Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Loki


CRA
 Share

Recommended Posts

13 hours ago, Zod said:

I am loving all this Marvel content. Now if I could only get the girlfriend up to speed quickly without days worth of movies. 

Conversely, it sounds like the perfect excuse to spend days watching past movies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh man, I've enjoyed the heck out of these two episodes!  I loved how seeing the "paper weights" completely deflated Loki!

So good, so interesting!  Though I've been seeing a lot of chatter about how the TVA is pretty evil, which kind of makes sense.  I can't wait to see what happens!   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Spoilers: if I had to guess a certain time keeper lady is Lady Loki. I had my suspicions before but now it’s the only plausible explanation outside of Kang showing up. 
 

Also if I’m not mistaken Loki(2) still has a projection out there somewhere. I need to go back and rewatch episode 3 to make sure. 

Edited by Harbingers
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Harbingers said:

Spoilers: if I had to guess a certain time keeper lady is Lady Loki. I had my suspicions before but now it’s the only plausible explanation outside of Kang showing up. 
 

Also if I’m not mistaken Loki(2) still has a projection out there somewhere. I need to go back and rewatch episode 3 to make sure. 

SPOILER

I hadn't thought about that until you said it.  But yeah, it would make sense if she was Loki variant now that I think about it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Trade up for a project was dumb, he's gonna be 25 next month. By the time you're deciding on whether he's worth the 5th year option or a big contract you're already gonna be thinking about moving on soon either way.  
    • I mean this is legit AF statement....you don't spend that draft capital on a project just like you don't trade up for an injured RB either, which was done in the same draft.  That draft IMO was a necessary evil for DM to learn from his mistakes (I think he did but some may not). Also I have to mention I'm a big Coker fan and think getting him as an UDFA was obv a steal.  Coker is the better WR2 at this point as Legette and its not even debatable unfortunately.  Give him year 3 but don't expect much from him.  Continue in the offseason with adding as much talent and competition on the roster as possible including WR.  Or just trade his ass for peanuts and continue to build roster by any means.......  
    • Losing him was a huge loss. Look at how the Bears went from a 5 win team to now a 11 win team. The Lions offensive line is bad this year, secondary is bad and Campbell going for it on 4th down all the time has cost them games instead of taking the Field Goals. Goff is inconsistent as well.
×
×
  • Create New...