Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Joe Brady


ncfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Waldo said:

There is so much bad that it's hard to assign what to who. 

I'll take anything at this point but please don't forget to fire the personnel people. Play calling can't explain the moves we made this offseason. 

Define a "good play". They're all good if they work. It's hard for them to work when your offense is limited severely by a terrible OL and a terrible QB.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

Define a "good play". They're all good if they work. It's hard for them to work when your offense is limited severely by a terrible OL and a terrible QB.

Joe Brady can dial up winner plays.  But if Sam can't do what he is suppose to,  bails, throws a bad ball, etc.  Well, Joe Brady is trash. 

I mean it was just a week ogo we had former quarterbacks detaling how Sam can't do some of the most basic things a NFL QB is asked to do. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, CRA said:

well, imagine if Joe Brady isn't a main problem.  Yeah, he needs some situational work but that again is to be expected. 

So what happens if you scapegoat Joe Brady this early and then Rhule inserts one of his Baylor buddies as the interim OC....and it gets even worse (which it can).   Brady is attempting to hold back the implosion until as late as possible right now.   So it could come earlier in games and be worse. 

It can't get much worse than 3 points against the Giants and 6 points against the Patriots. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Define a "good play". They're all good if they work. It's hard for them to work when your offense is limited severely by a terrible OL and a terrible QB.

If all the opposing team knows the play. And you come out and run the play.  With no motions etc.  It’s a bad play

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Byrdman4real said:

Been saying they are running packages and not the whole playbook. That's why you see so many repeat plays. 

Doubt it but if so it's even dumber.

*Can't score*
Lets limit the play book
*Can't score worse the defense knows all the plays*

Trying to accomplish what exactly doing that then?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, CRA said:

The assistant QB coach and the passing game coordinator are both Baylor guys.  That's how you know Joe Brady and the QB coach will two of the first get thrown under the bus.   

Maybe let your OC and not your DC pick the QB next time. 

Damn. Brady and the QB coach are dead men walking. 
 

I think it would be a mistake, too.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Define a "good play". They're all good if they work. It's hard for them to work when your offense is limited severely by a terrible OL and a terrible QB.

Not going ot defend OL or QB... but I will say Joe Brady has been pretty bad. He recycles his playbook and runs multiple plays twice per game. His run concepts are very vanilla, and a bad QB has nothing to do with that. Look at how many motion and misdirection pre-snap run plays the patriots did on us on Sunday.  They were lining up two runningback and motioning one outside to pull shaq out of the box. They were running the slot reciever and TE for fake jet sweeps to get the NB running the wrong direction. Joe Brady hasnt shown a single sign of any creativity like this.

Then lets take the Giants game as an example. Just as bad of a qb and o line. They were moving the pocket at the snap. Running away from the pass rush and getting jones time to throw. poo, on one play they brought an extra lineman in to come in motion to the right side to be an extra blocker for Daniel Jones as he rolled right (with his linemane) to setup a quick hit on the boundary line.

These are microsamples of what Joe Brady just has not shown us. There is ayoutube video that was shared on this message board showing Joe Brady's receiver route trees are elementary. Some times we have 3 recievers all within 5 yards of each other.

 

The OL has been mediocre, and QB play along with it.... but JB has just been outright bad.

Edited by TheCasillas
  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Fox007 said:

Doubt it but if so it's even dumber.

*Can't score*
Lets limit the play book
*Can't score worse the defense knows all the plays*

Trying to accomplish what exactly doing that then?

This 

the limited package is giving a guy who has only been a passing game coordinator in college for 1 season with Jamar Chase Joe Burrow and Justin Jefferson.  We may be giving him a bit too much credit 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

i'm not going to say it's all on joe brady, but...

predictable playcalling woulld increase the odds of interceptions and "ambulance" passes.

predictable playcalling would make an oline less effective.

predictable play calling would make it impossible to score in the red zone.

again...not saying it's all in joe brady, but...he's a major factor as to why the panthers offense is absolutely unbearable to watch.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Define a "good play". They're all good if they work. It's hard for them to work when your offense is limited severely by a terrible OL and a terrible QB.

