Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

New Base Defense -- Odd Fronts**


SetfreexX
 Share

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, therealmjl said:

Phil Snow looks like a guy you’d see walking out of the nearby gas station with a pack of reds, case of Bud heavy and a bag full of pickled eggs and beef jerky but he is putting on a clinic every Sunday and has been since he strutted into BoA.

I've liked Phil from the jump. He has prototypical grizzled football guy written all over him.

  • Pie 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, therealmjl said:

Phil Snow looks like a guy you’d see walking out of the nearby gas station with a pack of reds, case of Bud heavy and a bag full of pickled eggs and beef jerky but he is putting on a clinic every Sunday and has been since he strutted into BoA.

He's the kind of guy that you want to sit down with and listen to him discuss football over a beer or 12.  Imagine the stories he could tell. 

  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some of the most successful defenses in the last decade didn't seem to truly have a base.

Take for instance the Seahawks and Legion of Boom. Lots and lots of pass rusher types and no real true 3-4 or 4-3. That defense also had lots of versatile players that didn't limit the defense.

Rivera's D the last few years he was here was a very standard looking 4-3 without much of anything different.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, mav1234 said:

I have to admit I thought Snow was some kind of weird Rhule charity case from his bio... But man, that's why Rhule is in charge of a football team and I'm on CarolinaHuddle from my couch.

Snow has surprised so many ways.  If he keeps this defense flying around the field it'll be one of the best we've ever fielded.

I usually huddle from the toilet. But, to each their own

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, cardiackat88. said:

Rivera's D the last few years he was here was a very standard looking 4-3 without much of anything different.

Every pre-season, there'd be a few posters suggesting we change to a 3-4 front, but they'd always be shouted down by the irrefutable logic that we DIDN'T HAVE THE PLAYERS TO DO THAT.

Now all this "versatility" emphasis has changed all that nonsense.  Remember the "amoeba" fronts some DCs employed?

We've now gotten ourselves an "octopus" defense.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, cardiackat88. said:

Some of the most successful defenses in the last decade didn't seem to truly have a base.

Take for instance the Seahawks and Legion of Boom. Lots and lots of pass rusher types and no real true 3-4 or 4-3. That defense also had lots of versatile players that didn't limit the defense.

Rivera's D the last few years he was here was a very standard looking 4-3 without much of anything different.

We ran a 3-4 in Rivera's last year, and it was mostly a disaster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think starting this week you gotta work in Tremayne out there.   You don't got to bench XL but Tremayne just seems to be clearly a better WR at this stage (despite XL having the physical tools).   I think waiting on Coker is malpractice.    
    • I don't like much about this team BUT WE ARE GONNA WIN THIS THING BABY LETS GOOOOOOO
    • I agree completely.  I’m not absolving XL of his errors and shortcomings, but week 2 was definitely less an issue with him as it was QB and coaching/scheme.     It’s becoming abundantly clear, not just with XL, but with everyone on the offense, our coaches are not crafting a game plan to play to their players’ strengths, but rather they’re creating a game plan and then trying to fit guys into it where each position is treating each player as interchangeable and they’re not.  The breakdown I watched also discussed how no one expected XL to be destroying people with his route running coming out - that would have to be refined.  So, the poo we’re seeing, we can’t really blame him for.  He has gotten open enough often, but the passes are often off-target.  And he would likely excel more as a guy who can threaten with the deep ball to take the top off the defense, but we don’t have a QB that can throw that pass.
×
×
  • Create New...