Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Hey, Tepper, next time hire a grown up coach


rayzor
 Share

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, rayzor said:

This is a big thing. I have no problem hiring guys you know and have worked with before, but Rhule takes it way too far.

His whole team would be made up of coaches and players from Baylor and Temple if it were up to him.

 

He's pretty close besides the rando Joe Brady and Sean Ryan hires. He inherited Moton/Shaq/CMC/Burns. Only Temple pay off has been Reddick and he's not gonna re-sign/we can't afford him after Robby and Darnold's shitty contracts. Rhule wanted full control with the JETS and even they were like nah dude, also give us 3 draft picks for Darnold who you decided you liked after one Zoom meeting

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, rayzor said:

This is a big thing. I have no problem hiring guys you know and have worked with before, but Rhule takes it way too far.

His whole team would be made up of coaches and players from Baylor and Temple if it were up to him.

One of the reasons I like Hackett so much is that he's got the connections to build a hell of a good staff.

As an example, Hackett was previously on a staff with longtime OL coach Juan Castillo.

Castillo is currently with the Bears, so pretty good chance he's available next year.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Adb6368 said:

Every seat to every game of this year has already been paid for. It’s just a matter of whether those people that paid full price can recoup pennies on their dollar or whether they no show that is the question. 

This is what so many people don't understand.  Tepper gets his attendance money before the season even starts.  He doesn't care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, hepcat said:

I think they’ll have to move on. This team is a mess. There’s some good candidates out there. 

Nathaniel Hackett

Matt Eberflus 

Brian Daboll 

Bryon Leftwich

Kellen Moore (with a highly experienced veteran DC)

Guys I would get excited about. I like Eberflus the best, but Hackett might be the best to develop a QB. 

Eric Bieniemy would be a great name on that list, too.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, BrianS said:

This is what so many people don't understand.  Tepper gets his attendance money before the season even starts.  He doesn't care.

But not day of sales. Those are not shared and do matter.

The thing about billionaires is they tend to have egos to match their bank accounts. This is his team and it represents him in many ways. He cares, now we need to see him un-fug the mess he made.

If Tepper didn't care at all Cam wouldn't be back and we would have had to watch PJ and Barkley. Caring and being good/competent are not mutually inclusive.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

One of the reasons I like Hackett so much is that he's got the connections to build a hell of a good staff.

As an example, Hackett was previously on a staff with longtime OL coach Juan Castillo.

Castillo is currently with the Bears, so pretty good chance he's available next year.

That's some pretty good second level connections reasoning there! We've been missing that around here!

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Waldo said:

But not day of sales. Those are not shared and do matter.

The thing about billionaires is they tend to have egos to match their bank accounts. This is his team and it represents him in many ways. He cares, now we need to see him un-fug the mess he made.

If Tepper didn't care at all Cam wouldn't be back and we would have had to watch PJ and Barkley. Caring and being good/competent are not mutually inclusive.

Honestly, at this point I want to see Barkley. Just for variety.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Just because all draft picks are a gamble doesn't mean you don't have a better chance at hitting on a better player the higher you're drafting. It would literally be like someone saying, I'll give you 1 or 2 free spins on a slot machine, and you say you'll take the 1 because you're not likely to win anything anyways with 1 or 2, so why bother? The Cowboys desperately wanted T-Mac, but because they were 4 picks behind us, they weren't able to get him.  If you told Cowboys fans that had they lost 2 more games last year in a lost season, that it would get them the player they wanted so badly, would they in retrospect go back and lose those games to get their guy? 95% of them would take that trade off in a heartbeat, and the others who wouldn't are the fans who would rather enjoy an extra win or two in a poo season to then set themselves up to be better for the next decade. I also think the fans who argue against this thinking, get too caught up in the "well that means you're going to be rooting against us late in the season even if we still have a shot at the playoffs." Which isn't true, it's saying if you're telling me right now we'd make the playoffs but lose in the first round, that I'd rather end up 8-9 or 9-8 and just miss the playoffs because in our opinion, the benefits that come along with that outweigh the benefit of the players getting 1 game of playoff experience.
    • In relation to tanking. I think you can count on one hand the number of people here who actually want us to lose football games. When accounting for it across the fanbase it amounts to maybe 2% of the entire Panthers fanbase. But you engage with some internet trolls and think haters are coming out of the woodwork and hey look at that it's all a conspiracy that leads to Bryce Young haters. Do you hear yourself sir? If it sounds ridiculous that's because it is. I mean at this point do you see Bryce haters in your dreams? As far as the culture of this franchise goes we seem to be doing better in that department via what we are building right now and with the people we have in place. But we also shouldn't just make assumptions just yet either. The rubber still needs to meet the road. And going back to previous seasons I think we can acknowledge although tanking obviously isn't a thing there were some times where we thought our culture was improving but really it wasn't. Yes I'm looking directly at some of those wins under Wilks. If the culture had truly changed we would not have lost to the Steelers who have been mediocre for years at home the way we did and they were starting Mitch Trubisky ffs. We did not change our culture for the better and we won games that ultimately meant nothing. It was just a brief mirage. We've done this for years now. The harsh truth of the matter is the Panthers have not had a winning season or been to the playoffs in going on 8 years but in those years they've been trying to convince themselves they aren't poo but in the process all they've done throughout most of that time period is squander better draft position and we were still the worst team in the league for our troubles. At the end of the day we should be able to just be adults and reconcile with that. And no that isn't being "pro tank" or any other boogeyman term it's simply recognizing reality.
    • He's an asset in a game manager role. But as soon as you have to ask him to go out there and try to make plays and not just take what the defense is giving him... well, Darnolding happens.
×
×
  • Create New...