Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

After final cuts, how many guys and at what positions do we get from waivers?


45catfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, CRA said:

To be fair to Slye.  Let's note Carolina did lead the NFL in touchback %.  87.5% of his kickoffs are touchbacks. 

a middle of the road NFL had 59% touchbacks.  The worst was 33%. 

so he does provide some very good consistency on that front. 

Yeah, as others have said, this matters a lot less now with the 25 yard starting position.

So, man, Slye just can't catch a break. The league just recently changed the rule on the one thing that could make his skillset valuable to an NFL team.

Remember the days when we carried two kickers because there was such a thing as a "Kickoff Specialist?" Yeah, I don't think anyone's giving up a roster spot these days to let the opposition start on the 25.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Captroop said:

Yeah, as others have said, this matters a lot less now with the 25 yard starting position.

So, man, Slye just can't catch a break. The league just recently changed the rule on the one thing that could make his skillset valuable to an NFL team.

Remember the days when we carried two kickers because there was such a thing as a "Kickoff Specialist?" Yeah, I don't think anyone's giving up a roster spot these days to let the opposition start on the 25.

I'd cut Slye a break if he didn't shank everything right. 

He needed to gtfo in the offseason. 

Edited by OldhamA
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, shaqattaq said:

Luvu has been making plays. Looks to be solid depth. Not sure about how his speed holds up in coverage, but he plays fast downhill. I'm not arguing, just didn't want to forget someone who's having a great preseason. 

THIS.

Tbh, when we picked him up I wasnt excited at all. I'm now certain he makes this team. I actually thought Miller would make the 53 ..and he still might but as of now he's behind Luvu. 

As for the thread topic.... OL, Corner (injuries), and LB. 

Side note: We keep getting gashed in the run. That needs to be fixed. Last time we were getting destroyed by the run game we countered it by drafting a guy name Kuechly. 

Last year, we got lucky and picked up Chinn. Now he's a safety and the last line of defense. We need somebody infront of him. Perryman's health cant be counted on but hopefully Carter Jr and Shaq can step up. 

Then again, I haven't seen enough of the starters to identify if its truly going to be a problem. This Steelers game should show us alot. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ive change my feeling toward LB, so long perryman is able to play.

Shaq

Carter

Perryman

Luvu

Stanford

Johnson

 

They look better than I thought- Chinn, Reddick, Miller, Bynes, Frankin could help some or factor in as well. Sure it needs improving, but its as bad as I thought.

Plus Patty fisher to the PS.

 

Not in panic mode. Can get by this yr and focus on improving next. 

Edited by Basbear
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ColumbusCounty said:

THIS.

Tbh, when we picked him up I wasnt excited at all. I'm now certain he makes this team. I actually thought Miller would make the 53 ..and he still might but as of now he's behind Luvu. 

As for the thread topic.... OL, Corner (injuries), and LB. 

Side note: We keep getting gashed in the run. That needs to be fixed. Last time we were getting destroyed by the run game we countered it by drafting a guy name Kuechly. 

Last year, we got lucky and picked up Chinn. Now he's a safety and the last line of defense. We need somebody infront of him. Perryman's health cant be counted on but hopefully Carter Jr and Shaq can step up. 

Then again, I haven't seen enough of the starters to identify if its truly going to be a problem. This Steelers game should show us alot. 

That didn't change until they drafted Starr and Short - remember Fua and McClain. They were the equivalents of Cam's Silatolu and Nate Chandler (and Byron Bell). Starr allowed Luke to be Luke better than anyone else and losing him may have even taken a couple of seasons away from Luke's career. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bump...so Slye has been cut and now we are looking for 1-2 LBs.  Ricci is getting more looks at FB, but honestly they are just trying to find him a home since he's a good STer.  Ricci isn't a FB so one should be brought in.  I still expect an OT (swing, most likely) and a young, promising DE to be picked up off waivers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, 1of10Charnatives said:

Because lots of teams waive OT's worth keeping and young promising DE's?

I know it's shock, but some teams draft well and are wise with FA moves.  There's only so many positions are available on the 53 man roster, so yeah, there are very serviceable players available after final cuts.  Just because we suck at building depth; that isn't the case for every team in the NFL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, 1of10Charnatives said:

Because lots of teams waive OT's worth keeping and young promising DE's?

They occasionally will cut old vets that are still decent….but are expensive and they feel comfortable making the replacement after a full preseason. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Give me Mitchell Evans over T Sanders in this run heavy offense any day of the week. 
    • What's up gents, the OGs remember me, the guy who single-handedly gave the Panthers the greatest uniform in history moniker. Not too long after that I got involved with Pro Football Focus (pre-Collinsworth acquisition) and ended up taking backseat here to preserve some objectivity. But from a distance I noticed a lot. After the end of the Cam era this place devolved into the most un-fun, petty, negative cesspool of whining and bitching that has ever graced the internet. The worst part of it all is that the level of discussion turned into the most ill-informed, hot-take, unnuanced crap, rife with people talking out of their posteriors as if they have any clue about what they are watching. Once you get into the professional side of the sport and actual film rooms, you start to understand there's an absurd number of moving parts to pretty much every snap and the details you are privy to are truly only half the picture. The absolute most important thing I learned from being part of professional level football analysis is that quarterbacking is literally the most intricate and difficult position in all of professional sports, and that the NFL itself is struggling to develop any workable model that allows them to understand what makes one succeed vs what makes one fail. Because of this paradox it has also made the quarterback position itself grossly overvalued from a fan and media standpoint, creating an absurd fixation on the results delivered by a single player who has to rely on the contributions of everyone around them. This also drives the dreaded inflation of QB salaries that inevitably cause even elite teams to lose key talent all to pour cash into the one player supposed to be able to single-handedly elevate the entire team (and defense and special teams and coaching and ownership by some mysterious proxy), yet without those same players even talented teams can wander the wilderness searching for the right guy to take advantage of their talent window. The discussions the last few years around Bryce has personified this insanity, as this board has devolved into some sort of electronic civil war between the hyperbolic Young supporters and the vitriolic Bryce haters. The reality, like practically everything in this world, is somewhere in the middle. He has traits that can absolutely elevate a team with creativity, play recognition, off-arm angle throws, mental toughness, etc. He's also physically limited, with mostly "good-enough" qualities for most situations that a professional quarterback is asked to do, and will never be an overpowering physical force like pre-injury Cam. But "good-enough" physicality represents a large majority of championship-winning quarterbacks, even in the modern era. There's a reason the corpse of Peyton Manning took the chip from elite physical specimen Cam, because the team surrounding him was talented enough to get him there, while we all know Cam was the driving force of that 2015 team. That's no knock on him, that's just how the game of football tends to work: the more complete team usually wins. The summary is this: if this team lives or dies solely on the performance of its quarterback, then it is absolutely a paper tiger even if he plays brilliantly week in and out. There are no superheroes in this sport, there are only conduits that proxy the collective efforts of much of the team around them. And no one alive can tell you how the position is played perfectly, it's all a confluence of circumstance and what unique collection of traits each player brings to the position, which can never be truly recreated season after season, even for the same player on the same team. If this place remains a raging hellscape of idiotic hot takes I will happily remove myself again and do something more productive for yet another decade, but maybe's there hope that we can all get back to the old adage, and keep pounding.
    • Really impressed how the bottom six have looked the past couple games
×
×
  • Create New...