Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Cam to Rhule after penalty thoughts?


BurnNChinn
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, KSpan said:

Such a comment would be specifically telling him not to take his helmet off again given that that's what Cam was penalized for. Seems a pretty cut and dry thing that doesn't tread on Cam's personality, as I don't recall him ever getting such a penalty before.

It's the "Don't do it again" for me. It's kind of needlessly aggressive. 

 

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is really amazing that you are all letting this dumb troll, Sheena Quick, whip you into a frenzy over NOTHING. I mean literally NOTHING.

If you showed this ignorant thread to Cam or Rhule, they'd likely roll their eyes or laugh.

There is no dumb arbitrary line in the sand here. This is all gray.

Calm the fug down.

@rayzor Just lock this stupid poo.

  • Pie 2
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, rico6 said:

It's the "Don't do it again" for me. It's kind of needlessly aggressive. 

 

There are plenty of situations in sports where a play is ill-advised but it works and the coach tells the player not to do it again, despite the fact that they loved the outcome. Look at the way the players, especially Cam, responded the rest of the game. It's fine. It shouldn't need to be said, but it's fair that he said it, since he'd say it to anyone else who did it. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

This is really amazing that you are all letting this dumb troll, Sheena Quick, whip you into a frenzy over NOTHING. I mean literally NOTHING.

If you showed this ignorant thread to Cam or Rhule, they'd likely roll their eyes or laugh.

There is no dumb arbitrary line in the sand here. This is all gray.

Calm the fug down.

@rayzor Just lock this stupid poo.

You don't need to poo on Sheena Quick. She is what she is. She's not a troll; she has a decent amount of connections and she's using it to chase clout until it turns into something more. That is a valid strategy in this day and age. Knowing that, it should be easy to understand that the majority of her tweets are meant to be provocative. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Also, Sheena Quick is basically a hack at this stage of her career.

She is just editing to create controversy where none exists. Sooooo....pretty much she can go fug herself. She knows exactly what she is doing.

Yeah I didn’t mean anything bad towards Cam just wondered why she worded it like that. Like she was trying to make Cam look like a bad player. Like damn he just got here be quiet.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, rico6 said:

It's the "Don't do it again" for me. It's kind of needlessly aggressive. 

 

I'd bet significant money it was a lighthearted moment and whatever was said, even if 'don't do it again' is verbatim, was put out in such a manner.

Any way of it I'd be very surprised if there was any kind of issue that arose down the road, either with Cam or Rhule. The fact that Rhule called Cam at all means he knows what side his bread is buttered on and will handle things accordingly, and Cam is a mature player. They will be fine.

Edited by KSpan
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Keep away from North Winston,  you should be fine. West Winston towards Clemmins is cool. If you're ever at the Peterscreek Walmart, the Pepsi guy is 😎. 
    • Game-winning drives have been credited to QBs since the beginning of time
    • A lot of people have been slobbing all over this last draft but I hate the way that Fitterer/Morgan have built this offense since drafting Bryce. Anyone with eyes knew our IOL was crap but we didn't invest there and instead took project receivers and an injured RB. If you want a lesson in how build for your QB wrong, IMO, this was it. Draft him, protect him, THEN get him weapons. Its pretty much a rule, draft interior linemen, pay tackles. We're paying everyone. We had the opportunity to draft a center instead of Brooks, or perhaps instead of trading up for XL, trade back and take 2 guards/center. We could have paid Lewis and still drafted 2, but Hunt at 100m was just an overpay. And it's not like the guys many of us were begging us to draft were long shots. They're solid starters from day 1. Injuries happen. That's why all your starters can't be high value players. You need rookie contracts mixed in to be able to absorb those inevitable losses on the line. An offensive line playing an entire season together is an abnormality.  Factor into that also paying Moton 44m this offseason with a huge signing bonus when we didnt need to do right now to do him a "solid".  Now we have to sign Icky and possibly Bryce and it's a mess with more money tied up in the offense, inevitable cuts and dead cap coming. That's not even factoring in shifting Corbett to C last year after major injury to start at a position he's never played for an NFL season. It's all stuff that was foreseeable and pretty easily avoided.  The $$ and picks we've spent trying to surround Bryce outside of Tmac (Mitchell and Horn are TBD) have been used inefficiently IMO. Smarter drafting and FA with the line could have let us get more reliable weapons than XL and Sanders in FA. It might not be popular opinion, but I'll take a Bersin with hands that can get 6-8 85% of the time vs a big play XL with greasy fingers.  The part about hitting guys in stride was more about placement, which Bryce has struggled with. Obviously not every route is run to be hit in stride, but they do need to have the ball placed well to give the receivers a chance to do something after the catch. I just used Hill as an example because he's the biggest YAC threat I could think of over the past 5 years.   Receivers can feast on dink and dunk if it's schemed right. But to make it work, that vertical threat has to be there, if not the deep pass then the high speed routes that can spring someone for the huge YAC to keep the safeties from cheating into that 20 yard box all game.  I hope DC and Bryce can keep up what they did in the last game and it isnt just an Atlanta thing. But no matter what, I really want to see some better long term strategy coming from the FO. 
×
×
  • Create New...