Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Pro Football Talk on Matt Rhule


Toker Smurf
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I've said it a few times recently. Both seasons look eeriely similar. Promising start followed by a faceplant a few games in and no ability to adapt and recover. I think they're right. It's just college coaches doing college coaching. They think they can simply out-execute everyone else. Scheming? Nah. We do what we do. We just have to execute better. That's probably why Rhule couldn't beat good college teams either. When he ran into more talented teams in college he lost. When he runs into teams that have a few games of film to study at the NFL level, he loses more often than not. Phil Snow has floated this turd. He's the only coach on this staff who has somewhat impressed me schematically.

 


I think Rhule’s strength is recruiting and motivating young college guys. He’s not a football tactician. 

He really should re-evaluate his strengths and stick to them. He’d be much happier.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, bigdog10 said:

There’s nothing short of a 5-0 finish that would want me to keep Rhule around. 

I definitely see your point of view. If you could convince me that a guy could come in and make this team immediately better with the current personnel I'd be all for terminating Rhule. Thing is, that would be hard to do without a solid QB on the roster. We also need to revamp the O-line. It's gonna be hard filling both of those holes with only 1 pick during the first two days of the 2022 draft. Free agency is an option to help us, but we can't assume that Carolina is going to be a desired destination for this year's class of free agents after the 2021 season.

This would be a much more desirable job for a new coach was coming in with 2nd and 3rd round choices intact. A new coach would literally be starting out with an immediate disadvantage. He'd have to be able to maximize the players contracted talent under contract for 2022 ...AND...hit on practically every day 3 draft choices to put us in a competitive situation.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, 4Corners said:

Yes. A complete shitshow on the offensive side of the ball and we have players like Terrance Marshall not even getting a jersey on Sundays. I think we can win Sunday and I think we might have a chance playing against TB at the end of the year because they will be resting people. I’ll also not be surprised if we go 0-5 to end the year. 

I'd say 9 out of 10 times when you fire a coordinator mid-season the team gets worse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

...Offense has its probs but they are right...we have too much talent to be performing this shtty.   9-3 wasn't out of the realm of possibility... Brady was too young to have that position... his play calling was immature, his plays where immature...he was immature.... rhule gambled and lost.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Pimpdaddy said:

...Offense has its probs but they are right...we have too much talent to be performing this shtty.   9-3 wasn't out of the realm of possibility... Brady was too young to have that position... his play calling was immature, his plays where immature...he was immature.... rhule gambled and lost.

Rhule's the one running an amatuer hour football team.   Can't let Joe Brady blind us from that primary issue. 

  • Pie 3
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We could lose the rest of our games and Rhule will still be coach next year. Tepper ain’t giving up on him after years. I didn’t want him in the first place but Tepper ain’t reading to admit he was dead wrong on this one. As fans get ready to watch this organization crumble tot the ground with Tepper as owner.

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The OP's video pretty much states what many here already know, Matt Rhule is in over his head and another year isn't going to change that.  If he is here in 2022, is there any doubt it will be another wasted season of Panthers football?

Dave Tepper took a chance on Matt and it didn't work out.  It happens.  However, Dave doesn't strike me as someone that would hesitate to terminate any employee once he's convinced that person is a detriment to the organization.

If Tepper's facial expressions during Panthers games are any indication... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I've said it a few times recently. Both seasons look eeriely similar. Promising start followed by a faceplant a few games in and no ability to adapt and recover. I think they're right. It's just college coaches doing college coaching. They think they can simply out-execute everyone else. Scheming? Nah. We do what we do. We just have to execute better. That's probably why Rhule couldn't beat good college teams either. When he ran into more talented teams in college he lost. When he runs into teams that have a few games of film to study at the NFL level, he loses more often than not. Phil Snow has floated this turd. He's the only coach on this staff who has somewhat impressed me schematically.

 

You nailed it on Snow carrying Rhule. If our offense wasn’t so bad the defense would look even better. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, BurnNChinn said:

We could lose the rest of our games and Rhule will still be coach next year. Tepper ain’t giving up on him after years. I didn’t want him in the first place but Tepper ain’t reading to admit he was dead wrong on this one. As fans get ready to watch this organization crumble tot the ground with Tepper as owner.

Joe Biden Reaction GIF by Election 2020

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...