Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Joe Brady


ncfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Waldo said:

There is so much bad that it's hard to assign what to who. 

I'll take anything at this point but please don't forget to fire the personnel people. Play calling can't explain the moves we made this offseason. 

Define a "good play". They're all good if they work. It's hard for them to work when your offense is limited severely by a terrible OL and a terrible QB.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

Define a "good play". They're all good if they work. It's hard for them to work when your offense is limited severely by a terrible OL and a terrible QB.

Joe Brady can dial up winner plays.  But if Sam can't do what he is suppose to,  bails, throws a bad ball, etc.  Well, Joe Brady is trash. 

I mean it was just a week ogo we had former quarterbacks detaling how Sam can't do some of the most basic things a NFL QB is asked to do. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, CRA said:

well, imagine if Joe Brady isn't a main problem.  Yeah, he needs some situational work but that again is to be expected. 

So what happens if you scapegoat Joe Brady this early and then Rhule inserts one of his Baylor buddies as the interim OC....and it gets even worse (which it can).   Brady is attempting to hold back the implosion until as late as possible right now.   So it could come earlier in games and be worse. 

It can't get much worse than 3 points against the Giants and 6 points against the Patriots. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Define a "good play". They're all good if they work. It's hard for them to work when your offense is limited severely by a terrible OL and a terrible QB.

If all the opposing team knows the play. And you come out and run the play.  With no motions etc.  It’s a bad play

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Byrdman4real said:

Been saying they are running packages and not the whole playbook. That's why you see so many repeat plays. 

Doubt it but if so it's even dumber.

*Can't score*
Lets limit the play book
*Can't score worse the defense knows all the plays*

Trying to accomplish what exactly doing that then?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, CRA said:

The assistant QB coach and the passing game coordinator are both Baylor guys.  That's how you know Joe Brady and the QB coach will two of the first get thrown under the bus.   

Maybe let your OC and not your DC pick the QB next time. 

Damn. Brady and the QB coach are dead men walking. 
 

I think it would be a mistake, too.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Define a "good play". They're all good if they work. It's hard for them to work when your offense is limited severely by a terrible OL and a terrible QB.

Not going ot defend OL or QB... but I will say Joe Brady has been pretty bad. He recycles his playbook and runs multiple plays twice per game. His run concepts are very vanilla, and a bad QB has nothing to do with that. Look at how many motion and misdirection pre-snap run plays the patriots did on us on Sunday.  They were lining up two runningback and motioning one outside to pull shaq out of the box. They were running the slot reciever and TE for fake jet sweeps to get the NB running the wrong direction. Joe Brady hasnt shown a single sign of any creativity like this.

Then lets take the Giants game as an example. Just as bad of a qb and o line. They were moving the pocket at the snap. Running away from the pass rush and getting jones time to throw. poo, on one play they brought an extra lineman in to come in motion to the right side to be an extra blocker for Daniel Jones as he rolled right (with his linemane) to setup a quick hit on the boundary line.

These are microsamples of what Joe Brady just has not shown us. There is ayoutube video that was shared on this message board showing Joe Brady's receiver route trees are elementary. Some times we have 3 recievers all within 5 yards of each other.

 

The OL has been mediocre, and QB play along with it.... but JB has just been outright bad.

Edited by TheCasillas
  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Fox007 said:

Doubt it but if so it's even dumber.

*Can't score*
Lets limit the play book
*Can't score worse the defense knows all the plays*

Trying to accomplish what exactly doing that then?

This 

the limited package is giving a guy who has only been a passing game coordinator in college for 1 season with Jamar Chase Joe Burrow and Justin Jefferson.  We may be giving him a bit too much credit 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

i'm not going to say it's all on joe brady, but...

predictable playcalling woulld increase the odds of interceptions and "ambulance" passes.

predictable playcalling would make an oline less effective.

predictable play calling would make it impossible to score in the red zone.

again...not saying it's all in joe brady, but...he's a major factor as to why the panthers offense is absolutely unbearable to watch.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Define a "good play". They're all good if they work. It's hard for them to work when your offense is limited severely by a terrible OL and a terrible QB.

The body of work is what I am focused on and at this point I am at the 'chicken or egg, doesn't really matter because it's just chicken poo' place with it all. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is a good take it really is to the point dc needs to let the world see the real byoung b/c right now everyone in the media and tepper has had blinders on when it comes to young.  Its hard to even know where the panthers are at skill player wise with such horrible qb play.  I doubt it but legette may be a probowl wr he just cant throw the ball and catch it.  I am just so sick of every excuse in the book for byoung.  LIstened to a podcast and the guy was going over how many different options byoung had on the int and all of them were ok except for the one where he threw an int.  He said the play could be run by a hs qb and they would typically make a good decision. 
    • I certainly have my complaints about Canales but I'm not ready to fire him yet for a couple of reasons. First and foremost, Tepper has made this one of the least appealing jobs in the league. Morgan and Canales are here to begin with in large part because guys higher on the wish list take other jobs. If you fire Canales you're gonna end up replacing him with another third tier candidate who wasn't being seriously considered by other teams with openings. That's just the reality of the situation right now as far as I can tell. Secondly, despite plenty of room for critique, we are 6-6 despite the worst QB play in the league. That's really damn hard to pull off in the modern NFL. Especially when your D isn't dominant. Our D is greatly improved but is still a slightly below average overall defense ranking 18th in yards per game allowed and 20th in points allowed. Going 6-6 with atrocious QB play and slightly below average defensive play is pretty damn impressive. Even more impressive when you also factor in that we're in the red on turnovers differential at -3. When you combine league worst QB play with slightly below average D and negative turnover differential honestly you'd expect to be in play for the #1 overall pick, not 6-6 and having just played a game that a win would have you leading the division. So yeah, even though I'm far from sold I advocate for patience with Canales for the time being. If you ask me if I'm bringing him back next year, I'm a yes barring a catastrophic meltdown down the stretch which admittedly is very much a possibility.
×
×
  • Create New...