Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Let's just go on record right now. Who you picking Shula or Brady


Snake
 Share

Who you picking Shula or Brady?  

45 members have voted

  1. 1. Who's the better OC at this point?

    • Brady
      23
    • Shula
      22


Recommended Posts

54 minutes ago, Khyber53 said:

Not sure we would see Brady making use of Cam very well. It's not in the college playbook he keeps using.

Having Cam sure would make Brady's red zone play calling a lot better.

Brady: "Cam, please barrel through people including your own shitty blockers and get in the endzone."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, hepcat said:

Having Cam sure would make Brady's red zone play calling a lot better.

Brady: "Cam, please barrel through people including your own shitty blockers and get in the endzone."

Funny, to start the year off, Darnold was doing that actually more than Cam ever did. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, hepcat said:

He sure was. Imagine if he had a true running threat to do it. Darnold would get killed if Brady kept calling those plays.

Actually, I want to see Darnold with some more running options. Probably safer for him to be out in front of this o-line than behind it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, gmonjimbo said:

Cam > Bridgewater, PJ Walker, Sam Bradford 

Rookie CMC  > Chubba Hubbard, Mike Davis, Reggie Bonnafon

Greg Olsen > Ian Thomas, Dan Arnold, Tommy Tremble

Ryan Kalil > Matt Paradis

Trai Turner > John Miller

Andrew Norwell > Denis Daley, Michael Jordan, Pat Eflein 

Ted Ginn < DJ Moore

Devin Funchess < Robby Anderson 

Shula had far better talent to work with than Joe Brady. Particularly at the positions that matter the most, QB and OL. Until I comparable talent at least at OL, I can't judge Brady too harshly. 

 

I think you are breaking the rules as I believe the overall objective is to poo on the current coaching staff.  I agree with your point though.  Brady is trying to make chicken salad out of chicken poo and he lacks the experience in this.  I am still concerned just how good he can be but that is TBD from my point of view.  

I suppose we/I  simply lack the wisdom others have.  They seem to be able to make snap judgements on just about everything. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Something sticks out to me and it's the fact that Rhule said "We usually score our points in the first couple of drives and then we can't seem to move the ball" or words to that effect. Which we have all very clearly noticed. Several opposing players have also said our offense was incredibly predictable. Connect the dots. 

Brady hasn't shown he can call plays in the NFL. He doesn't seem to adjust mid game either. It's stick with the game plan all the way through. Even if it isn't working. 

I'm going with Shula 100% until Brady proves he can call plays and have success in the NFL. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Icege said:

Joe Brady, and it isn't even close.

Now if it was who do we prefer between Brady or Chudzinski, then I might have to do some thinking.

Chud was fun to watch.  He seemed to really know how to use Cam.  Like a prior response said Shula had a Ferrari and drove it like a Pickup truck.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Basically agree.  He is the one of that bunch that offers upgraded pass catching along with he is supposed to be kind of special.   Then you have the OL and the ideas that if they perform you can have JAG backs and still do well. So okay we could be fine.  But Brooks is important and to me that receiving element sets him apart.  So there sure is something riding on him.     What strikes me as incongruent is people over in Atlanta or those that follow them look at Penix with a third surgery and act like it is no big deal.      And we are on pins and needles over Brooks.  Either they should worry a lot more or we should worry a lot less.  
    • I usually go a game or two optimist over the consensus here but this is too early for me to say. I need to see some players on the field.  I am not feeling real optimistic though.  
    • Okay as a ‘take CJ’ fan I actually don’t obsess over CJ and Houston, contrary to the narrative.  But I thought I picked up some noise that his OL left a lot to be desired.    Not a single Beyce supporter would judge him harshly if he had a crappy OL. We all know that.    So be fair about it.  A QB needs to be protected.  Especially a guy that gets to his spot and wants to finish the play from there. Which CJ is.  
×
×
  • Create New...