Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Who is QB3 in next years draft?

AU-panther

By AU-panther,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

AU-panther Mentor

AU-panther

Posted
Posted (edited)

I'm going to try and be positive here.

The Darnold experiment had 3 possible outcomes.

Option A:  He plays great, we pay him a lot of money and he becomes our franchise level QB for the next 10 years.

Option B:  He plays terrible, we eat next years cap hit and we look for a new QB.

Option C  He plays just good enough to win, when everything else goes well, and we pay him big money to be average.

Its looking like Option B, which is better than Option C.

There are some really bad teams this year ahead of us in the draft but I could see us drafting in that 8-12 range which might open up the possibility of QB 3 for us.  Who are we looking at?

 

Edited by AU-panther
spelling
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Cdparr7 Grand Master

Cdparr7

Posted
Posted

I hate UNC so it’s not easy for me to say but Howell is the best QB in this draft. He won’t go first. Corral is okay, Willis is below average, Hartman and Howell is where it’s at. 
 

I hope we get one of those two and that’s not easy to say being a Wolfpack fan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Panthero Mentor

Panthero

Posted
Posted

Man, this year is a bad year for trying to draft a qb. Rattler looks like he needs another year. Howell plays a very simple one read offense. Corral has some interesting skills but im not convinced and ive watched him play about 10 times now. 

Malik Willis? Hes a lot better now, than at Auburn, but if he were a first riund draft pick it would have been obvious at Auburn that he had legit talent, it wasnt

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • strato
      Hubbard says he might have rushed back

      By strato · Posted

      I agree it is more about the OL. If you happen to have a world beater with a great OL then that’s better obviously but you don’t need to have that.  Capable and durable guys that can get to the second level with good blocking can be plenty.  
    • Bear Hands
      Hubbard says he might have rushed back

      By Bear Hands · Posted

      I think Gibbs is special, but you’re right, some of the top investments have proven to not be much different than some 2nds and 3rds. Taylor for example is on an MVP level season. James Cook is doing better than Breece Hall for example. Raiders weren’t in a good spot to draft Jeanty. Same with the Falcons/Bijan.  You gotta swing at the right time — the investment shouldn’t come too early. You almost have to stumble into a guy mid to late rounds while building or find that guy to put you over the top when the team is finally well rounded.
    • SmokinwithWilly
      ESPN’s Benjamin Solak on Panthers LT

      By SmokinwithWilly · Posted

      Like I said in another post yesterday, the handling of the offensive line by Fitterer and mostly Morgan has been crazy. We've spent way too much money(Lewis and Hunt) to keep Bryce upright instead of using our picks in the 2nd round on JPJ and Frazier. Could have kept an injured Corbett at guard, Brady at swing, and still taken Maye as a backup, sorry Zavala. We wouldn't have taken XL, but XL hasn't been as advertised anyway, and Brooks hasn't contributed anything. Moton's extension with it's signing bonus made him uncutable. Icky's contract was due at the same time Bryce's 3rd year ended, and we all know it's extension or 5th year, and if we're going to do a 5th year, he's going to want the extension.  To me the whole thing is just ridiculous. Right now, depending on if Tepper decides to keep Bryce, it feels like we're going to have to choose between Icky and a Bryce extension. Maybe he plays on the 5th year, but I think he'll want the big money guarantee.  JMO, but if you took a look at how the contracts could potentially fall, the writing was on the wall that this could be a cash flow nightmare. Too many contract guarantees, not enough rookie contracts to offset the upcoming paydays. 
×
×
  • Create New...