Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Nobody talking about Minshew?


BurnNChinn
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, trueblade said:

1. Even Darnold looked good against the Jets.

2. Minshew's problem has always been consistency. He'll look great a couple of games, then look terrible. You want to see it for more than one week. If anything, his performance today might cause Hurts's ankle to need a little more time to heal.

 

He's played for the JAGS!  Is that the organization you want to judge for consistency?  Really?

The stat you need to understand is that for the two years Minshew was in Jacksonville they only won 7 games.  However, despite benching him repeatedly they won ZERO games with him on the bench.

Here's a little deeper dive into his stats:

image.thumb.png.f3d6fc9be94948a23f850fd1aec1a23a.png

There are three stats there which I find interesting.

One, his completion percentage.  It increased dramatically in year two.  That's a great sign for a young QB growing into the NFL.

Two, his TD%.  At 4.6 for his career, it looks very much like another QB who is good but not great, Ryan Tannehill.    Good but not great?  I can stand a bit of that.

Three, his INT%.  At 1.4 for his career, it's amazing.  Rodgers is one of the best you'll ever see at not turning it over, and his career average is 1.3%.  Tom Brady is at 1.8%.

Completes the ball, throws TD's, doesn't throw picks?  Yes please.

Big fan of his.  I wanted him way, way more than Darnold.  For reference, take a look at the guy we traded for on those same stats.

image.thumb.png.e5866abb6a805cc4ead5eece15c7fe61.png

 

  • Pie 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Cpt slay a ho said:

Minshew his rookie year, 16tds-5int the following year, def has shown more than most your JAG qbs 

Definitely  a jag Qb.. I'm glad he had a okay rookie year.. Still he is a backup with little to no physical talent to speak of.. If you want a poor man's Ryan Fitzpatrick have at it..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

Definitely  a jag Qb.. I'm glad he had a okay rookie year.. Still he is a backup with little to no physical talent to speak of.. If you want a poor man's Ryan Fitzpatrick have at it..

Idk how that qualifies as ok when most your top picks are generally throwing more ints than tds out the gate. I’d like to see Minshew get the chances guys like Sam and Teddy got before I’d label him a career backup 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Cpt slay a ho said:

Minshew his rookie year, 16tds-5int the following year, def has shown more than most your JAG qbs 

Your posting stats without context, he put up a bunch of garbage time numbers while getting beat by double digits. Both Luton and Glennon came in and also had good games statistically.
 

 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, Cpt slay a ho said:

Idk how that qualifies as ok when most your top picks are generally throwing more ints than tds out the gate. I’d like to see Minshew get the chances guys like Sam and Teddy got before I’d label him a career backup 

That's your opinion.. I think he got 2 years to prove he was the QB and played them into Lawrence .. Again he was undrafted for a reason.. I don't understand why you can't see the limitations in having a QB with below avg. Arm talent and way below avg. Physical attributes... This is way he wasn't as wanted by most teams and why he isn't worth what other QB are. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It will be really interesting to see how both sides handle this. I'm sure the team would love to get him signed to a 4 year deal based on his output so far and some potential factored in, i.e. something like a 4 year $30 million contract.  But I could see his agent telling him the best path is to take the one year offer, put up a big year next year and then really cash in. The team also has to keep in mind T-Mac's 2nd contract, which likely will happen after the 2027 season assuming he keeps improving as expected.  Even if we could get him on a budget 4 year deal for what he could become, the problem then becomes when he wants to re-negotiate in 2 years during the same summer we will extend T-Mac, and you don't want to spend that much on WRs in one offseason, just see the Bengals this last year. Taking everything into consideration, I'm thinking the 1 year deal and then getting him to sign a 4-5 year deal after hopefully say a 800ish yard season next year might be best for our cap situation and separate his and T-Mac's negotiation periods.
    • And yet jax made it no further than we did, and its very possible the Pats don't either. I think it speaks more to the overall down year for the nfl as far as having great/dominant teams, every team this year has fatal flaws that can be exploited 
    • Ehhh I agree the nfc is stronger this year but their really werent any truly dominant teams this year everyone is flawed, I think the narrative for the NFL this year will to try ahd force a Josh Allen SB win
×
×
  • Create New...