Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Predict what week Rhule gets fired next season.

Sean Payton's Vicodin

By Sean Payton's Vicodin,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

YourLastThought Mentor

YourLastThought

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, Sean Payton's Vicodin said:

Rhule reminds me of Matt Patricia, who had 2 shitty years and was fired after the Thanksgiving the 3rd year. I don't think he lasts that long, I'm guessing by mid October he is gone after not winning a single game.

I bet our clown coach lasts the WHOLE damn season unfortunately.

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Mike in Raleigh said:

Someone needs to explain "sunk cost fallacy" to Tepper.

I honestly don't think it's a money thing. I think he's either a true believer (which is a horrifying thought given Rhule's blatant incompetence) or he knows he fuged this up royally but he's scared of fuging it up royally again because he really thought he nailed it the last time so he's just hiding in embarrassment hoping beyond hope that somehow it'll all just get better. Sadly in either case, Tepper is a trash owner.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
PNW_PantherMan Grand Master

PNW_PantherMan

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I honestly don't think it's a money thing. I think he's either a true believer (which is a horrifying thought given Rhule's blatant incompetence) or he knows he fuged this up royally but he's scared of fuging it up royally again because he really thought he nailed it the last time so he's just hiding in embarrassment hoping beyond hope that somehow it'll all just get better. Sadly in either case, Tepper is a trash owner.

He's gonna look even dumber next year.  Should have cut his losses when it became obvious.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

He's gonna look even dumber next year.  Should have cut his losses when it became obvious.

Yep. But he won't have the guts to hold a presser then either. If he was getting hammered by the press today why he was sticking with Rhule he would've been up there stammering and stuttering just like his clueless college coach was when asked about Darnold's option.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Mistuh Jones
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By Mistuh Jones · Posted

      This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • tukafan21
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...