Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

I have a question


ladypanther
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, frankw said:

Their idea of addressing the oline was signing two discarded backups on the first day of free agency who were two of the worst linemen in the league. They cared so much about the oline and the health of their quarterbacks they went all in on their secondary instead. I simply do not understand how anyone can take them at face value now. This should have happened last year. In truth it should have began in 2020. They get no pat on the back for singing this song now.

I was speculating as to what they were thinking based on a few crumbs of evidence--not endorsing their moves.  I hated the signings because it was Fits' first day in free agency and he signs 2 busts.

But I see your point.  Taking them at face value when they try to sugar coat dogshit is not wise.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The other part that does not seem to be getting addressed is that there was nothing done on offense to keep opposing defenses honest.   All year they stacked up and dared us to beat them throwing and our play calling could not seem to get any of our receivers open.  They talent is there, but the schemes sucked. Everyone knew what we were running and sat on our routes, which made the offensive line look worse.  We need an OC that understands how to design a game plan and how to adjust when the defense makes their adjustments.  We have not had any of that under Rhule as is evidenced by the terrible 3rd quarter offensive output.  1st drive of each game we did well.  Defense adjust and we suck the rest of the game. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, frankw said:

Yeah no poo it's almost like we should have done more early on before we reached desperation mode when it was clearly too late.

they signed two lineman to cheap deals in attempt to bridge it during an offseason we didnt have much cap space.  It didnt work. Luckily, they didnt put themselves in a situation where they are eating up cap and holding us back from signing some real talent this offseason. It was  a short term plan with little long term impact.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

I was speculating as to what they were thinking based on a few crumbs of evidence--not endorsing their moves.  I hated the signings because it was Fits' first day in free agency and he signs 2 busts.

But I see your point.  Taking them at face value when they try to sugar coat dogshit is not wise.

I quoted you by mistake so that's my flub. I just can't get on-board with singing anyone's praises after they've already made a giant mess and many of us saw the risks. I hope they truly learned and address this properly but they haven't earned the benefit of the doubt yet and they must drop this versatility mantra.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, ladypanther said:

So now...everyone (Panther staff) says we need to build the oline. Fitt says you build a team with the oline and dline.  What the heck were they doing last year?  Why did they just wake up and have this revelation?  Teddy was sacked a bunch. And why do you think he had all those short throwS?. Had to get the ball out quick. Anytime it was crunch time the oline crumbled. Then they went out and got a QB who was considered a failure who had played behind a terrible oline.  They did the same thing to him.  This just baffles me. Now they say it is important????

Blame deflection.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, frankw said:

I quoted you by mistake so that's my flub. I just can't get on-board with singing anyone's praises after they've already made a giant mess and many of us saw the risks. I hope they truly learned and address this properly but they haven't earned the benefit of the doubt yet and they must drop this versatility mantra.

Yes, I was simply trying to justify their rationale and why the OL sucks--what they might have been thinking--def not buying their snake oil sales pitch!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Growl said:

having a poor offensive line for a season is unfortunate but isn’t going to cost you your job

You can easily pass off a number of excuses to your boss

”well it was a rebuild”

”in the salary cap era it’s really hard for teams to field 22 great players”

“The Horn injury makes everything look worse”

but the kind of colossal and costly misjudgments they’ve made at the QB position can’t be excused or hidden or explained away, and in the NFL, you don’t usually get to make that mistake twice

“We signed two guys and it just didn’t work out”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Damage control from last years mess and mistakes.

It wouldn't matter because Sam is worse with time in the pocket. Even if they can vastly improve the Oline, which is in doubt, it's not fixing Sam. It was a terrible trade and a terrible idea to pick up the 5th year option. It's just more salesman BS. One just sounds better.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

they signed two lineman to cheap deals in attempt to bridge it during an offseason we didnt have much cap space.  It didnt work. Luckily, they didnt put themselves in a situation where they are eating up cap and holding us back from signing some real talent this offseason. It was  a short term plan with little long term impact.