The body of work is what I am focused on and at this point I am at the 'chicken or egg, doesn't really matter because it's just chicken poo' place with it all. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I thought he had a few really nice flashes.  I can see him showing out this year 
    • I have heard that before--when standing in front of a full body mirror at Old Navy.  I said it, actually. Seriously, Let's go on what we know. There is reason for optimism that exceeds random opinions and negativity: 1. Last year, the offense was the priority and the interior offensive line was the focal point. Morgan addressed it in free agency and the draft. They improved.  2.  Last year, Canales pulled Young after 2 games and replaced him with an established veteran.  Instead of giving up on Young, he developed him, primarily focusing on his footwork and timing.  Continued development in his fundamentals should result in improved play.  (this is significant because some athletes rely on natural ability and do not adapt well.  They resort to old habits. This means that Bryce is "teachable" and is willing to face adversity and fight through it.  That is what you want in a QB.) 3. Morgan drafted a raw talent at WR; and we all knew he was raw.  Huddlers are already calling it a bust, but his productivity numbers were in line with the other WRs drafted around where he was drafted.  So, yes, he was a bit disappointing, but what part of "Raw" is not understood here?  Evil Bryce, then inconsistent Dalton, then good Bryce--all while facing the top defensive backs--and let's not forget about his lingering injuries--and we should understand XL's productivity.  Morgan was looking for a home run based on XL's 1-season productivity and his freakish athleticism, but I always thought we would not know what we have until year 2.  TMac alone will make XL better--a solid #2. 4.  If you blame Morgan for drafting XL, you must give him credit for making Coker a priority free agent.  In my view, he addressed WR in 2024 pretty effectively in the long view.  5.  Let's look at the rest of the draft.  Brooks?  The best RB in the draft in round 2?  Morgan was attempting to build a solid run game behind Bryce.  Wallace was a very solid third round pick at LB. Sanders is a strong TE for a fourth round pick. 6.  Not much is being said about the development of Chau Smith-Wade.  His improvement mirrors Bryce Young's, actually.  In his first 8 games, his PFF rating was 36.5.  In the final 9 games, his PFF rating was 66.7.   7.  With so many needs, Morgan hit the UDFA market with success. In addition to Coker, Demani Richardson got 400+ snaps and had a 60.1 PFF grade, including an interception. 8.  In free agency, Morgan spent big bucks on Guards, a move that made his QB better. He added David Moore, Nijman,  He signed Clowney, Wonnum, Robinson, Jewel, Chaisson, Fuller, Scott, D. Jackson, Dionte Johnson, etc.  A few years of Fitterer left him with more holes that players.  Some did not work out, but he did all this on a budget (after he splurged on Lewis and Hunt).  It is hard to get a free agent to come to a team that loses--so in some cases, Morgan had to overpay or accept questionable players. Morgan's first year as a GM demonstrated an understanding of the game like we have not seen since Polian, before his lost it. Canales, on the other hand, should be rated by the improvement of players.  Zavala, Ekwonu, Mays, Young, Smith-Wade, Coker, Wallace--all improved.  He had to overcome major losses such as D. Brown, Shaq, Dionte Johnson, Corbett--and we saw growth.  Despite all this team went through, after 8 games of disarray, This team finished 4-5 with close losses to both Super Bowl teams.  Frankly, I do not know how he did it. This year was better.  The WR room is solid with depth.  The OL room is solid with depth.  The TE room is as good as it has been in a while.  The RB room has the potential to be as good as it was when we had 28 and 34.  DBs?  Better.  DL?  Better.  Edge?  better.  The bottom of the roster?  Much better. We really don't know what we have yet, and that makes this offseason exciting.      
    • Here you go. 2 yards. Bryce Sneak.mp4
×
×
  • Create New...