Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

WFT to announce new name 2/2/22


Panthers Rhule
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, TheCasillas said:

Red wolves would have been really coool

Except that the only known red wolves left are in Eastern NC and there are more of them alive in captive protection than living in the wild. They are an endangered species and will likely be extinct within our lifetime.

https://weilerwoodsforwildlife.com/red-wolf-facts/

  • They are the most endangered wolf in the world. As of December 2021, there are less than 20 left in the wild.
  • They mate for life and have one litter of pups a year. Often one litter will help their parents care for the next, younger group of pups.
  • Red wolves are great parents and will even care for another wolf’s babies, given the chance.
  • Also, they are very shy and don’t want to be around you or your house. It is very rare you will ever encounter one.
  • Red wolves weigh between 45 and 80 pounds. They are smaller than a gray wolf but larger than a coyote.
  • All wolves, including red wolves, help keep coyotes out of the area where they live. They are the apex predator and will run out or kill coyotes entering their territories.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Panthers Rhule said:

Yes I agree and it's the most popular choice but legally they cannot because of copyrights from other teams. 

If the WFT wanted to be the Red Wolves, they’d pony up the money to acquire the rights to the name. The Cleveland Guardians (MLB) just did this with a Cleveland roller derby team which has been called the Guardians for years.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No, you're right. It doesn't mean you can't call out his flaws and poor play. But it also doesn't mean you can't admit when he plays well and shows improvement. Not you personally, just in general I mean.
    • I will say, I do think there's a version of Bryce that could be really successful as a high-volume passer in a spread-based offense built around quick throws and timing-based intermediate throws with deeper throws schemed up around them. I actually think the power run based offense we're running is a poor fit for Bryce as it requires him to play under center far more often. It's a very traditional offensive approach whereas I think a scheme that spreads defenses out and lets Bryce distribute the ball quickly with anticipation and accuracy is the sweet spot for him. The key, of course, is to find a way to run the ball efficiently out of those formations. Our personnel right now (backs and OL) aren't good fits for that style of offense and I'm not sure it's a scheme Dave Canales favors very much either.
    • I root for him, and I hope for the best, as does essentially everyone. But that doesn’t mean you can’t call out flaws and bad plays. And that’s what a lot of people get wrong.  I hope I’m wrong and that he continues to improve a lot, I just doubt it. But I’ve been wrong before 
×
×
  • Create New...