Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Our remaining schedule


Verge
 Share

Recommended Posts

We are 5-6, we realistically need to be 9-8 to have a shot at a wildcard. Do you think with out remaining schedule we can do it? We would have to sweep NO and beat the Bucs at least one. 

@MIA 
vsATL
@BUFF 
vsTB 
@NO 
@TB  

I think with the explosiveness we saw from Cam, and gettting healthier, we can make a push. I have a very hard time believing we will go into Buffalo and win, or sweep TB, but the others look largely winnable. All comes down to this teams perseverance, and coaching (unfortunately). 

Image

  • Pie 5
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, pantherj said:

Buffalo, and the two TB games will be losses imo. That's 5-9. The other games are 50/50. I think we're probably headed to 7-10.

Still the main point is even if you grant 9-8 the other teams there have already beaten us and would have the tie breaker. its not just one team either, its not just two teams either....all this playoff talk is just arbitrary numbers without consideration of any other team and whats actually going on elsewhere in the league.

49ers were out of the playoff picture until recently too and are there above us too at 5-5

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've got Miami, Atlanta and NO, that's it.  Now knowing us we will lose one of these and pull an upset versus TB or the Bills.  Any way you slice it though, I can't get us another 4 wins.  Yesterday was about as much of a lock of a win as there could have been.  We pissed it away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

9-8 would still be dicey. We can probably only lose one more game and have a legit good shot at the playoffs. We lose two and we're gonna need a lot of help due to tie breakers.

And the team that just beat us isn't out of it yet either. As they said on the broadcast we have the hardest remaining schedule and WFT has one of the easiest left. They are 4-6 with Seattle, Raiders, EaglesX2, Dallas, and Giants.

If the WFT that stomped Tampa and beat us shows up they are 9-8 if you just hand them 2 Cowboys losses and have the tie breaker over us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://www.sportingnews.com/us/nfl/news/nfl-standings-playoff-picture-week-11/11lwoin8pkdxy1vcx0endkffzt

10th now from 7th to start the week. This is one of the craziest years though with so many teams with the same record or within 1 game of each other in the middle of the NFC. Usually you have a number of 2-14 teams or 4-12 but a lot of 5 win teams already.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, countryboi said:

with how messy every team is this season, we can win every game and lose every game. I dont like the idea of listing games as automatic losses or wins because thats how we lost yesterday.

Some teams can happily do that and be more correct than not. The Panthers have only been that team one year at all in their existence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just look at the size of the offensive lines and the running backs of the teams we are up against. 

I'm looking at that schedule and saying we beat the Falcons, the #28 rushing offense. The Saints sit at #25 but they are better than that. Miami is at #22 and that could be problematic. The WTFs vaulted to #20 based on their performance against us.

If we can't stop the run, it won't matter if we have Cam in at QB and CMC as RB. Those guys will just stay on the bench while the other team walks up and down the field, eating the clock and putting up 24-28 points.

We've been found out and exposed. And we don't have the offensive line to post much more than 21 points, much less a receiving corps. DJ Moore is our only reliable receiver not wearing the number 22. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Why are most NFL refs senior citizens lol
    • I can't speak to the sample size on the double ACL tears, I could look into it but I am unsure about the quality of data I am able to find. Anecdotally, I don't think that is common for sure.  Well one giant red flag for Dobbins is that of the 3-5 serious injuries he has had in his NFL career, 100% of them have been the same leg. That's not good and it doesn't bode well for his longevity at all. As I have said several hundred times in this forum(in this case it will be in regards to Thomas Davis), outliers are memorable for a reason....because they are outliers. You don't base your decision making on outliers. That's.....stupid. I am also not high on Etienne but he does play special teams and Brooks does not. Currently, I couldn't blame anyone in the FO for choosing a 3rd string RB that can play special teams and has actually played more than 23 career snaps in the NFL in 2+ seasons.  I am not advocating for cutting Brooks but I don't think it's a player I would consider for anything other than a 3rd string role(and likely competing for it, at that) if I am building a roster for 2026. It's not like they are going to get to see him at 100% in 2026.
    • I'm not going to argue against black helmets, but love our silver helmets. No one has anything similar. If you took all the logos off all 32 team's helmets, you could pick out our helmet easy. 
×
×
  • Create New...