Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Desperate times call for desperate measures


NAS
 Share

Recommended Posts

56 minutes ago, Cdparr7 said:

Was a 4th round pick last year. Was pretty good at FIU. Has been on the practice squad since Week 1. Didn’t do bad during the Jets preseason. 2 TDs no INTs and 60% comp I think

Yeah and now we've seen the Jets backup White look pretty good it makes more sense why they didn't keep Morgan.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Toker Smurf said:

Yeah and now we've seen the Jets backup White look pretty good it makes more sense why they didn't keep Morgan.

I feel like Morgan and Darnold are friends and they signed Morgan because he's probably a smart guy and servers as an extra set of eyes for Darnold.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It’ll be PJ  bc they’re going to want to him to rub. I honestly can’t think of a worse game for CMC to be activated back. They’re going to run it 50x against the Pats. I hope our RBs are ready. I bet the carries breakdown will be:

CMC - 18

Hubbard - 15

Freeman - 8

Walker - 7

WRs - 3
 

Run it into the ground…

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, unicar15 said:

It’ll be PJ  bc they’re going to want to him to rub. I honestly can’t think of a worse game for CMC to be activated back. They’re going to run it 50x against the Pats. I hope our RBs are ready. I bet the carries breakdown will be:

CMC - 18

Hubbard - 15

Freeman - 8

Walker - 7

WRs - 3
 

Run it into the ground…

Abdullah?

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, unicar15 said:

It’ll be PJ  bc they’re going to want to him to rub. I honestly can’t think of a worse game for CMC to be activated back. They’re going to run it 50x against the Pats. I hope our RBs are ready. I bet the carries breakdown will be:

CMC - 18

Hubbard - 15

Freeman - 8

Walker - 7

WRs - 3
 

Run it into the ground…

Sam is out there at practice right now, suited up, so its not 100% hes not gonna play on Sunday

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, unicar15 said:

It’ll be PJ  bc they’re going to want to him to rub. I honestly can’t think of a worse game for CMC to be activated back. They’re going to run it 50x against the Pats. I hope our RBs are ready. I bet the carries breakdown will be:

CMC - 18

Hubbard - 15

Freeman - 8

Walker - 7

WRs - 3
 

Run it into the ground…

I would cream my jeans over that load distribution. Pun intended.

  • The D 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Toker Smurf said:

Definitely could be, I was just pointing out that just because the Jets cut him, he may not be utter garbage.

I'd love to see what he has, tbh.  It's not like PJ is our answer at backup let alone starter.

Ofc if Darnold is ready that's a moot point.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I actually hope PJ starts.  Rhule needs to see without a doubt that PJ is not an NFL QB.  This staff needs to see that it's not OK to go into a season without a real backup.  If you want to develop someone, make that developmental guy your THIRD QB.  Not your first or second.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...