that gets to his spot and wants to finish the play from there. Which CJ is.  
×
×
  • Create New...