Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Joe Brady on the hot seat.


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

If we fire Joe Brady after he was one of the hottest coaching names in football while never giving him an OL or QB to work with, Tepper is REALLY gonna have to open the wallet to attract a decent replacement because anyone with other options will go somewhere else.

I'm not sure how he became one of the hottest coaching names with such a short resume.  Maybe he benefitted from the new young and upcoming craze.  Whatever it was he and Rhule don't seem to be on the same page when it comes to who can run it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

If we fire Joe Brady after he was one of the hottest coaching names in football while never giving him an OL or QB to work with, Tepper is REALLY gonna have to open the wallet to attract a decent replacement because anyone with other options will go somewhere else.

Not at all. There's a "hottest name in coaching" every year and you never hear from them again after that because they mostly flame out anyway.

Then they can look and see Joe Burrow play the same without him and then check the little resume he had and be like oh yea hurr wasn't much there to begin with.

Doubt he gets fired but like mostly happens he will more likely than not go be a HC, fail out, then back to being an OC somewhere where the world long forgot about him.

Edited by Fox007
Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

I'm not sure how he became one of the hottest coaching names with such a short resume.  Maybe he benefitted from the new young and upcoming craze.  Whatever it was he and Rhule don't seem to be on the same page when it comes to who can run it.

By heading up the mist prolific college offense of all time. Sure, there was a ton of talent on that team but that talent produced a pedestrian offense the year prior. Joe Burrow went from a likely late round flier pick to #1 overall.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It will be interesting to see Brady's career post-Carolina. I am assuming he is likely to get canned after this season, barring some major change at QB during the season. I see the set up coming, Rhule needs a scapegoat and Brady has the least ties to him.

IMO, Brady is not the biggest reason for our struggles offensively but he definitely has contributed over the past two seasons. I'd like to see how he rebounds after his time here and where he does. We may find out he was just elevated too early or perhaps he was never anything more than a product of being in the right place at the right time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

By heading up the mist prolific college offense of all time. Sure, there was a ton of talent on that team but that talent produced a pedestrian offense the year prior. Joe Burrow went from a likely late round flier pick to #1 overall.

Yep. This is what people ignore. LSU had all of that same talent the previous year and looked mediocre. Brady was the difference-maker. 

I’m not terribly impressed with what he has done in Carolina so far, but he is dealing with serious talent deficiencies on the OL and has not had a QB nearly good enough to make up for it. It’s unlikely that he is the primary issue. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

By heading up the mist prolific college offense of all time. Sure, there was a ton of talent on that team but that talent produced a pedestrian offense the year prior. Joe Burrow went from a likely late round flier pick to #1 overall.


Brady was an assistant coach that year. He was the passing game coordinator and wr coach.

Steve Ensminger was the OC.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Varking said:

Everywhere Rhule has been he has produced a far better defense than offense. In college I think I looked it up before, but in 7 years he produced a top 25 defense 4 out of 7 years. He produced a top 25 offense... never. 

Oh right. I must have had it the other way around. I wish we would get an offensive minded head coach for once, feels like we haven't had someone that truly knows how to run an offence for well over a decade

Edited by Second_Solution
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Tbe said:


Brady was an assistant coach that year. He was the passing game coordinator and wr coach.

Steve Ensminger was the OC.


It’s also worth noting that this is the first time Brady has been responsible for calling plays.

 

1A944FD6-7662-4035-BD28-4249E2F83182.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...