Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Go Get Watson


Recommended Posts

Just now, USDepartmentOfSavagery said:

No way cotton balls Tepper didn’t watch divisional weekend. Ain’t winning poo in this league without a star at QB. Do what it takes. It’s time.
 

Let the dookie fly throughout this thread. 

Did you miss the game last night? Where is SFs QB?

Don’t have the money.

Really don’t have the trade capital.

Doubt we have his interest. 
 

Won’t allow us to fix the line.

 

  • Pie 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Wanderlai said:

He is the one X factor QB that can be had possibly. Watching Allen, Burrow, Mahomes be difference makers has me on board. Getting Watson May be all it takes to win the division if Tom and Payton retire. 

This is what people are not understanding. The time is now. Trade for Watson, get some FA olineman and go compete. 

  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, USDepartmentOfSavagery said:

I don’t care what other holes we have. Having a franchise QB fixes our biggest need. The rest will fall into place. Rams have been trading draft capital away for half a decade and are fine. I want to win a super bowl. I don’t care about the nuances of a process and future implications. 

That’s how you become the Lions and why Stafford got out of there.

Build the line, tweak the defense and draft a kid. You just have to have the coaching staff to do so.

Watson behind this OL would slightly better than Cam and Darnold this season. Maybe a game or two better.

  • Pie 2
  • Poo 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Ricky Spanish said:

Watson would not fix the poo-ton of issues that Matt Rhule has created for this team. Paying 3 first round picks for him would only hurt us more. 

We aren't a QB away from being good. We're a QB, OL, and entire coaching staff away. 

Besides all that, do people seriously believe Watson is gonna waive his no-trade clause to come play for this team under Matt Rhule?

If so, you might wanna adjust your meds.

Edited by Mr. Scot
  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I liked Sanders field reading abilities in general but his ceiling is fairly low and his shenanigans as a pro are, quite frankly, bizarre.  I don't think he is doing himself any favors by being a distraction while also being buried on the depth chart. Don't get me wrong, the media would attempt to make him a distraction regardless but it's not smart to feed into it when you aren't having a role at all. This can also be said of XL, BTW. We are no stranger to this. It's a lot easier to excuse Cam dressing like a deleted scene Harry Potter character at press conferences when he is looking like a man among boys on the football field. 
    • I hear Huddlers throwing things similar about Sanders whenever his name comes up, but to put it bluntly, we don't know that to be true. What we do know is that plenty of Browns fans thought that Sanders had the best camp out of the bunch, notwithstanding not being given the opportunity to play with the ones. What has been reported is that Dillon Gabriel is Stefanski's guy, and Andrew Berry thought that Sanders should be prioritized (even if it meant that he would eventually trade Sanders due to Sanders having more value). The fact that many Browns fans preferred (and prefer now) Sanders, and that there was a split---or difference of opinion between Stefanski and Berry, isn't really up for debate. It's true.  What this all means, at the end of the day, is that we don't know how Sanders compares to Hooker or anyone else because he really hasn't had an opportunity to play for whatever reasons. 
    • I don't think with a roster this bad we should be spamming picks at subpar QB's for development purposes. When the roster is a little more fleshed out, I would fully support that. Also, with our persistent evaluation problems, I can only imagine who we would have likely overdrafted in the past few years.
×
×
  • Create New...