Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

ESPN suggests 2 QBs for 2022 for the Panthers...

musicman

By musicman,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

onmyown Grand Master

onmyown

Posted
Posted

I don’t understand how you have a coach come in, choose their guy, backpedal and trade more resources for a new guy.

fuging no. You don’t let Rhule destroy future assets he shouldn’t have control over. That’s going to fug the panthers and new staff.

He chose Sam. He needs to continue with sam. Too fuging bad. This is what he wanted. And when he fails next year we can start again whole.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
FuFuLamePoo Mentor

FuFuLamePoo

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Wolfcop said:

If this team does not have another option at QB next year, ticket sales and TV ratings will be horrid. We need a QB that is at least not going to hand it to the other team several times every game. That crap got old real quick. 

Ticket sales will be fine, it’ll just be fans of other teams buying them all up

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ForJimmy Grand Master

ForJimmy

Posted
Posted
13 minutes ago, unicar15 said:

Gimme Jimmy G for a conditional pick with Armstead, best available OL for every pick of the draft, and lean on the D to win. 

Don’t give up anything for injury prone average Jimmy G. If we draft OL this year, we will need our picks to draft a QB next year. Just sign Mitch or Marriotta for cheap and have Cam be our Hill/back up QB for the year. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
mrcompletely11 Grand Master

mrcompletely11

Posted
Posted
27 minutes ago, Smithers said:

It’s past time for us to draft a QB in round 1.  Keep Cam and/or Sam around as our mediocre QB 1/2 until the rookie is ready.  Address OL through FA and any 2/3 round picks we can accumulate via trades 

We’ve tried to address the oline in free agency.  It doesn’t work and we are stuck with bad contracts.   You have to build the line through the draft.   This isn’t hard.  

  • Pie 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
mav1234 Grand Master

mav1234

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

This sounds about right. I expect Rhule to trade the farm for someone or roll with his boy Darnold.

God I hope he just sticks with Darnold.  Can't trust this guy to evaluate anything and we already are on the hook for Sammy D next year regardless.  Maybe if he's dumb enough to believe in Darnold he can stumble into building other parts of the team for our next HC.

The fewer assets we let Rhule deal the better...

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
PNW_PantherMan Grand Master

PNW_PantherMan

Posted
Posted

Giving up any draft resources for a QB like Jimmy G or Love would be awful.  Neither of those guys are good enough to win a championship, so what’s the point?  Jimmy is average and Love hasn’t shown any signs he’s an NFL starter.

Just sign some veteran QB for cheap and keep Cam next year.  Darnold is 18m no matter what, so he may as well be a backup on the roster next season.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
PNW_PantherMan Grand Master

PNW_PantherMan

Posted
Posted

Also I’d just like to add this.

If Green Bay is willing to trade Love for picks, it means he isn’t the answer.  If Love was showing signs he was the next great QB, Rodgers would have been shipped off to the 49ers or Rams this past offseason.

Instead, the Packers are hanging onto Rodgers for as long as he will stay there.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Smithers Grand Master

Smithers

Posted
Posted
52 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

We’ve tried to address the oline in free agency.  It doesn’t work and we are stuck with bad contracts.   You have to build the line through the draft.   This isn’t hard.  

uhhh - did you even read my post?  I clearly said build the OL through FA and the draft. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • MasterAwesome
      shough vs tmac off rookie of the year

      By MasterAwesome · Posted

      Ok fair to judge only his starts.  But you do acknowledge that going from "he's waaaay above league average in a number of categories" to "here's a single stat where he's above league average (not "waaaay") and another where he is exactly at the league average" is a pretty significant backpedal, no?  I'm guessing he's probably in the ~10th range for completion percentage too if we're only looking at starts (I'm too lazy to isolate his starts and do the calculations), so I'll grant you that one too.  But I don't think completion percentage is all that meaningful as a standalone stat if it isn't bolstered by good TD%, Y/A, etc. On that note, for how much people like posting Passing Charts in here (*cough* CRA) - if you peep Shough's passing charts, he hasn't completed a single 20+ yard pass in the past 3 games combined.  His last one was in Week 13 against the Dolphins, which was a single pass of 24 yards.  I just want to be consistent in how we apply our standards - I think it's always been warranted to criticize Bryce for it (even dating back to his rookie season), but do we suddenly not care about that with Shough? And yeah I did acknowledge that Saints' fans have reason to be excited about him and complimented his poise, which is giving my props.  Still not sure I agree that he looks better than a "ton" of QBs nor do I think you or anyone have really demonstrated that.  I think you are generally one of the more reasonable level-headed posters which is why I'm confused at what I consider to be rather hyperbolic language about Shough.
    • shaqattaq
      The Case for(or Against) Drafting/Signing a TE

      By shaqattaq · Posted

      I don't disagree with you, but want to point out that Tremble's strong suit has always been blocking. Case and point: on Horn's 25 yard run, he lays down not 1 but 2 nice blocks...and is looking for #3! https://www.panthers.com/video/jimmy-horn-jr-s-25-yard-run-gives-panthers-red-zone-access-on-first-drive
    • UnluckyforSome
      Derrick Brown Snubbed

      By UnluckyforSome · Posted

      It is a popularity contest.  The selection does have meaning though. It is also 1 of the criteria that is considered for the HOF. The game does not have any significance. The team hasn't been to the playoffs in nearly a decade. That's why they don't get primetime national coverage. To the victors go the spoils.
×
×
  • Create New...