Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

So are we allowed to use the T word and focus on the draft?


TheBigKat
 Share

Recommended Posts

54 minutes ago, TheBigKat said:

Not going to make the playoffs

 

 time to deploy TANK MODE

 every loss matters (Chargers getting Herbert) 

last years pointless wins cost us a top 3 pick

Don’t fight it, let’s just go out there and lock up a top 5 pick 

5D5F9846-B37C-4786-A6DB-927DDEFDCE3B.jpeg

Tanking is done in the off-season by a front office.  It doesn’t happen in season after the trade deadline.   These dudes have jobs.  And 99% of the roster needs to put the best tape they can out there 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Captain Morgan said:

the question is, what if there is a good left tackle at our first round pick...do you take him?

Or do you trade back for multiple picks, knowing there are no other options at left tackle?

 

I think we know what will happen.  We still won't have a left tackle.

You can only trade back if someone falls in love with a qb

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, 4Corners said:

TWO WORDS

Sam

fuging 

Howell 

I'm a UNC fan but i'm not super sold on Howell. He throws a pretty ball but I worry just like Darnold about his processing. UNC's offense is a far cry from what he'll be asked to do in the NFL. Also he's going to get himself killed in the league running like he does in college 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, SOJA said:

I'm a UNC fan but i'm not super sold on Howell. He throws a pretty ball but I worry just like Darnold about his processing. UNC's offense is a far cry from what he'll be asked to do in the NFL. Also he's going to get himself killed in the league running like he does in college 

Same here. Not convinced. Our line would have to be way better than it is now or he won't make it through half a season 

Edited by uncfan888
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • LOL... Yet again proving you can't look below anything than what you see on the surface Mock drafts ARE NOT draft grades They are what people think will happen.  They are mocking teams taking QB's in the top 5 of the draft because that's just historically how drafts go regardless of the grades on the QBs.  Almost every draft expert, even those mocking QB's going high, have said time and time again that none of these QB's actually grade out as those type of picks. This is again, where I say you don't like to actually read what I have to say, because I already explained it. 2022 the exact same thing happened, mock drafts had guys like Pickett and Willis going in the Top 5 because that's just what teams usually do, but GM's listened to their prospect grades and knew they weren't worth taking that high, so they didn't. It's not to say QB's won't go that high this year, but it's to say that they aren't graded out as elite QB prospects.  Mock drafts 
    • Have you seen the mock drafts lately?   Most of them have us taking a QB. Just because you aren't high on these QBs doesn't mean the Panthers or other teams aren't.   If you want me to be real I just think you a Tmac homer and all you care about is us drafting him. It's why you get so defensive when people mention other prospects.   Be open to other people's ideas. Nobody in this thread is saying anything bad about your boy Tmac. 
    • Oh good lord Interest doesn't mean interest in making a bad trade to take the player, that's why I had such a long post, to accurately describe why those are two different things, but you don't like to listen to that stuff.  Being interested in a player doesn't live in a vacuum. It's very simple... there isn't a #1 draft pick type of grade on any of these QB's, if there was, we'd just take them.  You can't bluff a pick everyone knows you won't make, and trying to trade the pick is the CLEAR signal that you're not taking the QB. Just because the Raiders would have interest, doesn't mean they're going to bail us out of a situation we don't want to be in, they'd be smart about it and just sit put, let us take a non QB as we'd be telling the world we're not taking one just by trying to trade the pick, and then they'd take him at #2 (either with their own pick or by trading less to get that one). Oh, and your point of "if nobody is willing to make the trade, you obviously just take the best QB" is quite literally the dumbest thing I've ever read on here. If nobody is willing to trade up to take the QB, then it's OBVIOUS that the QB isn't worth taking with that pick, so OBVIOUSLY taking the best QB there is just OBVIOUSLY stupid and a bad pick. The moral of it is if there is a QB worth taking, we're taking them and not making the trade.  If there isn't a QB worth taking there, nobody is trading up to #1 to take one, we just showed the NFL how bad of an idea that is 2 years ago, it's really not hard to see. You keep making up this mythical situation where there is a QB who has shown to be worth trading up to #1 for and we'll be able to leverage that into a trade.  But we're the most QB needy team in the league, if we end up with the #1 pick, either we are taking a QB #1 or no QB is going #1 unless we get VERY lucky and two teams in the Top 5 fall in love with one prospect and we can play them off each other and fleece one of them. But again, I can't see that happening, as if there was a QB worthy of that, we're just taking him ourselves.
×
×
  • Create New...