Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Getting 2013 QB draft class vibes


BurnNChinn
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, RJK said:

A QB at 6 basically makes the panthers the jets for the next 5 years 

How? Please elaborate.

Don't get me wrong, i have no fuging clue about QBs. I also have no fuging clue how messing up on one draft pick ruins your franchise for multiple years.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Luciu5 said:

How? Please elaborate.

Don't get me wrong, i have no fuging clue about QBs. I also have no fuging clue how messing up on one draft pick ruins your franchise for multiple years.

It's our only pick until the 4th round due to a bunch of gambles and trades Rhule seemed for the most part to be in control of. People are upset because we should be in year 3 of the rebuild and ready to take over the NFC South with Sean Payton and Tom Brady gone, the Falcons being in denial of their need to blow things up and start a rebuild. Instead we've been running in circles and basically looking like needing to do a full reset in 2023. It's more than just blowing one draft pick, it's possibly Rhule trying to save his job with another gamble to the detriment of the Panthers long term success

  • Pie 5
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, mc52beast said:

How does anyone know that Rhule is actually on a “hot seat?” Tepper has said nothing publicly about Rhule or the state of the Panthers. Rhule could get lucky, win 7 games and get a fourth year.

If Rhule doesn't pull a rabbit out of his ass this coming season (and is still retained in 2023) Tepper won't be able to show his face in Charlotte for all the verbal abuse he has coming his way (and deservedly so).

Community Boo GIF | Say google, Dumb and dumber, Best funny pictures

Edited by NanuqoftheNorth
  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Lance isn't gonna be available. We're probably gonna trade #6 for Jimmy G in route to our 4th straight 5 win season. 😂

He don’t want to come here either lol. Didn’t u see he wants to be traded to a contender, so that’s out. Which I don’t want him anyway 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Dude... you're just all over the place. You're the one who said T-Mac is better right now than Chark was at his best.
    • When I say "average NFL WR", for me, that's comparing him to all WRs in the league during that season/span of time.  He was of course better than those #4-6 WR's that can't even get on the field, but talent/ability wise, he probably wasn't any better than a #3 WR for most NFL teams, he just happened to be on one of the teams in 2019 with even worse WR's so he put up solid stats for the season. Here's more or less how I'm looking at it. Take T-Mac right now and Chark at his best, put them on every NFL team at this very moment, and where would they fall on the depth chart come Week 1 (basically, the teams that don't put the rookies at #1 to "make them earn it in camp" don't count, it's projecting week 1 depth charts). T-Mac would be at worst the #2 WR on the majority of teams this season, (hell, he's likely our #1 at this very moment right now already), peak Chark would not.  Yes, T-Mac still has to prove himself at this level, but his current ability, even as a rookie who hasn't played a snap yet, would have him above Chark on any team's week 1 depth chart. Because again, you can't just fall back on "well Chark had a 1,000 yard season" and use that as the reason for having him above T-Mac.  As he didn't have that 1k yards because he was a beast, it was because he was the only halfway decent receiving option on a bad team that was always losing and passing the ball (the Jags had the 7th worst scoring differential that season).
    • We clearly need to add a veteran stopgap at safety one way or the other.
×
×
  • Create New...