Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Would you buy "stock" in the Panthers?


PanthersATL
 Share

Recommended Posts

For only the 6th time, the Green Bay Packers are selling "shares" to the public, at $300 apiece (max of 200 per person, including any previously purchased).

Reading deeper into the terms, it says that these are not shares in the traditional, investment sense. Sounds more of a collectors item, suitable for framing.

Question: How much would you pay to have a single shareholder vote in the Panthers business, knowing Tepper will maintain a minimum of 51% of outstanding votes as primary owner?  (One vote per household, max)

https://www.packers.com/news/green-bay-packers-stock-sale-begins-november-16-2021

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would never buy stock in a team the way it works for the Packers because it isn't actually stock it's just a massive waste of money. There is literally zero value in it. I would consider buying stock in the Panthers or another team if you could actually get dividends on it and sell it easily. However based on the team's history I certainly wouldn't buy stock in the Panthers any time soon. Would really need to see a franchise changing turn around otherwise it would just be a letdown as has been par for the course for this team in its history.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, KatsAzz said:

If what i am reading about the "Stock" is factual,why any sane person would buy a "Stock" that is not a "Stock" and actually has no value is beyond me.

So they can tell people they are part owners of the Packers. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You’re playing madden we’re talking real football stuff…. He does have you seen his special on internet he def thinks he’s getting paid 
    • Without the team having an identity kinda hard to predict what they value.  They either are really trying to build a balanced team, or preparing for another swing at qb if Bryce doesn’t pan out. Seems like we value the o line but the $ spent there has been underwhelming besides Lewis, you could say it’s because of injuries but still hasn’t been worth the investment. as already stated, the whole handling of Bryce young as a whole has been ass backwards, we spent the years we’re supposed to take advantage of having a qb with a lower cap hit, building the team up to be adequate. now It appears, key word appears, the saints have done it correctly, which is painful to even think about. Regardless, I hope the front office has paid attention to qb contracts recently, such as Tua, Kyler, Daniel jones(pre colts) and don’t settle for subpar qb play at franchise qb rates    
    • This is the flaw in your logic.  Cutting 3 of our best players will somehow move us from whatever we are to "compete". Even the most Young super fans are not predicting a ceiling above top 10-12, and that will not nearly cut it.  Someone will need to break the log jam of QBs getting nothing or North of 50. Our qb is at best a middle ground, lets hope it will be us that also manage to pay the worth at about 100 over 3 years.  And before you jump me, yes that is only of he improves.
×
×
  • Create New...