You can't rationalize with internet mobs. They never listen nor take the time to think things through. They just ride the wave but I do appreciate your efforts. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

they signed two lineman to cheap deals in attempt to bridge it during an offseason we didnt have much cap space.  It didnt work. Luckily, they didnt put themselves in a situation where they are eating up cap and holding us back from signing some real talent this offseason. It was  a short term plan with little long term impact.

The problem is that short term plan that went up in flames was paired with giving up three draft picks and nearly 19 million guaranteed to a gamble at quarterback that has looked the same or worse as he did with the Jets. If we still had those picks and cap space you would see less objection.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, ladypanther said:

So now...everyone (Panther staff) says we need to build the oline. Fitt says you build a team with the oline and dline.  What the heck were they doing last year?  

Going after "versatility" because that's what Matt Rhule values in offensive linemen.

That plus long arms 😕

Edited by Mr. Scot
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TAMU had such a weird draft. Usually you'd be bragging your ass off about three DL drafted in the top two rounds except that the narrative around all three was about how badly they were misused by TAMU. LOL
    • Many Panthers fans are already excited about second-round selection Nic Scourton for a variety of reasons including but not limited to: the Panthers needed to recharge the position group, Scourton had a late first-round grade according to many (including the Panthers), and he fit this season's modus operandi of stopping the run now and forever. However, Scourton was seen early on as one of the top-3 EDGE guys in this class but fell due to not having quite the season at Texas A&M as he did prior at Purdue (his sophomore season). It's been revealed since then a few different things that speak to that dip in production... Texas A&M, for one, requires each player on their line to be able to hold two gaps. This also explains why we saw low production across the board from the other two TA&M prospects but were still being heavily touted. Scourton was also said to have bulked up to 280lbs in order to fulfill this role and noticeably suffered from it. He's expected to play this season with Carolina at 255 - 260 which is very different from most situations. In most situations, teams are wanting players to gain 15 - 30. Since Scourton is going to be playing at his Purdue weight, I thought it would make sense to dive more into that tape. Y'all... we might have gotten something special... Let's take a quick peek at the stats before we start drooling over some highlights. First, a summary of the last two seasons for Scourton: Second, the game splits: The first thing that pops up for me is how Scourton's sack numbers were cut in half his senior year. We've already pointed out issues with scheme that impacted the TA&M linemen from racking up numbers, but seeing the game splits it's clear that Scourton didn't exactly feast on inferior competition while at Purdue. He had two two-sack games (vs. Michigan (2023 - 2024 champs), Indiana) and a 10-tackle game (vs. Nebraska). I also see the 2024 games where he went up against two top-10 tackles (Will Campbell from LSU + Armand Membou from Missouri) that I watched leading up to the draft.  For those who just want a summary: Scourton looked elite at Purdue and is going to be rotating in often during his rookie campaign. I originally had him penciled in as the second-string, strong-side edge defender behind Clowney but I wouldn't be surprised to see the team have him and Pat Jones II moving around when they rotate in in order to find where Nic looks best. Here's a highlight reel to replace that Cialias you lost in your recliner tonight:   For those that want a little more: Below I'll be linking the linking the five games I've mentioned above. If you plan to watch all of them, I highly recommend going in the order listed as that will allow you to see him vs. Campbell and then Membou while dealing with the aforementioned things he dealt with at Texas A&M before seeing him look unstoppable in 2023 when he was allowed to play both at a comfortable weight and in a scheme that didn't require him two cover two gaps nearly every play. vs. Will Campbell (2024) vs. Armand Membou (2024) vs. Nebraska (2023) vs. Michigan (2023)   vs. Indiana (2023)  
    • Yea, i honestly think he had almost as much say as Dan.  One of the main reasons I think that is Eager has said before he was ever with the Panthers, that you trade away picks for a qb and for any other position you do pick swaps, and that's exactly what we did.
×
×
  • Create New...