Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

WFT to announce new name 2/2/22


Panthers Rhule
 Share

Recommended Posts

Washington Football Team to unveil new name and logo Feb. 2 (nfl.com)

Finally, the wait is almost over and we at least know that Football Team will NOT be the new name as well as Wolves nor Redwolves.

They have a hype video which I think offers a clue as to what the new name will be. 

I'm guessing that they will be known as the Washington Generals. (which I think is a good name for them)

Watch the video and tell us if you see the same clue and if you agree. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

They make it so hard on themselves. I thought of the Washington Reds with the Red Tail Hawk as the mascot last year. They wouldn't have had to change much. Just replace the man with the hawk, get rid of the "kins" in the mascot name.

Edited by KillerKat
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Waldo said:

They should have just kept it WTF. A team of Generals is very confusing. Does this promote the players to the same level as the coaches now? 

Generals isn't bad compared to a lot of the other options floated.  I honestly thought the WFT name was unique and they should have kept it.

  • Pie 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The entire OP is about the play calling and results and only mentioned T-Mac one time, in the sense of our offensive struggles only made me more frustrated about our #1 WR only getting a single 2nd half target in a game we were behind for the majority of it. How is that showing my true colors? It's way more of other people reading too much into it and thinking this is all and only about T-Mac for me, but it's not.  He just happens to be the player that I specifically was upset by his 2nd half usage, but it had nothing to do with my personal feelings towards him, but that he's our only legitimate WR and he had a single target in the 2nd half after going for 73 yards in the first. To me, that is a very legitimate play calling gripe, the win or particular player aside.
    • Dowdle looked great. Watching him made this game alot of fun.  
    • We’re stuck with Bryce for now.  He led TWO drives where we came from behind to take the lead. One of them was the winning drive and he threw the winning TD. Taken as a whole…he played at expectation after the 1st quarter. That’s not so bad under the circumstances.  We got the win. Maybe they’ll struggle to build on it but a win is a win. He drove the offense down and took the lead when it was needed. You can’t take that away from him.    We’re not changing QBs anytime soon.  Or owners.  So…when they win, we should take it at face value and give credit where it’s due.  Bryce came up big in clutch moments. You can’t take that away from him.
×
×
  • Create New...