Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

With your number 6 pick Daniel Jermiah mocks you...another corner


micnificent28
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

You are really digging deep for something that isn't there.

and you’re desperately trying to prop up a silly insult 

the team isn’t just disregarding value in their selections, no team is. But it’s not the silly black/white line you’re trying to portray it as.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/22/2022 at 2:45 PM, micnificent28 said:

Still couldn't see it... you still have former top 10 pick henderson... maybe bouye and pride(and that's if you lose Gilmore and jackson) a lot would have to go wrong for us to pick a corner as bad as the offense looked.

Keith Taylor has also looked really solid. I think we'll keep one of Gilmore or Jackson ultimately (even if I'd prefer to let both walk) and if that's the case, zero chance we take a corner, but even if we don't like you said we're looking pretty good at the position. Gotta go OL or QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, AU-panther said:

A CB sounds crazy but here is how it could happen.

Fans tend to think in terms of need and rank.  Basically, OT is our biggest need (non-QB) so we should take whatever OT is next on the list and available, in this case it would be OT3 on Daniel's list.

Teams tend to think in terms of grade.  Maybe we have a really high grade on OT1 and OT2 but a decent gap to OT3.  If OT1 and OT 2 go before us they might decide CB1 is a way better value.

In a perfect world you would trade down and line up value with need, but trading down isn't always easy.

I'm not saying its the right move, but i could see it happening. Same thing with the safety.  Any given year there is just really small group of players that teams consider elite prospects, its hard to pass on them.

Do you pass on a guy that you think can become the next Sean Taylor for an OT that think has a decent chance to be above average?  Here again, I'm not saying this is the correct way to draft, but its what happens.

 

 

 

 

6 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

Under Rhule, we have not drafted based on BPA, we drafted based on need, as determined by Rhule.

He has basically said as much. We don't do BPA.

 

49 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

You are really digging deep for something that isn't there.

You are the one that made an absolute statement in regard to a general statement I made about NFL teams and drafting.  An absolute statement that isn't true based on even your subsequent logic concerning the fact you said we would have drafted Sewell if available seeing how we didn't go to the next OT on our draft board.  Instead we went with a player that was probably rated higher.  So it wasn't absolute need, value factored in.

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, AU-panther said:

 

 

You are the one that made an absolute statement in regard to a general statement I made about NFL teams and drafting.  An absolute statement that isn't true based on even your subsequent logic concerning the fact you said we would have drafted Sewell if available seeing how we didn't go to the next OT on our draft board.  Instead we went with a player that was probably rated higher.  So it wasn't absolute need, value factored in.

I should probably have said "Rhule's version of need."

That is essentially what we have done. Definitely nothing close to BPA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

I should probably have said "Rhule's version of need."

That is essentially what we have done. Definitely nothing close to BPA.

Rhules version of need still doesn't change it.  If his version of need was a OT with Sewell and he drafted by his need he would have drafted the next OT on his list.

What you should have said is he draft one of the highest rated players on his board which also fills a need.  Which is pretty much what all teams do.  Nobody is absolute BPA and nobody is absolute need.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, AU-panther said:

Rhules version of need still doesn't change it.  If his version of need was a OT with Sewell and he drafted by his need he would have drafted the next OT on his list.

What you should have said is he draft one of the highest rated players on his board which also fills a need.  Which is pretty much what all teams do.  Nobody is absolute BPA and nobody is absolute need.

 

I don't even think he drafts the highest players on his board. You are telling me he had a fuging long snapper on his board?

No. He's just an impulsive idiot.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, kungfoodude said:

I don't even think he drafts the highest players on his board. You are telling me he had a fuging long snapper on his board?

No. He's just an impulsive idiot.

Actually, there is a very good chance the long snapper did have a relatively high-grade relative to his own position.  That doesn't take into positional value or anything but that is a different discussion.

Here is the deal.  No team is absolute BPA or absolute need on every pick.

My only point originally is there is small chance they could go into the draft with OT as their #1 need.  There is also a chance that they might have a really high grade on OT1 and OT2 but maybe not so much on OT3.

If OT1 and OT2 are off the board when we pick they might go a different direction, especially if one of the non-OTs that are available are extremely highly rated on their board, such as the safety or CB or one of the top 2 DEs.

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, AU-panther said:

Actually, there is a very good chance the long snapper did have a relatively high-grade relative to his own position.  That doesn't take into positional value or anything but that is a different discussion.

Here is the deal.  No team is absolute BPA or absolute need on every pick.

