Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Jones trade talks heating up


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, PootieNunu said:

I believe it is as well. I don't think anyone is giving up a 1st rounder for a 32 year old overpaid receiver. 

What will he realistically add to an offense? 800-1000 yards and 5 or 6 touchdowns for maybe 2 years if that?

He has scored 8 or more touchdowns 4 times over a ten year career and only started all 16 games 3 times.

Anything more than a late 2nd round pick is too much. I think a third is more likely. 

If a 3rd is all it takes for Julio, sign us up. He's worth that even at his salary. 

Its 50/50 he moves even if he wants to. Falcons can't really just throw him away for only a 2nd really, but that contract and age bit makes it tough to take him back for a 1st unless you really have room and the team to make a SB run.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, chbright said:

If a 3rd is all it takes for Julio, sign us up. He's worth that even at his salary. 

Its 50/50 he moves even if he wants to. Falcons can't really just throw him away for only a 2nd really, but that contract and age bit makes it tough to take him back for a 1st unless you really have room and the team to make a SB run.

Does he really move the needle for a super bowl run? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Falcons likely don't feel that converting a portion of Jones' 2021 salary into signing bonus before a trade to lessen the cap hit for the acquiring team like the Panthers did with  Teddy Bridgewater is warranted given their own cap problems.

Obviously, teams could create cap room by restructuring contracts in order to be in position to handle Jones' 2021 salary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, SizzleBuzz said:

Does Julio have a "no-trade" clause in his contract like Watson does?

(a useless clause for a player trying to bust out of their perceived jail...LOL)

 

A two second google shows he does not have a no trade clause. 

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, joemac said:

Absolutely. Especially for a team like GB, SF or Tenn.

I just don't see him as some great upgrade that a team must have. 

He would be a #1 for SF, but I am not sure they are a legitimate contender.

For GB or Tenn he would be a #2 so he might help them more with less coverage on him. 

I guess he will be nice to have between the 20s but he has never been dominate in the red zone, i dont see him putting any team over the top. 

Will he be a nice complimentary piece? Sure.

Ultimately ATL wants a 1st for him, i dont think they get that unless a team is desperate. 

 

Edited by PootieNunu
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...