Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Pro Football Network ranks the offensive lines


Captain Morgan
 Share

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, JawnyBlaze said:

Didn’t address the OL? Lost all credibility right there. We drafted a couple OL, both of whom have a lot of potential

I know right?

I don't understand why some people want to dis on Brady before pads are even on. 

He has the tape, the highest pff rate for a drafted college olineman in history,  the lowest pressure rate in the draft, a awesome RAS, and experience against a 1st rounder DE and a few P5 schools.  I understand his arms are short, but I just don't get why all these rankings didn't assume him for LT.   

Its all just paper now and they refuse to look at his paper.

They assumes the rookies beat the vets on other teams.

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

I think there's a very real possibility they're going to try Taylor Moton on the left and look for the best possible option on the right.

Could be Christensen, could be Erving, maybe even Scott or Daley if he can stay healthy.

I wonder if Fitterer is keeping up with Morgan Moses. If they extend Moton, they could use the cap savings to help bring in Moses on a 2ish year deal. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, frankw said:

Well if Darnold is running for his life come October we will be sure to revisit this.

That doesn’t change there not being a good option beside Sewell in the draft. Christensen might be as good as any other option after him. It’s basically the same line as last year which was just below average. Okung played less than half the time and Scott played serviceable. So Erving will compete with Scott and if he wins the job he is more than likely the better option. Miller, Daley, Paradis, and Moton were all there last year. Now we have Christensen to either take a guard spot or possibly RT if Moton goes LT. It’s not great but not terrible. Moton, Erving/Daley/Elf, Paradis, Miller, Christensen doesn’t seem bad with Brown possibly competing for a guard spot as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ForJimmy said:

That doesn’t change there not being a good option beside Sewell in the draft. Christensen might be as good as any other option after him. It’s basically the same line as last year which was just below average. Okung played less than half the time and Scott played serviceable. So Erving will compete with Scott and if he wins the job he is more than likely the better option. Miller, Daley, Paradis, and Moton were all there last year. Now we have Christensen to either take a guard spot or possibly RT if Moton goes LT. It’s not great but not terrible. Moton, Erving/Daley/Elf, Paradis, Miller, Christensen doesn’t seem bad with Brown possibly competing for a guard spot as well.

Christensen could be good or he could be another Little it is a crapshoot regardless of this analytics we are being sold. Well in truth all we have right now is a hope that Moton may slide to the left. We have no confirmation that he wants to let alone that he will be comfortable there long term. Even if that does happen he will want to be paid for that position and if we do and it doesn't work out where does that leave us? Another albatross contract? There are still a lot of unknowns rn.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, frankw said:

With a void at left tackle once again until proven otherwise this is hard to argue with. Our starting center was complained about to no end last year. Our depth isn't much better either. But homers gonna homer.

Taylor Moton might be the NFL’s best right tackle, if not the most underrated one. We  also have a pair of respectable projected starters at right guard and center with John Miller and Matt Paradis. The left side of the line is where things get really dicey.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

I think not enough credit is being given to Brady and Teddy for how "not that terrible" the Panthers OL looked last year. 

 

I fully agree and this 2021 season will be another year the OL coaches will have to excel if we are to have a halfway decent OL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, frankw said:

Christensen could be good or he could be another Little it is a crapshoot regardless of this analytics we are being sold. Well in truth all we have right now is a hope that Moton may slide to the left. We have no confirmation that he wants to let alone that he will be comfortable there long term. Even if that does happen he will want to be paid for that position and if we do and it doesn't work out where does that leave us? Another albatross contract? There are still a lot of unknowns rn.

Yeah he could be another Little, but people can’t complain we don’t draft any and then say they could be the next Little when we do. What exactly is our staff suppose to do? We brought it some average to below FAs to compete and drafted young players in Christensen and Brown while also drafting Tremble to help with blocking.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, JawnyBlaze said:

Didn’t address the OL? Lost all credibility right there. We drafted a couple OL, both of whom have a lot of potential

yeah, but in fairness....you can't really call a 6th rounder investing in the OL.   Doesn't mean it can't work out.  But if you have a weak OL no one is going to give you a thumbs up when half your investment was in round 6. 

I think playcalling and Sam's ability to execute will ultimately determine how bad the OL is.  I think the majority of OLs are in the same tier.  Subpar.  QBs and playcalling have a lot to do with how the cluster of OLs ultimately gets viewed. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It will be really interesting to see how both sides handle this. I'm sure the team would love to get him signed to a 4 year deal based on his output so far and some potential factored in, i.e. something like a 4 year $30 million contract.  But I could see his agent telling him the best path is to take the one year offer, put up a big year next year and then really cash in. The team also has to keep in mind T-Mac's 2nd contract, which likely will happen after the 2027 season assuming he keeps improving as expected.  Even if we could get him on a budget 4 year deal for what he could become, the problem then becomes when he wants to re-negotiate in 2 years during the same summer we will extend T-Mac, and you don't want to spend that much on WRs in one offseason, just see the Bengals this last year. Taking everything into consideration, I'm thinking the 1 year deal and then getting him to sign a 4-5 year deal after hopefully say a 800ish yard season next year might be best for our cap situation and separate his and T-Mac's negotiation periods.
    • And yet jax made it no further than we did, and its very possible the Pats don't either. I think it speaks more to the overall down year for the nfl as far as having great/dominant teams, every team this year has fatal flaws that can be exploited 
    • Ehhh I agree the nfc is stronger this year but their really werent any truly dominant teams this year everyone is flawed, I think the narrative for the NFL this year will to try ahd force a Josh Allen SB win
×
×
  • Create New...