Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

How does this Cb situation play out going foward?


WOW!!
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, TheRumGone said:

We could try to upgrade mlb but we should not be spending first round picks unless we draft in the 20s. Linebackers have short shelf life. Shaq is gonna last a bit longer because he didn’t play much his first 3 years. Rather use that position in the 2nd or 3rd. 

I still say LT in round 1 IF Cam is re-signed, which means that he played well.  While Morgan, Beason, and Luke were first rounders, we were talking about possible free agents.  I dunno, but I am a believer in that Alpha MLB--maybe just old school.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, MHS831 said:

I still say LT in round 1 IF Cam is re-signed, which means that he played well.  While Morgan, Beason, and Luke were first rounders, we were talking about possible free agents.  I dunno, but I am a believer in that Alpha MLB--maybe just old school.

I’m good with LT in the first if we have stability in the qb room too. Honestly depending where we pick I’d be down with the center from Iowa. I’ve said center has been the biggest issue on the line for me personally. I think we’re gonna trade down unless they fall in love with a qb like Malik or someone like Malik might be available after a trade down who knows. A couple options we can go with.
 

luke was great but he lasted 8 seasons and was a mess the last 3 years with concussions. That position is just rough and spending a top 10 pick on a mlb again is not how I wanna build the team. That goes for runningbacks as well.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

I still say LT in round 1 IF Cam is re-signed, which means that he played well.  While Morgan, Beason, and Luke were first rounders, we were talking about possible free agents.  I dunno, but I am a believer in that Alpha MLB--maybe just old school.

I hope if Cam is successful we pick at the bottom of the draft. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, MHS831 said:

They really do---so having 7 stud CBs should not be the way to go...I do not see Nixon, Roy, or Hoskins in that second DT role yet.  We may try to re-sign Jones?

DaQuan Jones has helped solidify the line. I hope we can keep him. At 29 he has some good years left. He has been an asset.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, mav1234 said:

Carter is one of the worst players on our D it usually seems, but, I think we hide him well and barring a later round rookie being a steal, I think MLB is an area we can't afford to invest deeply in, so we keep him

Really?? I just don't see it.. Carter has been fine and no major mistakes..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The last time we extended a player after one career season when we had a young capable player poised to take his spot, we ended up with the Robby Anderson extension. Let Jackson chase his payday elsewhere. We've set ourselves up well to buffer his loss. And he might recoup a 3rd round comp for good measure. There are a lot of cb needy teams. Plus we have to make room for Horn in the lineup. Hell, we don't need to even resign Gilmore but for the right price I'd be fine with it. But even he's a luxury.

Horn, Bouye and Hartsfield are a trio that would have a lot of teams envious. Gilmore and Keith Taylor Jr are fantastic depth. Then whoever wins out between Thomas Oliver and Pride would complete the roster. Obviously you'd love to keep every good starter but finding opportunities to replace players with competent players on rookie deals is how you keep a healthy cap sheet and form a complete team.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • or you could call him Bomanicious   I'm going with King Tet
    • T-Mac put up good numbers for 3 consecutive seasons on teams without a good QB situation, and in an environment where T-Mac got game planned against weekly and still performed. Teams threw all kinds of defensive coverages against T-Mac, and he still found ways week in and week out to contribute at a high level. XL was basically a 1-year wonder. Doesn't mean he cant be great (and I think him & T-Mac will compliment each other well), but i think T-Mac is the more polished of the 2 right now. This certainly isn't a perfect comparison, but I hope XL & T-Mac can approximate what we had with Smitty & Moose (Although i think T-Macs ceiling is higher than Moose and XLs ceiling is lower than Smitty). Both those guys were multiple Pro Bowlers and even All-Pro. T-Mac & XL have a long way to go to actually being comparable, but the potential is there. And regardless of how this season turns out, you can actually see a strategic plan being executed. On paper, I think this offensive roster has as much talent as any Panthers team since 2017. Defense is still a question mark, and it's unrealistic to think we will go from being historically bad to great in 1 year, but based on historical and statistical data, we stand a much better chance of turning the defense around in 1 year than the offense. I still want us to potentially add at S, CB, and ILB, but this roster is exponentially better than the roster heading into the 2023 season. Which still begs the question of how & why the team thought they were in a good position to trade all the way up. Regardless, it's in the past, and while the past 2 years have mostly sucked, we are strategically in a much better position than we have been in years. This is easily the best WR group since 2020 IMO (Moore, Anderson, Samuel). I'm super excited about what T-Mac can bring to this offense and team, and I'm really hoping we continue to build off where we ended last year offensively, and hopefully we've made enough improvements on defense to be competitive. I've also been vocal for the most part in supporting BY9. He came into an awful situation and to a team that was in no position to make such a trade.   Still, this is Year 3. And this is a team that IMHO has both the talent & depth on offense to score and score a lot. Most QBs that ever amount to anything are competing by Year 3. There are no excuses for the offense not to perform. I think BY9 knows full well what's riding on this year in terms of his long term future.  And I think T-Mac is a massive piece in helping Bryce and the team get over the hump and back into playoff contention.  
×
×
  • Create New...