Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Prediction


Cdparr7
 Share

Recommended Posts

So I’m going out on a limb here but thinking back to 2006 when Delhomme had is mysterious thumb injury.

Rhule takes the easy outs; I’m willing to bet “Darnold played hurt and has to sit out a few weeks for it to heal” gives everyone a chance to see PJ/Morgan and an excuse for losing the games. They also have an out to bring Darnold back in if it gets too bad with those two.

 

  • Pie 4
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am not sure who they will play. PJ may provide a spark, but what if he is worse than Sam?

Here is the problem, they are still close to .500 and they will still play the person that gives them the best chance to win.

If Sam is not truly injured then I am afraid that they will still play him. 
 

There will be a thought all week going through the coaches head of, “Who gives us the best chance to win?”  
Sam must be doing something throughout the week that makes them feel that he is their best option.

When game day comes Sam just reverts back to some stupid reactionary state where he makes bad decisions in key situations.

 It is a Catch 22.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Monrowed said:

I am not sure who they will play. PJ may provide a spark, but what if he is worse than Sam?

Here is the problem, they are still close to .500 and they will still play the person that gives them the best chance to win.

If Sam is not truly injured then I am afraid that they will still play him. 
 

There will be a thought all week going through the coaches head of, “Who gives us the best chance to win?”  
Sam must be doing something throughout the week that makes them feel that he is their best option.

When game day comes Sam just reverts back to some stupid reactionary state where he makes bad decisions in key situations.

 It is a Catch 22.

My theory on this before all the Sam badgers and defenders get here to start a war is:

Gase used to forbid Darnold from making checks. The NY media used to say that Darnold had no authority in the offense at all. I don’t think he knows how to make adjustments at the line. I think Brady just puts him out there like he actually has experience. In practice things are a bit more clear and execution driven. I just don’t think he knows what to do with his freedom and goes full turtle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Today was a big shift. Difference in 20-22 in the draft vs. 10-13.  Now, proceed with the tanking.  

Seriously though, how the hell did we throw in a 2nd for Sam? Even with how poorly he's done, I could've taken a 3rd+2 mid rounders.  But a 2nd is tough to swallow given it could be a top-40 pick.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Cdparr7 said:

So I’m going out on a limb here but thinking back to 2006 when Delhomme had is mysterious thumb injury.

Rhule takes the easy outs; I’m willing to bet “Darnold played hurt and has to sit out a few weeks for it to heal” gives everyone a chance to see PJ/Morgan and an excuse for losing the games. They also have an out to bring Darnold back in if it gets too bad with those two.

 

Darnold isn’t the problem. He’s just part of the problem. Rhule, Brady and Tepper are the real Problem.

  • Pie 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Rhule looks out for Rhule.  It’s what coaches do.   And actually benching Sam is risky.  Because all it does highlights his piss poor job.   

I think he tries to buy some time.  He will try to get away with blaming the OL, Joe Brady and Sam for a little longer.   And trots Sam out there.   Road game next week so he is safe.  No boo birds and empty seats because of Sam.  Hope CMC can work some magic and take a 2 yard pass all the way to pump up Sam’s stock so he can trot him back out at home vs WFT

going to PJ is problematic because even PJ level play (which is bad) is what Sam is now.  And a decent game from a PJ tier player (which they can have) is better than what Sam is doing of late.  The PJ conversation is never about PJ being good enough to be the backup….it’s how PJ playing makes Sam look.  While PJ might turn it over, PJ easily can have games where the O moves better simply because of his downfield style.   In his one start, despite the bad red zone throws….the WRs had more yards than in any other game that year.   That’s problematic if you are Rhule.   PJ is at best a practice squad player and if he can push the call downfield and Sam can’t….well, everyone has to look at Matt Rhule.  He gave up picks for Sam.  

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Ivan The Awesome said:

To be fair, Darnold should not have played. Dude was concussed and I don't know how the fug he passed the protocol. He should have been out this game, PJ probably would have moved the ball better. 

My son has been in the protocol 3 times.

You can definitely fake your way out of it if you're dead set on playing. 

For the record I never allowed my son to fake it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Ivan The Awesome said:

To be fair, Darnold should not have played. Dude was concussed and I don't know how the fug he passed the protocol. He should have been out this game, PJ probably would have moved the ball better. 

Sam said he never had symptoms of a concussion in the presser and felt great all week in that regard. 

he did acknowledge he had an injury to his shoulder and didn’t want to get into that talk.   Think he competed 2 balls past 10 yards today and they both are like 13 or so yards downfield.    Decent odds Rhule played him hurt.  Not that the outcome would have been any different if healthy. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My read is they intended to try and get points but that first run and usage of the clock was done to hedge against things going poorly. Basically they shouldn't need all that time to score since they had multiple timeouts. Dirting that second play put us in a no-win situation. Sure you can run on 3rd down but ARI had timeouts so they still likely get the same result.
    • Anyone catch Adam archuletta referring to him as a “young qb” like bitch this is year three players are in the Super Bowl by now. 
    • I never said he had a good game in the Denver game.  As you said we had a good first drive ending in Bryce throwing a slant to XL for a TD.  It was garbage time but the back shoulder throw to Coker for the late TD was a great throw.   Throws like these in bad games are why I say he "can" do it and has the physical tools.  The question is can he do it consistently, continue to improve, grow and become our QB of the future.  Up to this point that was a hard no but with a new head coach and Bryce in his 2nd year it was 100% the right call to play out the year and see if he got better.  He did.   Two games into this year is still more of the up and down quality of play and coaching but there is still plenty of potential and we have 16 more games to decide if it's worth it to continue down this path. I don't know what will happen but I know cutting him or benching him now makes zero sense on any level. I said of those last 10 games we were only blown out in 2 of them.  I'll concede the Denver game was a blow out.  So 3 blowout loses and 7 competitive games, 4 of which we won, all decided by less than a TD.  Sounds like a team growing, improving and getting better.  All I want to do is see where that leads and if those examples of starting NFL level quarterbacking can continue to improve and become more consistent.   Anyone with pride would retire?  Laughable.  Do all of you quit in your daily lives every time things get tough or don't go your way?    
×
×
  • Create New...