Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Question for the cap guys


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

28 minutes ago, NYPantherFan said:

I like OTC better and one of these guys is a decent follow on Twitter. That said, I always see the mainstream writers reference Spotrac

FWIW, a lot of main stream writers are full of poo!

EDIT: That being said, I like the look of Spotrac better. No idea about accuracy.

Edited by shaqattaq
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've looked at them both, but find Spotrac easier to navigate.  I think OTC is probably quicker on the draw when something changes.

I have read that Spotrac grabs data from OTC (as well as other sources, and I believe they cite or link to OTC when they do).  Keep in mind, Spotrac is trying to cover all sports while OTC concentrates just on the NFL.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Basbear said:

Neither. 

The best and only one used for cap stuff is - https://nflpa.com/reports/public-salary-cap-report

 

Like the 18th time Ive been trying to tell folks. Thats the official one, it does lag behind OTC and sportac, buts its the only one thats accurate.  

That doesn't have player contract breakdowns, however. Agreed it is probably the most accurate but has nothing about what people are usually referencing which is player contract info.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

That doesn't have player contract breakdowns, however. Agreed it is probably the most accurate but has nothing about what people are usually referencing which is player contract info.

Exactly. Just a number with no context as to how it came to be that way. OTC is the more consistently accurate of the two. The Matt Kalil contract was a complete mess on Sportrac. But  the guy writing for OTC wanted to pay Kalil 7M more so I question his knowledge as well. Now that they have every scenario mapped out, it’s fairly easy to judge any move for yourself. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • By all indications, the surgery was "minor." I know with all surgeries and especially back surgery there can be complications, but I think the whole time Tremble did this with the expectation he would be able to be back for Week 1 It sounds like he will be ready to start back in team drills next week. He's a veteran who knows the system so I'm sure that helps. I still can't imagine he will play a normal workload early on though 
    • Maybe. He was pretty good in college before a bad injury. He had a good preseason last year as a UDFA in Washington and was on their practice squad all year so they obviously saw something worth developing. He signed a futures deal with the Panthers earlier this year, and everything about him has been increasingly positive. Tremayne has gotten a decent amount of time with the ones, and a lot with the twos for someone that doesn't have a chance. He's the only other 6'4" plus WR on the team, plays ST, and is a more natural backup to the X receiver position than David Moore. That was my thinking behind it. But he may well end up as one of the last roster cuts. If so, I do hope they can bring him back to the PS. But I personally think there's a good chance he could be claimed given his ST ability and what hes shown at WR.
    • That was my thought originally, but so many of the beat writers have mentioned keeping 7 WRs in conversations that I went with that, at least for the purposes of this projection. But you're right that historically defensive guys who were standouts at ST have tradionally gotten those last spots  
×
×
  • Create New...