Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

19/25 and 2 TD


jb2288
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Proudiddy said:

He finished on a hugh note, and left me hopeful he may have gotten in his bag and found a rhythm moving forward...  Robby was happy with it.  But, I'm ngl, the OL really wasn't all that bad except for Elflein, and yet, Sam had some very Clausen-like moments early.  So, although I'm encouraged by the final drive, the extremes I saw from some of the panic stuff he did earlier is troubling. 

He really did not look calm or comfortable at the beginning. Let’s hope it was first game jitters and we see the 2nd quarter version moving forward. Also dear god, start Brady. He looked better than anyone not named Moton

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Sam the Cat said:

On the other side of the coin,  incomplete pass gives us a field goal try, that is the difference between  a win or a loss in the NFL.  He had to throw that away...not a sack.   

we might not be talking about the same play. the one I'm talking about, he had no business getting rid of that ball. he got lucky it wasn't ruled a fumble. if you want to make that play a difference between a win or a loss in the NFL, that was a losing play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, vorbis said:

we might not be talking about the same play. the one I'm talking about, he had no business getting rid of that ball. he got lucky it wasn't ruled a fumble. if you want to make that play a difference between a win or a loss in the NFL, that was a losing play.

We are talking about the same play...he takes a sack, we are out of the fg range.  Throwing away is the righr play...hope olthe line can give more than a split second next time...

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Sam the Cat said:

We are talking about the same play...he takes a sack, we are out of the fg range.  Throwing away is the righr play...hope olthe line can give more than a split second next time...

nah. there's a way to throw the ball away on that play, but it's not by going through your entire throwing motion while already in the grips of a defender with other defenders within arm's length of swatting the ball. I guarantee you he'll be coached up on that in film session. if he wanted to throw it away, he should have done it earlier. at that point, the right play was to take the sack.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He looks great when he's confident and gets the jitters out of his system. Once he gets confidence and comfortable, I think that will be the key to his success. He was seeing ghosts at first but I like that he slowed himself down and composed himself. He made some really get plays under pressure.

 

That line worries me the most for sure. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The last drive of the first half was great.  85ish yards in a bit of a hurry up situation.  Nice back shoulder location on the td to robby.  At least the starters ended the preseason really strong.  That could carry over some to week 1. 

However, like many others have said, a lot is going to hinge on getting at least average oline play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

let me just walk back my "guarantee" a liiiittle bit.

Darnold confirmed that he was just trying to get rid of the ball during that sack during his presser, so I get that he had a plan with it.

I just don't think that's the right move. and given Rhule's point of view on Teddy extending the ball over the goal line last season, I think the head coach will have a similar opinion about it. good result, but bad process, if that makes sense.

so much of the talk when Darnold came to the Panthers was about fixing bad habits. several times that has been likened to him playing a bit less hero ball, playing within the structure of the offense, not trying to do "too much" etc. that play was old Darnold in that respect. but I get that he intentionally wanted to dump the ball to stay in FG range.

Edited by vorbis
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought Darnold and the offense improved over the course of the first half. Blitzburgh brought pressure on most plays which pressured the defense and the backs. I thought they all got over their jitters and played well as a group. The line got better as well as they figured out their protections which they normally do with gameplanning.  Sure we got work to do but this was a top 3 defense so their depth should have still been pretty good and their scheme stayed the same.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, therealmjl said:

Improved as he settled in. Showed flashes.

Will go as far as the OL goes

If they don't improve, Sam won't go far at all.  

1 hour ago, Jorgie said:

Encouraged. But that “incomplete pass” cannot happen

You're right.  He should've taken a sack and taken the team out of FG range.  That would've been the better play.  🙃

1 hour ago, vorbis said:

nah. there's a way to throw the ball away on that play, but it's not by going through your entire throwing motion while already in the grips of a defender with other defenders within arm's length of swatting the ball. I guarantee you he'll be coached up on that in film session. if he wanted to throw it away, he should have done it earlier. at that point, the right play was to take the sack.

 

1 hour ago, vorbis said:

let me just walk back my "guarantee" a liiiittle bit.

Darnold confirmed that he was just trying to get rid of the ball during that sack during his presser, so I get that he had a plan with it.

I just don't think that's the right move. and given Rhule's point of view on Teddy extending the ball over the goal line last season, I think the head coach will have a similar opinion about it. good result, but bad process, if that makes sense.

so much of the talk when Darnold came to the Panthers was about fixing bad habits. several times that has been likened to him playing a bit less hero ball, playing within the structure of the offense, not trying to do "too much" etc. that play was old Darnold in that respect. but I get that he intentionally wanted to dump the ball to stay in FG range.

Sometimes "bad process" works out but you're right.

I'm sure he and Rhule will work on that 'cause it was risky in that someone could've knocked the ball from his hand before he even tried to wind up and throw it. 

Regardless, he had a solid night as we FINALLY got to see him get much-needed reps.  WHO KNEW that a QB needs reps to get into Game-shape?   This is my shocked face : 😑

Edited by glenwo2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

The OL looked like ass and Darnold still sees ghosts and panics at the first hint of pressure. Not a good combo.

This OL is gonna have to get a lot better very quickly to give Darnold a legit shot at resurrecting his career.

You're getting poops, but you're right. Im not sure why you are getting so much poop. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • OL then RB would make heads explode but its might not be too unlikely 
    • Wonder if we draft a RB. Seems like a lot of eggs in Brooks’ basket right now.  And the OL, no kidding. If that running game goes to hell with what we have at QB, you can forget competing. It is so much more important than sticking another wideout on the field. Take your wideout later. 
    • I have lots of different thoughts on it. This argument, the primary thing is I don’t like seeing him or anyone, being convicted on hearsay and/or pure speculation. Which some are doing.  I don’t care That much about defending Morgan as I do about the criticism being fair minded.    You sort of assert that Dan was just a yes man. I don’t think we know if he ever pushed back against Fitterer but I have this instinct thing that needs me to satisfy the question of: if Tepper was so down on a Fitterer as to fire him, why in the world would he hire his carbon copy? I guess maybe he wanted a yes man.Like I said, lots of different thoughts.     I am just not gonna judge him that harshly based only on speculation. I am sticking with what he has done starting when he was hired as GM. Maybe I am more lenient because the first season for him and Canales, I gave both a pass. Said I would judge them after the first year. Stuck to it. If you can get to the reality that neither were ready for the job and say okay give them a year get their feet wet, it looks a lot better.    And we are not bound to Bryce yet. Yes, for yet another fuging year he can probably marginally improve and slide by like he has been doing. But if they add even more people and he regresses? I think we could see some relief.    The QB room? As I understand it, Pickett was Canales’ choice. If we need to blame people for poo. In a sense, he is very Bryce like. So makes a good plug in. I get that a little bit. We still have the draft. If they do better than Jake Plummer or Hooker I’ll know they are trying.   
×
×
  • Create New...