Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Matt Rhule….


Panfan35
 Share

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, poundaway said:

 

'I'm comfortable with how we're doing it' - Zac Taylor (4-23-1)

Can we please get a coach like this... (thebengalsboard.com)

 

5 minutes ago, Tbe said:

Yeah, they hated him like we do Rhule…and for good reason.

Times change. Anything can happen with a good QB.

We are just talking heads, we have no idea how to run a football franchise. Its amazing how much productive time we waste on this message board to gripe about poo we know little to nothing about within the four walls of a franchise.

However, we do latch on to every little thing media and twitter says as they contort it and remove context. Then we run with it likes its truth and live with that. Then we bitch and complain until we are winning again, but even then we find the smallest thing to gripe about. This is our society today. Such a lovely time to live in.

  • Beer 4
  • The D 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

He won’t go to Michigan. We could never be so lucky….

Michigan alum would never buy in to Matt Rhule.  Michigan would want an attractive hire.   Matt Rhule is a small time HC whose stock has dropped.  His window for fooling a major college program was when he fleeced Tepper. 

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

I love how you ppl believe in your pitiful hearts that UM boosters are even going to consider hiring a Penn state alum.. smh

Notre Dame just hired an Ohio State coach who played at OSU more recently than Rhule did at PSU. 

Money talks, opportunities are limited, and people want to win. 
 

Michigan boosters would get over the whole “PSU alumni” thing real quick with a win over Ohio state. You are thinking way too much into this 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, CRA said:

Michigan alum would never buy in to Matt Rhule.  Michigan would want an attractive hire.   Matt Rhule is a small time HC whose stock has dropped.  His window for fooling a major college program was when he fleeced Tepper. 

Look at some of the coaches UM has hired. Personally, I think they could do better than Rhule but I believe most Michigan fans would be excited about this hire unless they live in Charlotte. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
    • adamantium? adam? adam thielen super bowl game winning catch ?
    • You're really gonna pass up the opportunity to make a joke about skidmarks in underwear here?  Alright fine.
×
×
  • Create New...