Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The money part of firing Rhule


Chiefzack
 Share

Recommended Posts

45 minutes ago, NanuqoftheNorth said:

As far as Rhule's contract, it simply shouldn't make a big difference in Tepper's decision making process.  The amount of money we're talking about amounts to almost nothing in terms of Tepper's net worth.

My thing is if he's thinking over whether to give one more year, he might be more willing to pull the trigger easier If he can get out at 50-60%.

This guy uses coupons at fast food restaurants and makes his friends pay for him, don't be quick to assume he's ready to just burn 50 million dollars.

25 million maybe, but 50 million is a $HITTON of money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Chiefzack said:

My thing is if he's thinking over whether to give one more year, he might be more willing to pull the trigger easier If he can get out at 50-60%.

This guy uses coupons at fast food restaurants and makes his friends pay for him, don't be quick to assume he's ready to just burn 50 million dollars.

25 million maybe, but 50 million is a $HITTON of money.

Perhaps Tepper is that tight with his organization's money.  Guess we'll find out soon enough.  Not much longer until the Panthers season will be coming to an end.  At that point Tepper will have a decision to make when it comes to Rhule.  

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don’t think it’s a money thing as much as it’s a image thing. I don’t think Tepper wants to look stupid and wants to be patient. I think he would spend twice the money today if he knew it was the right choice and wouldn’t get chastised by every talking head on TV that needs something to talk about in the off season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You all are thinking of it the wrong way.

 

Think of it in terms of net loss.

 

Fire Rhule - Net loss of 50 million

Keep Rhule - loss of fans, merch sales, concessions, appearances, and all the other $$ this team makes for many seasons.

 

I'd wager the second one is more than 50 million. 

 

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Zod said:

You all are thinking of it the wrong way.

 

Think of it in terms of net loss.

 

Fire Rhule - Net loss of 50 million

Keep Rhule - loss of fans, merch sales, concessions, appearances, and all the other $$ this team makes for many seasons.

 

I'd wager the second one is more than 50 million. 

For the first season since moving here, I have not attended one single game in person. I have watched all of them on TV though. I think Baylor/Temple college coach Matt Rhule has shown us that he is not ready for the NFL ( neither would I be ). Lets move on and get a NFL worthy coaching staff. The Carolinas deserves it.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, Zod said:

You all are thinking of it the wrong way.

 

Think of it in terms of net loss.

 

Fire Rhule - Net loss of 50 million

Keep Rhule - loss of fans, merch sales, concessions, appearances, and all the other $$ this team makes for many seasons.

 

I'd wager the second one is more than 50 million. 

 

What Fitters does moving forward is more important. We need talent and franchise players. I'm not really sure how he's going to go get that with Rhule having total control and running a college program. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tickets and concessions aren't as much as people think actually.  I think average team makes 7 mill from tickets and like 4 to 5 mill on concessions and after expenses is single digit profit.   It's all about profit sharing and TV deals and big corporate sponsers.   Sadly BofA being in a transplant town also means tickets will keep being sold and concessions when we suck. 

Anyway I don't think Tepper bought this franchise to make money.  It's a rich guy hobby.  Retirement.  NFL teams are worth so much now it's not like you can make a ton of profit buying them.  We just have to hope he doesn't get bored and move on lol.  I don't think firing Rhule impacts this guy at all.  He's made more money in the pandemic probably than before. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Chiefzack said:

If Tepper decided to pull the plug after this season, a big consideration is Matt Rhule is due 5 years 100% guaranteed at $10 million... so 50 million

If I'm not mistaken, those buyouts usually don't equal "coach gets a check" there's terms that usually say if terminated, you can accept this lump sum amount or get payments of the remaining balance over 10-12 years, but if you accept payments you cannot accept another job.

 

I'm just wondering if Matt's contract is as iron clad as made out? Usually most coaches don't ever usually get 100% of that guaranteed amount unless they take payments, so they get a lump sum of 50-60%.

I'll take 25 million and pack my bags.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...