Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers are trading LB Denzel Perryman to the Las Vegas Raiders


AndrewLaskoski
 Share

Recommended Posts

31 minutes ago, TheRumGone said:

These guys are clowns. All that drama for a guy who practiced like twice and got beat out of a starting role. There are much better reasons to question rhule and fitterers moves. This isn’t one of them.

Agreed. Much ado about nothing. 

And his mush mouthed explanation of his source describing a nonsensical exchange between a player and Rhule was nothing. 

Similarly from the poster's description of him being a "dictator" isn't this literally how about half the coaches in the NFL are described? That isn't an isolated thing. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, CPcavedweller said:

I've never heard of him. I admittedly didn't watch as much NFL football in 2020 as I did in previous years. 

In all honesty, I'm for signing or trading for anyone that can help the team. If you believe McGovern can do it, and his cost is reasonable, I'd say go for it.

For me, I just love the speed and length of Smith. He's almost a Kam Chancellor type of talent if used properly due to his measurables. With Chinn and Smith you'd almost have a Thomas/Chancellor dynamic. However we would be in a better position on the boundary with Horn than Seattle was with Sherman, in my opinion.

Of course neither option will happen. And I don't believe that Snow is a Bradley or the other DC (forgot his name).

The word on McGovern is that the Cowboys view him as a starting quality guard but they have too many people ahead of him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Moo Daeng said:

I hate sounding like a broken record but all anybody who covers this team on social media or radio does is complain and create drama about everything.

That's what happens when losing becomes the norm and all fans have to talk about is the draft or the potential of next season. Yes some of it is aggravating but you can't blame the fans of the media for the product on the field.

Edited by frankw
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, frankw said:

That's what happens when losing becomes the norm and all fans have to talk about is the draft or the potential of next season. Yes some of it is aggravating but you can't blame the fans of the media for the product on the field.

I'm not blaming them for the product on the field. I'm blaming them for their reactionary tactics.

If there is anything to report the default mode it to spin it to the negative to rile up the reponses.

Edited by Moo Daeng
Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, CanePantherHornet said:

It's probably BS but who knows

I'd say there's a pretty good chance

Used to be the bullsh-t "I've got a source" stories came mostly from Guy With A Website. Anymore it's Guy With A Twitter or Guy With A YouTube Channel.

Still bullsh-t of course, just on a different medium.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, frankw said:

That's what happens when losing becomes the norm and all fans have to talk about is the draft or the potential of next season. Yes some of it is aggravating but you can't blame the fans of the media for the product on the field.

Losing was the norm under the old braintrust.

The current one hasn't even been in place long enough to have a "norm" yet.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Moo Daeng said:

I'm not blaming them for the product on the field. I'm blaming them for their reactionary tactics.

If there is anything to report the default mode it to spin it to the negative to rile up the reponses.

Agreed on the nature of social media which obviously thrives on negativity. But we just see more of it because it has been years since the team has been relevant for winning anything of significance. The Hornets social media pages aren't any better and they haven't been to two championships like the Panthers on top of losing the franchise once already.

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

Losing was the norm under the old braintrust.

The current one hasn't even been in place long enough to have a "norm" yet.

Valid. But with all sports teams there is a honeymoon period and the one for this regime will officially end with the '21 season. If Darnold is a success the tide will turn and there will be a much needed boost of positivity. If not well things will start heating up like any other sports franchise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, KSpan said:

Again, I'm not making definitive statements. The difference with FA though and particularly the guys signed is that there is already extensive film on them. Expectations can be reasonably set and thus far they're right on par with those performance-based expectations, which were fairly low.

Thus far based on one pre-season drive?

Ok.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

Thus far based on one pre-season drive?

Ok.

Erving's been nicked throughout camp and Elflein's been unremarkable/unnoticed so yes, inclusive of that and camp in its entirety. This isn't complicated. No one is making a definitive statement but they both have years of performance to measure against and thus far are what they appeared to be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, KSpan said:

Erving's been nicked throughout camp and Elflein's been unremarkable/unnoticed so yes, inclusive of that and camp in its entirety. This isn't complicated. No one is making a definitive statement but they both have years of performance to measure against and thus far are what they appeared to be.

Yeah, it would be different if they were out there crushing it in the preseason and there was some dramatic difference we were seeing. That hasn't been the case. When you have sucked for years, the onus is on you to prove you don't suck, not for everyone else to assume that you figured it out. 

Sort of like Greg Little. After just one season it was pretty obvious was the situation was but we still had people holding out hope all that "potential" was going to be realized. Gotta show up and prove that poo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Dragoon11 said:

Do we have room this season to IDK... sign a good LT?

Im afraid not, given there are only about 15 real LT, 10 OT trying hard, and 7 RT larping as LT. Its rare to have a true LT, better odds for a good QB than good LT. 

16 hours ago, trueblade said:

 

Fitts more of a college guy. I think with Dan Morgan coming in as our pro guy, next year we will do better with FA.

Im not ready to call this FA class, my first reaction was very poor, but Im not form the future. About the only thing I liked was perryman and low salary mid-level players.... Arnold reports keep bring hope to save it, along solid play form DL play for Jones/Fox/Reddick along the line. If ERV&ELF just play average I will be amazed. No lie, Im still shocked his first "big" targets where ERV&ELF. 

It is a good point about Dan helping the pro side form the panthers. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There was once a player in MLB who was traded for himself. He was part of a trade that involved a player to be named later (one of the many aspects of MLB that keeps me from never taking it seriously). He didn't work out with his new team so they shipped him back as the player to be named later. The Denzel Perryman saga with the Panthers reminds me of this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, 1of10Charnatives said:

There was once a player in MLB who was traded for himself. He was part of a trade that involved a player to be named later (one of the many aspects of MLB that keeps me from never taking it seriously). He didn't work out with his new team so they shipped him back as the player to be named later. The Denzel Perryman saga with the Panthers reminds me of this.

There's a film with Marco Scutaro (A's legend) called A Player to Be Named Later. He went on to have a decent career and was an afterthought in a trade somewhere down the line. Fun times.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Jon Snow said:

Sure!  Do you one one lying around somewhere?

Yeah, I guess I see the point... it's about as hard as finding a "good" NFL QB. Maybe the word I should have used was "serviceable"... is that on our roster currently? (why did you have to do the whole reverse psychology on me damnit!?) lol

Edited by Dragoon11
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...