Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

8 Saints test positive for Covid (coaches and player)


BlitzMonster
 Share

Recommended Posts

Relax.  The only details have been six assistant coaches, one nutritionist, and one player on IR have been placed in protocol.  That could mean they all had close contact with someone that tested positive and not actually be positive.  The Saints have 100% of staff vaccinated meaning protocol would be having two negative tests 24 hours apart and they can return immediately.  There's a chance they can all be back by in person by Thursday.  They can still sit in on game planning remotely.  The player doesn't come into play at all being on IR.

Edited by AsylumGuido
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Bama Panther said:

If they are the kinds of football coaches who are young and in some semblance of shape, they very, very likely wouldn’t die anyway.  

And if they aren't, you never know.

You never really know anyway, because fitness gurus have died as well.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/aug/04/fit-and-healthy-man-42-from-southport-who-rejected-vaccine-dies-of-covid

Edited by top dawg
To add link
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, glenwo2 said:

I don't know where this forfeit talk is coming from BUT if it did happen, it would be both a good thing and a bad thing.

A good thing because it gives the Panthers a nice 2-0 start to the season plus it's one game less that CMC gets overused.

A bad thing because we still won't know how Sam would've improved from Week 1.   There will be constant speculation for another full week regarding that. 

 

Anyway, we'll see how the NFL handles this.  

 

Call me crazy, but I think I'd take the automatic win and just deal with a week of Sam speculation. 

(That said, I doubt very highly the game will be forfeited)

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LegioX said:

Not trying to bring politics into this, then why are vaccinated people ordered to wear masks if “we will be just fine” ?

I think to make it easier on those that are not vaccinated.  Not to mentioned you can still catch and spread if vaccinated, although rare.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, AsylumGuido said:

Relax.  The only details have been six assistant coaches, one nutritionist, and one player on IR have been placed in protocol.  That could mean they all had close contact with someone that tested positive and not actually be positive.  The Saints have 100% of staff vaccinated meaning protocol would be having two negative tests 24 hours apart and they can return immediately.  There's a chance they can all be back by in person by Thursday.  They can still sit in on game planning remotely.  The player doesn't come into play at all being on IR.

This Is Fine GIF

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my opinion Fitterer was probably right about not paying McCaffrey. Now not wanting to "pay RBs" in my opinion isn't something you want to set in stone, to me it all comes down to the individual.
    • Maybe I'm just not understanding, but everywhere that I have read says that signing bonuses go against the cap prorated by as much as five years. The following example uses Andrew Luck's rookie contract as an example. "Take Andrew Luck, the first overall pick in the 2012 NFL draft. Luck signed a four-year contract with the Colts worth $22.1 million and included a $14.5 million signing bonus. Rather than a $14.5 million cap hit in 2012, the Colts spread out his signing bonus over the life of his contract. The hit against the cap would be $3.625 million per year over four years instead of a direct cap hit of $14.5 million directly in 2012. This gave the Colts more leverage and cap flexibility in signing other players." https://www.the33rdteam.com/nfl-signing-bonuses-explained/ I don't know why some of you think that signing bonuses aren't counted against the cap over the length of the contract, but whatever.   "The bonus with a signing is usually the most garish aspect of a rookie contract. Bonus is the immediate cash players receive when they ink a deal. It factors into the cap, but only for the whole contract duration, in terms of salary cap calculations. In the case of Bryce Young’s $24.6 million signing bonus, that’s prorated to approximately $6.15 million per season over a four-year deal. This format allows teams to handle the cap and provides rookies with some short-term fiscal stability, which is important given the high injury risk in this league." https://collegefootballnetwork.com/how-rookie-contracts-work-in-the-nfl/ I understand how signing bonuses can be a useful tool in order to manage the cap, and as one of the article suggests, signing bonuses may become important if you have a tight cap, but the bill is always going to come due. I'm not necessarily referring to you Tuka, but it seems to me that others simply don't want to understand that fact which is why they're reacting to what I'm saying negatively. How odd. In any event, I have a better general understanding of why signing bonuses are used now, and it's generally to fit salaries under the cap. Surely players, whether they be rookies or not, love a signing bonus because they get a good portion of their money up front. This in turn gives them more security and probably amounts to tax benefits as well. I also understand why teams would not want to use signing bonuses, particularly for players or draftees who have a higher probability of being gone before a contract even ends.
    • Get any shot you can at humane society, so much cheaper
×
×
  • Create New...