Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

"You can't judge somebody based off of sacks"


Icege
 Share

Recommended Posts

Good analysis.

The hardest thing about measuring football performance by stats is that there are so many things you just can't quantify. How nervous a particular lineman makes an opposing quarterback is one example.

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Good analysis.

The hardest thing about measuring football performance by stats is that there are so many things you just can't quantify. How nervous a particular lineman makes an opposing quarterback is one example.

Yeah.  I'd like us to lead the league in unnerving qbs.

  • Pie 2
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There was an interview this off-season with Luke, posted on this forum. I think he stated he thought Tackle for loss was an underrated stat.

I think Reddick ended up top 5 in that stat. 

Is that worth to be included? 

What stats did the rookies have in college? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Preventing points and being part of preventing points is what matters. The defense being affective is what matters. Individual production is what we can easily quantify or be exited about. However, it all needs to combine to prevent points. 

I'm encouraged it will. 

Edited by Moo Daeng
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does it count as a pressure if an edge rusher flushes a QB from the pocket and completes a TD?

As far as unnerving the QB, I guarantee you the guys that put the QB on his ass are more effective at it. 

Sacks are overrated as far as evaluating DT productivity. Edge rushers not so much imo.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As a team last year, our pass rush win rate was pretty good at 12th overall.  Where we struggled was with run stop win rate, where we were 28th.  Yikes!  We have GOT to learn how to stop the run.

Offensively, also probably what you would expect.  We were 23rd in pass block win rate, but 7th in run block win rate.  Looking at that run block win rate, it occurs to me that Mike Davis may not have been as good as we thought.  We were actually setting him up pretty well.  If we can figure out how to pass block, we're going to be dangerous.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Khaki Lackey said:

Does it count as a pressure if an edge rusher flushes a QB from the pocket and completes a TD?

I believe it does as the DL did their job in that scenario while the coverage failed.

Can also include QB hits/Hurries if there's interest, but I won't be able to edit OP to include it.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, BrianS said:

As a team last year, our pass rush win rate was pretty good at 12th overall.  Where we struggled was with run stop win rate, where we were 28th.  Yikes!  We have GOT to learn how to stop the run.

Offensively, also probably what you would expect.  We were 23rd in pass block win rate, but 7th in run block win rate.  Looking at that run block win rate, it occurs to me that Mike Davis may not have been as good as we thought.  We were actually setting him up pretty well.  If we can figure out how to pass block, we're going to be dangerous.

Eh... idk about that. It took until week 3 for the team to get their first sack and they were not lighting it up until later in the year with two 5 sack performances (vs DET & GB). It is definitely a good sign that they started to get to the QB but they weren't doing that until later in the season.

 

Fully agree with the team needing to do better vs the run tho

Edited by Icege
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yep. It was an obvious red flag that a lot of people ignored. The results/scores in preseason don’t matter, but individual performance very much does and individually, we looked like the least talented team in the league and it carried over.
    • Sorry, but in 2015, we didn’t look like poo to the extent of 2023. People who said it’s just preseason were completely wrong. Simple as that. 2015 was a veteran lead team. It was Cam’s 5th year and Luke’s 4th. Even our OL was 80% the same (added Oher) as the great run to finish 2014 with a playoff win. That year can be labeled as preseason doesn’t matter because I’m sure we rested vets and well, Ron/Mike weren’t putting in special plays, etc. I absolutely don’t recall a bunch of us saying that Turner was getting killed on one on ones or that Luke was completely out of position or that Norman was hurt again but probably fine. The only thing that was right about the 2023 preseason is that the minority of us who saw it, were correct that we A) should have been making Young and others play 100% of the reps as there was nothing to hide and B) the preseason means nothing was a bunch of BS trying to stay optimistic when it was obvious that we had way less good talent than the rest of the NFL.
    • You are telling me Paul Maurice is a better coach than Rod??? Yes!!!  It’s because he plays a better system and has a better goalie.   Our system sucks in playoffs and he refuses to roll with Koochie. Dallas cowboys level poo 
×
×
  • Create New...