Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Good Ole Waiver Wire - Your Friend and Mine


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

The team is not even close to good enough.

The only circumstance in which we are trading a 1st for a left tackle should be one that is our starter for the foreseeable future. And, in that scenario, one first may not be enough to get it done.

Who is the LT we could get for a first?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MasterAwesome said:

Your timeline seems to be a bit jacked up.  We signed Teddy last year, during the same offseason that Herbert was drafted.  Signing Teddy had zero impact on our 2020 draft position...that would have been the Kyle Allen season.

Marty wanted him. Others disagreed. That was Rhule not Rivera. 

?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Who is the LT we could get for a first?

Didn't even go far enough to speculate on that. Just throwing out a theoretical scenario in which it would be acceptable to make that kind of trade. Unless you are getting a quality LT starter, zero reason to be trading away a first for a middling LT.

Especially for a team that needs those draft picks as desperately as ours.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, rippadonn said:

Marty wanted him. Others disagreed. That was Rhule not Rivera. 

?

You've completely lost me now.....were you not saying we could have had a chance at drafting Herbert  (by improving our draft position) had we played Will Grier instead of Teddy Bridgewater?  Even though Bridgewater was signed less than a month before Herbert was drafted?  Why are we talking about Rhule vs. Rivera?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

5 hours ago, shaqattaq said:

Honestly, I could see us move on from Little with what we got. I see Erving and Scott ahead of him at LT, and probably Daley as well. Moton and Christensen at RT. Do we need 6 tackles on the active roster?? I think not.

 

To be fair. The only honest to goodness Tackles only, are Moton, and maybe Scott. Everyone else is a Tackle/Guard.

 

So in actuality, we only have 1-2 Tackles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, iamhubby1 said:

 

 

To be fair. The only honest to goodness Tackles only, are Moton, and maybe Scott. Everyone else is a Tackle/Guard.

 

So in actuality, we only have 1-2 Tackles.

Don't forget BC.  3rd round tackle, 2nd round guard.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Moo Daeng said:

I don't see the CB need.Bouye being suspended 2 weeks is something they already knew. As a veteran who's considered extremely knowledgeable and versatile it's not the end of the world and he has the extra time to heal up.

I could see a tackle that let's us move on from Little. Any usable tackle would do.

I would let Greg Little disappear into thin air and let the air he disappears into be our backup LT. 

 

It would do a better job.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Option A:  Pay your starting QB starting QB money. Option B:  Look for a starting QB for 4-10 years (or longer) while wasting the talent at every other position.    How many of the top 20 QB's do you think are worth what they are being paid?   When you factor in the last year of his present deal his contract is really an average of 45 million per year which in today's QB market is a very, very good deal. I wish we'd had found a Brock Purdy to pay 50+ million a year right after we parted ways with Cam.  Ya'll go ahead and live in fairy tale land where good to great (much less elite) QB's are available to pay. Just the fact that they had the chance to pay Brock after the disaster of trading up for Lance is a testament that when you find a quarter back you can win with, complete in the playoffs and superbowls with, you pay him.  
    • They will still be a playoff team but they aren't contenders anymore IMO. They won't be able to spend like they have when they went to a SB and proved he couldn't carry a win at that level with a really good team around him. Now he is going to have to do it with less to spend around him. They just locked in to being a playoff bound team that's going to be a known speed bump for whoever will represent the NFC in the SB.
    • Hmm. I think he'll live up to it. Last year, about half of his team was on IR it seems, at one time or another. Year before, Super Bowl appearance. Year before that, playoff run after being third on the depth chart and being pressed into service. Is he one of the greatest in the game right now? Nope. No chance of that. Is he in the top 10 going into next season? Pretty good chance of that.  Would 20 or more teams in this league love to have the guy as their starting QB. Most likely so. He's a good QB who can implement his coach's game plan to a T and has both the confidence of and confidence in his teammates. That'll take you a long way in this league if you've got the right cast around you, and he does.  
×
×
  • Create New...