Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Matt Rhule says the Panthers offense is about to have a "vastly different look," redefined with more of an emphasis on the run game.


SgtJoo
 Share

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Translation:

Matt Rhule says, "Alright  Damn it. We accept it. We fuged up at QB. Again."

Or it might just be common sense when you’ve been running the ball well and it’s working to run it more often. Control the time of possession and your defense won’t be so gassed at the end.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

You are correct. Cowboys showed that man coverage plus base four rush beats us. No need to bring the house and give the qbs easy throws if the dline is able to do it on their own. 
 

For some reason, joe Brady wasn’t calling counter plays to this, like rub routes, double routes, pocket moving throws or seam routes up the middle. 
 

I believe Rhule noticed this yesterday and is exhausted of some The play calls that Brady is calling. Yesterday, I counted about 5-6 recycled plays from our previous games… very disappointed in lack of creativity and originality in our playbook.

Ever since that Cowboys game, teams has been playing man against us. I'm not a football coach or anything but if I can notice this sitting on my couch without even looking at film on a daily basis then how come Joe Brady can't? I'm a believer in Rhule but Joe Brady may need to go and be a Head Coach at LSU or USC somewhere because what he is doing ain't it.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

Why did they abandon the run on the last drive of the second quarter? Almost in field goal range to take the lead and we get 3 pass plays, a timeout and a delay of game. That's 100% on coaching. 

Who is saying it isn’t the coaching? Are you agreeing with me? Is this a rhetorical question?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CRA said:

I mean to just line up and run it at folks….requires an OL capable of such.  
 

I mean if you straight up tell the Giants you are going to go run heavy with a weak OL….I would imagine they can implode that gameplan. 

I don’t think we’ve gameplanned for weeks.

I sincerely get the feeling that a couple weeks ago, Matt Rhule realized “I have no idea what I’m doing, I just hope I can hide it a few more years” and he’s praying for a few more broken plays by the other team every week 

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Carl Spackler said:

So what he’s really saying is we’ll throw 50 times every game. 

By-gosh, we are about to go straight Teddy-ball.  Now if Darnold can just slow-pitch underhanded so our backs and WRs can hold onto the ball 5-yards from the LOS, I think we got a winning game plan!

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm not to sure it's a solid argument to try to estimate what he will do this season, BUT he's had a solid 3 years in the league. Here's his numbers compared to Jewell's for the same time period. I can see the logic of getting a starting MLB for a (at best) WR4. AT, XL and Tmac are certainly our top 3 guys IN 2025. Certainly worth pondering.
    • Training camp just started and it's already starting... https://www.facebook.com/reel/24277303321904901/?mibextid=rS40aB7S9Ucbxw6v LOL No one believes you and you have fan pages sharing this with a "Play him or trade him" headline. Oh wee mayne. This is why no front offices wanted any part of this.
    • Honestly, it only makes sense if you're trying to chase being the best bad team you can be this year. The number one question we need answered this season is whether or not Bryce is our long-term franchise QB. Trading away a second year WR who was second on the team in catch percentage, first in yards per target, and who clearly outplayed your 1st round pick for a likely one year rental fill in LB is exactly the type of short sighted desperation moves that has made us the worst franchise in the league under Tepper. We gotta stop making these types of moves and just focus on building a good organization and a good roster. Lloyd is a JAG LB another bad team and awful defense is wavering on and a couple of Panthers fans are salivating over him. Oof. We just need to be patient and wait. Definitely make some calls around the league to teams deep at LB and see if there's an opportunity to add one for a late round pick. Definitely shop the waiver wire hard. The reality is that LB is almost certainly going to be a weakness for us this year. We weren't fixing our entire roster in one off-season and we're not fixing an overall weak positional group in late July.  If you trade for Lloyd LB is still a weakness and you've given up a young promising WR who could potentially help you answer the question of whether or not Bryce is that guy. That's bad football business.
×
×
  • Create New...