Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

“If you have a QB you like, You take a shot there”


ncfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

41 minutes ago, BrianS said:

If that's really his strategy then either they had some serious dirt on Fields or Fitts ain't callin' the shots.

Incidentally, I agree.  If you find a QB you believe in, you draft him if he's there.  Doesn't matter where you are in the draft.

I agree with everything Fitts said... and that you said. The Panthers passing on Fields and Slater to take a CB... yeah, that doesn't line up with what Fitts is saying here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, jayboogieman said:

If he's a yes man, then he only did what his boss wanted him to do. 🤷‍♂️

That said, I'm all for either cleaning house and starting completely over or letting Fitt have a go as the guy in charge. If Fitt takes over and crashes, it'll just add to the amusement I get from watching the Panthers burn. If he succeeds or Tepper cleans house, it'll restore some hope I have as a fan. I win either way. 😁

If he is a yes man then why the hell is everyone so hot to give him control? That's the hole in that logic, he is either bad at his job or a yes man. It's like no one learned from giving Rhule too much control when he wasn't an impressive candidate in the first place. 

I'm still hoping for a 2023 house cleaning too. Fitt has this year to do something impressive, last year was not very positive to me either way for Fitts. At this point Fitts has done nothing to indicate he is worth turning the team over to for even a year. 

I just want that hope back and I'm not putting it into Fitts or Rhule at this point, neither has earned in any way. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Waldo said:

If he is a yes man then why the hell is everyone so hot to give him control? That's the hole in that logic, he is either bad at his job or a yes man. It's like no one learned from giving Rhule too much control when he wasn't an impressive candidate in the first place. 

I'm still hoping for a 2023 house cleaning too. Fitt has this year to do something impressive, last year was not very positive to me either way for Fitts. At this point Fitts has done nothing to indicate he is worth turning the team over to for even a year. 

I just want that hope back and I'm not putting it into Fitts or Rhule at this point, neither has earned in any way. 

Exactly. I'd like to see Tepper clean house, but I don't think he will. If Rhule wins more than 5 games, odds are he's back another year. Heck, I think he'll be back anyway since Tepper hasn't shown to be a good owner.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, jayboogieman said:

Exactly. I'd like to see Tepper clean house, but I don't think he will. If Rhule wins more than 5 games, odds are he's back another year. Heck, I think he'll be back anyway since Tepper hasn't shown to be a good owner.

Hurney should have taught us all that being good at your job is not the most important part of being a long term GM, it's being invaluable to the owner that keeps you around mediocre to bad teams. That is what I don't want to see from Fitts but think is incoming after Rhule. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Why would they do that ?

To leap frog NYG and grab their favourite defensive player should they go with an OT at #4.

The specific picks mentioned mirror what the Eagles did when trading up to #6 in the last draft.

Edited by Icege
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wills, and Howell are going to make teams fall in love with them..

If Carson Strong Medicals come back Positive he could improve his rank as well..

But Wills is going to have ppl drooling like Zach Wilson did last year the way the ball explodes out of his hands... Its going to look different compared to everybody but Strong.. And even then it's still more explosive coming from a Ezekiel Elliott size athlete..

Then watching him play with actual NFL talent is going to be a revelation..

Edited by WOW!!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, AU-panther said:

Its a pretty simple concept and all he is doing is stating the obvious.

QBs are the most important position on the field, if you like one you take them.

If they like one will be determined by the scouting process.

 

Basically what several of us (including yourself) have been saying, while others are screaming you can’t do it without an OL… 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

Neither side is completely right... You need both to win a bowl..

No one is arguing that. The point is QB is the MOST important position in sports. If you don’t have one and one you like in available in the draft you draft him. Fix the OL with other picks/FA/next year. Priority one is getting your QB. If there isn’t one you like that’s a different story. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...