Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Let's talk coaches


PanthersATL
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Mother Grabber said:

Rhule is not like Fox and Rivera. their faults ram along being uncreative, too conservative, and making decisions out of fear.

whatever you think of rhule, he’s shown he’s not afraid to make a move, be it with the roster or on the field.

 

 

 

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...
On 12/12/2021 at 11:36 PM, Cdparr7 said:

Hackett, Eberflus, Daboll

 

On 12/12/2021 at 11:45 PM, Shocker said:

If we make a move Nathaniel Hackett should definitely be a front runner

 

On 12/12/2021 at 11:49 PM, Mr. Scot said:

I'd call Daboll the most likely candidate, but to me Hackett is far and away the best candidate.

 

On 12/13/2021 at 12:06 AM, Mr. Scot said:

Hackett and his dad have connections going all the way back to Bill Walsh. He basically grew up around the NFL.

Click on the thread by Ricky Spanish that he linked above and you'll see plenty of info.

 

On 12/13/2021 at 9:11 AM, Mr. Scot said:

Nah, I think Hackett's gonna be really good.

Everywhere he's been, the offense has improved greatly.

You could actually get that same OC/DC combo under Nathaniel Hackett.

Pettine was the Packers DC not that long ago and Hamilton worked with Hackett's dad.

Mind you, I prefer Jim Schwartz or Gus Bradley as DC options. There are other good possibilities at OC as well.

Scot, dang bro....you were full on hackett.

Soooo much changed in less than a year......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Basbear said:

Scot, dang bro....you were full on hackett.

Soooo much changed in less than a year......

Yep, largely because of how I thought he'd handle things, especially staffing. But instead he went in the opposite direction of pretty much everything I expected him to do.

With the connections he had between himself and his dad, he could've built a world class staff, but he chose to go with a load of inexperienced or underexperienced options. Then to top it all off, rather than drafting a young signal caller he and Paton blew a huge wad on Wilson.

In essence, Hackett wound up being the head coaching version of David Tepper.

It's a reminder that coaching hires, just like quarterback draft picks, are unpredictable.

Edited by Mr. Scot
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Yep, largely because of how I thought he'd handle things, especially staffing. But instead he went in the opposite direction of pretty much everything I expected him to do.

With the connections he had between himself and his dad, he could've built a world class staff, but he chose to go with a load of inexperienced or underexperienced options. Then to top it all off, rather than drafting a young signal caller he and Paton blew a huge wad on Wilson.

In essence, Hackett wound up being the head coaching version of David Tepper.

It's a reminder that coaching hires, just like quarterback draft picks, are unpredictable.

No one can predict the future. nasa can in some ways tho...

Now you dont even want him as a OC either? 

Just like the baker deal here, it just didnt work out and ended with crashing burning fashion....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Basbear said:

No one can predict the future. nasa can in some ways tho...

Now you dont even want him as a OC either? 

Just like the baker deal here, it just didnt work out and ended with crashing burning fashion....

I'd say his best option is to go back to being a position coach and work his way back up.

From what I've been reading though, sounds like he'll be heading back to Green Bay in some capacity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yes, but Bryce Young is what amplifies that concern for me for a super green HC and OC.   it’s all and marriages by Tepper IMO.  Canales and the new OC probably would have a better time getting their O running with a vet QB that is a natural fit.   again, I’m not arguing Canales and Morgan should be catering to Bryce at this point.  Just pointing out how pointless drafting Bryce looks at this stage.  And I don’t disagree you either can play or can’t and the O is irrelevant at this level.   I mean fit matters at this level.  Everyone is too talented.  Fit makes or breaks careers. 
    • Excellent post, Jackie Lee.  I watched every second.
    • Yes you have said all of that as well. I was just saying having concerns about a one year OC transitioning to HC and trying to call plays like you have stated before as well implies he could be in over his head this first year. I’m not calling you out or anything. It’s a concern and I’m sure there will be some growing pains along the way. As for the Bryce thing, he is either a NFL QB or he isn’t. If he doesn’t look any better this year, then I think we simply move on and let Canales pick his guy. I think Beck has a big arm if that’s his type. Trying to build a very unique roster just to see if he can find success isn’t a good idea IMO. If he looks much better this year then sure you can cater a little more to his skillset. 
×
×
  • Create New...