My only point originally is there is small chance they could go into the draft with OT as their #1 need.  There is also a chance that they might have a really high grade on OT1 and OT2 but maybe not so much on OT3.

If OT1 and OT2 are off the board when we pick they might go a different direction, especially if one of the non-OTs that are available are extremely highly rated on their board, such as the safety or CB or one of the top 2 DEs.

Yeah, there is for sure a chance they are wildly incompetent. It's been pretty evident. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, AU-panther said:

Rhules version of need still doesn't change it.  If his version of need was a OT with Sewell and he drafted by his need he would have drafted the next OT on his list.

What you should have said is he draft one of the highest rated players on his board which also fills a need.  Which is pretty much what all teams do.  Nobody is absolute BPA and nobody is absolute need.

 

He probably thought all the remaining tackles were really guards that had been playing out of position their entire college careers. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/23/2022 at 11:47 AM, kungfoodude said:

We could use a guy like Davis but passing up on elite OT/IOL for him would be upsetting.

Lots of problems to fix but little draft capital to do so. 

I was only suggesting it if the situation was as the other poster put forward, that we were going defense. I want offensive line in every round. 

  • Beer 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh, the high expectations after a draft. Keep your expectations low, people. Darin Gantt's latest "Ask The Old Guy" gives life to one of those lessons about pro football reality as a fan: "Rasheed Walker was a three-year starter at left tackle for the Packers, so Freeling is going to have to work. Hunter's got another big 'un in front of him in Bobby Brown III and a different kind of defensive tackle in Tershawn Wharton. Chris Brazzell II's got a lot of traffic at his position. Zakee Wheatley has to be better than the chronically underappreciated Nick Scott, and Sam Hecht is a fifth-round rookie at the hardest position on the line to play, who probably doesn't have immediate positional flexibility, and a solid free agent addition in Luke Fortner in front of him. "Fans generally love their draft class as soon as it arrives, because there is no evidence to the contrary yet. Once guys get on the field, the reality begins to creep in, and the seasoned among you remember that if you get three or four good players out of a draft, that was an amazing draft." https://www.panthers.com/news/ask-the-old-guy-things-looking-up-after-the-draft-monroe-freeling-luke-kuechly-bryce-young-derrick-brown Don't get crazy. Winning the draft (or the offseason BTW) on paper always leads to good feelings and great expectations, especially when you seemingly succeeded the season before, but let's remember that the Panthers are very much a work in progress. Team building takes time. If we get a couple of starters out of the draft, it's a good draft, but three or four would be an amazing draft, and anything more than that is actually sensational--even if entails a few multiple high end rotational players along with three starters. Moreover, kind of within that same vein, the coaches have to let the kids off the chain. Remember the coach-speak of past coaches about competition that is anything but because coaches have their notions about veteran experience? Not saying that they're necessarily wrong, but sometimes I think their reluctance to put the young guys out there is based somewhat in dogma or possibly fear because big stakes are on the line (e.g., their jobs). It can be frustrating to say the least, but the coaches are supposed to know best. Again, I say all of this so that we can remember to temper expectations and keep them within the realm of reality. It's like telling your mind to think of it as something akin to under-promising and over-delivering. Leave room to be pleasantly surprised for the best case scenario, but be cognizant that that rarely happens. I would think at this point, most of us should be able to recognize growth when we see it, and sometimes that growth doesn't manifest itself in the form of immediate supremacy, but a setting of the stage for long term dominance for years to come. It seems like we're on track for an emergence by 2028 or 2029. We still have huge questions, but by 2029, hopefully we will take our seat at the table of the perennial contenders in the NFL.  
    • You’re playing madden we’re talking real football stuff…. He does have you seen his special on internet he def thinks he’s getting paid 
    • Without the team having an identity kinda hard to predict what they value.  They either are really trying to build a balanced team, or preparing for another swing at qb if Bryce doesn’t pan out. Seems like we value the o line but the $ spent there has been underwhelming besides Lewis, you could say it’s because of injuries but still hasn’t been worth the investment. as already stated, the whole handling of Bryce young as a whole has been ass backwards, we spent the years we’re supposed to take advantage of having a qb with a lower cap hit, building the team up to be adequate. now It appears, key word appears, the saints have done it correctly, which is painful to even think about. Regardless, I hope the front office has paid attention to qb contracts recently, such as Tua, Kyler, Daniel jones(pre colts) and don’t settle for subpar qb play at franchise qb rates    
×
×
  • Create New...