Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Per Ellis/Glazer Rhule not exactly “safe”


Cdparr7
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Verge said:

I have been sitting with this all day. What kind of logic is this? You have confidence in a head coach steering the future of your franchise solely based on if he can find an OC that you like? Otherwise you will fire him? That makes no sense. If this is your reasoning, just find a HC you do have confidence without these weird contingencies. Go hire Kellen Moore/Byron Leftwich/etc as HC if you want a great OC. This is seriously the dumbest thing that has come out of our owner, and that is saying a lot.

Tepper is a moron in terms of football thus far

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That type of stipulation makes no sense. You're telling me that Tepper will fire Rhule if the hire is not to his liking, which likely means having to find a new head coach well after everyone else has made their hires or make the new OC the new head coach by default?

I really hope this is false because the very idea is incredibly foolish.

 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, CarolinaNCSU said:

It's probably been said, but he's already hired one "rockstar" OC in Brady who was his scapegoat.

My question would be who defines "rockstar" in this case.

I know nobody trusts Rhule on that front, but if it's the same guy who called Marty Hurney "a great evaluator of college talent", is that really any better?

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Basically agree.  He is the one of that bunch that offers upgraded pass catching along with he is supposed to be kind of special.   Then you have the OL and the ideas that if they perform you can have JAG backs and still do well. So okay we could be fine.  But Brooks is important and to me that receiving element sets him apart.  So there sure is something riding on him.     What strikes me as incongruent is people over in Atlanta or those that follow them look at Penix with a third surgery and act like it is no big deal.      And we are on pins and needles over Brooks.  Either they should worry a lot more or we should worry a lot less.  
    • I usually go a game or two optimist over the consensus here but this is too early for me to say. I need to see some players on the field.  I am not feeling real optimistic though.  
    • Okay as a ‘take CJ’ fan I actually don’t obsess over CJ and Houston, contrary to the narrative.  But I thought I picked up some noise that his OL left a lot to be desired.    Not a single Beyce supporter would judge him harshly if he had a crappy OL. We all know that.    So be fair about it.  A QB needs to be protected.  Especially a guy that gets to his spot and wants to finish the play from there. Which CJ is.  
×
×
  • Create New...