Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Riot: Panthers to take a major swing at QB?


WarPanthers89
 Share

Recommended Posts

I don't want to improve the QB position this year.  Why?  I don't want Rhule anywhere near our QB of the future.  His butt needs to be out the door before we get our franchise QB.  So yeah, Rhule rides with Darnold and PJ Walker this year, hopefully gets canned, and we start the REAL rebuild in 2023.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The best option is darnold goes out with an injury in week 3. Rhule desperately calls cam again to try and get him to come back. This time cam tells rhule to fug off and hangs up the phone. Rhule is forced to start PJ Walker, who is somehow still on the team. Panthers lose the next 4 games to fall to 1-6 on the year and we finish out the season with Wilks as interim coach. 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

Rhule is really an idiot if he does this.  Jimmy G couldn't get the 49ers a Lombardi and they are STACKED.  They have a good run game, George Kittle and Deebo Samuel.  They have a very talented defense.  But he still wasn't enough.

Why would anyone think Jimmy G is going to be the answer for a significantly worse roster?  We might as well trade for Jared Goff.

Person actually mentioned something I hadn't thought about regarding Garoppolo.

Panthers VP of Player Personnel Pat Stewart was part of the Patriots scouting group that drafted him.

That connection could make a difference, dependent of course on what Stewart thinks of Garoppolo now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Person actually mentioned something I hadn't thought about regarding Garoppolo.

Panthers VP of Player Personnel Pat Stewart was part of the Patriots scouting group that drafted him.

That connection could make a difference, dependent of course on what Stewart thinks of Garoppolo now.

"what Stewart thinks of Garoppolo now".... I hope it is based on reality and not some glorified opinion of what he could have been.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just don’t see how getting Jimmy is a good thing. Is he better than Sam, yes, but he’s not good enough to take this team on a playoff run. Giving up picks/players for him doesn’t make sense. Like I’ve said before, giving up picks needs to be for a player that can carry teams. Jimmy isn’t that. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, CanadianCat said:

One thing I think we can ALL agree on… the COMMANDERS is a stupid name 

when they first were announced, how do you think the Buffalo "Bills" fans felt?  The Packers (are we moving or gay?)? The Browns (Glad the owner was not named Bronkowski)?  the Saints  (dang that is a terrible football name)?  Steelers (after mill workers).  It does not matter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I've heard a hundred different huddlers say basically the same thing on this board pretty much since he bought the team.

Yet to see any of it actually play out in the real world.

I wasn’t saying, just showed a video. I don’t really believe it either. I need to see to believe. I would be a lot happier if we had a new coach!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not advocating for this, but here's one possible scenario...

Rhule has to take a big swing on QB or he's out.  Minnesota is currently 18m over the cap without a lot of flexibility.  Cousins is soaking up 45m in cap with 35 dead if he's cut.  They have to move him.

Panthers trade Darnold (18m cap) and Bouye for Cousins (35m cap) and a 5th.

Minnesota gets cap relief of around 15-20m or so and can use their #12 pick on a QB (remember this is a new regime with a hotshot offensive mind at the wheel).  They have several nice weapons and probably see Darnold as a cheaper bridge for their new draftee.

Panthers get a proven successful QB for one year.  They keep their pick so they can add some OL talent.  The extra 5th may help as well.  They will probably need to convert some base salary to bonus for Moton and Shaq and extend DJ in order to get extra cap, but those are fairly easy adjustments as these are long-term investments. 

Edited by grimesgoat
meant to say Minn. 18m over the cap
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • A lot of people have been slobbing all over this last draft but I hate the way that Fitterer/Morgan have built this offense since drafting Bryce. Anyone with eyes knew our IOL was crap but we didn't invest there and instead took project receivers and an injured RB. If you want a lesson in how build for your QB wrong, IMO, this was it. Draft him, protect him, THEN get him weapons. Its pretty much a rule, draft interior linemen, pay tackles. We're paying everyone. We had the opportunity to draft a center instead of Brooks, or perhaps instead of trading up for XL, trade back and take 2 guards/center. We could have paid Lewis and still drafted 2, but Hunt at 100m was just an overpay. And it's not like the guys many of us were begging us to draft were long shots. They're solid starters from day 1. Injuries happen. That's why all your starters can't be high value players. You need rookie contracts mixed in to be able to absorb those inevitable losses on the line. An offensive line playing an entire season together is an abnormality.  Factor into that also paying Moton 44m this offseason with a huge signing bonus when we didnt need to do right now to do him a "solid".  Now we have to sign Icky and possibly Bryce and it's a mess with more money tied up in the offense, inevitable cuts and dead cap coming. That's not even factoring in shifting Corbett to C last year after major injury to start at a position he's never played for an NFL season. It's all stuff that was foreseeable and pretty easily avoided.  The $$ and picks we've spent trying to surround Bryce outside of Tmac (Mitchell and Horn are TBD) have been used inefficiently IMO. Smarter drafting and FA with the line could have let us get more reliable weapons than XL and Sanders in FA. It might not be popular opinion, but I'll take a Bersin with hands that can get 6-8 85% of the time vs a big play XL with greasy fingers.  The part about hitting guys in stride was more about placement, which Bryce has struggled with. Obviously not every route is run to be hit in stride, but they do need to have the ball placed well to give the receivers a chance to do something after the catch. I just used Hill as an example because he's the biggest YAC threat I could think of over the past 5 years.   Receivers can feast on dink and dunk if it's schemed right. But to make it work, that vertical threat has to be there, if not the deep pass then the high speed routes that can spring someone for the huge YAC to keep the safeties from cheating into that 20 yard box all game.  I hope DC and Bryce can keep up what they did in the last game and it isnt just an Atlanta thing. But no matter what, I really want to see some better long term strategy coming from the FO. 
    • Eh. Don't speak it into existence lol. We've got enough on our plate just trying to overcome the bad juju of what has been our historically bad perfomances more often than not in primetime over the course of 30 years. We're overdue for a statement primetime game!
    • Passing chart had 3 over 20 I think. The Legette TD and another completion and an incompletion. All over 20 yards.  An incompletion at 19 or maybe 20 yards. So you could technically probably say 4 throws 20 or more.     That seems high to me compared to the norm. 45 throws and 10 YPA are both way high.   
×
×
  • Create New...