Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers Training Camp Thoughts and Musings - Monday Edition


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

One thing we know about the OL--somebody who is drawing a pretty decent check is going to sit or get cut. 
LT:  What do we have, 6 people who could land the gig? (Moton, Christensen, Erving, Scott, Little, Daley)

Darnold may have some trauma he is fighting through--more than his California surfer dude approach is letting on.

TE is more important than we realize... I like our TEs right now--potentially speaking. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

One thing we know about the OL--somebody who is drawing a pretty decent check is going to sit or get cut. 
LT:  What do we have, 6 people who could land the gig? (Moton, Christensen, Erving, Scott, Little, Daley)

Darnold may have some trauma he is fighting through--more than his California surfer dude approach is letting on.

TE is more important than we realize... I like our TEs right now--potentially speaking. 

A few padded practices will sort out the OL.  It's hard to get a read on the offense until they sort out the missed routes and miss timed throws. It will take a while for it all to start clicking on the offense.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It may be that Darnold is one of those Rhule is targetting with that ass-chewing. If Zod is calling him out for holding onto the ball too long, you know the coaches have seen it and discussed it at length among their meetings.

This was a reclamation project at QB. It's going to take more than a spot of paint and some landscaping to make him viable again. Hope Rhule can get Darnold repaired before September. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, L-TownCat said:

How do you weigh the variables?  How much of Darnold’s issues are because of good coverage?  Bad line play?  Indecision?

I am hoping he just doesn't know the playbook well enough yet and is slow on his progressions. If so, that will get itself worked out with reps.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Zod said:

thought today would be a padded practice, as historically it is. But apparently Matt Rhule felt differently

I think only 3 teams have had padded practice. Saw that 29 are scheduled to tomorrow.  Definitely something to do with CBA, not just Rhule.

 

 

 

Edited by KB_fan
  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, Zod said:

I am hoping he just doesn't know the playbook well enough yet and is slow on his progressions. If so, that will get itself worked out with reps.

I would think it’s some what expected with a young QB in a new offense. Hell Brady looked rough early in Tampa (relatively speaking). He started off with a QBR of 40.3 against the Saints in week 1, 44 against us in Week 2.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, hepcat said:

I'm surprised to see Erving starting at LT, thought they'd roll with Trent Scott. Bet he gets some looks with the 1st team at LT very soon.

Scott did pretty good last year in the 4 games he started at LT, 2 of them we won.

Scott started in the Bucs, Lions, Packers and WFT games.  Bucs and WFT have nasty fronts too.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So the last guy who had the job got hired by his former team directly into a role he has no direct experience in?
    • Hard to pass up millions for a couple of days work per week for a coaching gig in the NFL that is 60-80 hours each week during the season and a more relaxed 50 hours a week during the off season. Yeah, I'd love to see him as our DC but hard to see him giving up the cushy job there if he gets it. And he's going to be a great commentator for the network.
    • Really, I think that is where negotiations come in. If you've got a QB getting you to 10 wins but statistically he's not a great performer, then you say look you can take $22 million or you can try it on the market. Because let's face it, out there, any leadership skills that we're seeing aren't going to be on the table, it's just going to be performance and that lands him in the QB2 market, which is much, much less lucrative (although any of us would love that money).  No one is saying that Bryce will be a $50 million QB, barring something short of a miraculous jump. I'm just saying that if we are winning somehow with him at the helm, then it would be fuging stupid to dive back into the rookie pool all over again. Let's say we do hit the 10 win mark, heck, let's call it 11 and a second round in the playoffs. I think we can all say that would be a really uplifting result and one that should be doable if we have good play. What do we do then? Here's what I would offer if I were Morgan and Tepper. $25 million a year for 3 years, each year with up to $10 million in incentives for touchdowns, wins, playoff depth, being under 10 interceptions, completing a full season, passing yardage milestones, taking less than 15 sacks. Look, Bryce isn't a Ferrari, he isn't a Corvette, or a mid-level BMW. He's probably a new Toyota Sienna that will definitely get you somewhere and bring the whole team along with it, no fuss but not a lot of pizazz.  And really, it's about the destination, not about what drove you there.
×
×
  • Create New...