Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers still interested in Watson!


pantherj
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, BurnNChinn said:

Got this reply from Josh, he acts like Watson never got to point to say no.

It was reported that the Panthers requested to interview him so they could ask some questions and get some clarity on his situation.

The request was denied. Unclear whether the denial came from the Texans or Watson.

So yeah, we never got to the point of actual negotiation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ickmule said:

Give away the farm for a QB that can’t save the franchise alone. We already had a generational talent at QB without an OL.  Why replay that story ? It’ll just be ground hog day all over again.  

It will be an even worse situation with worse resources to build around. 

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, pantherj said:

We can restructure several players to free up a lot of cap space. Christensen at LT, and Moton at RT. Our center is not terrible. Deonte might be ready at RG next season, and guards in general are not that hard to acquire. 

Lol sorry but you are pretty delusional about the state of things, wanting so bad for things to not be as bad as they are.

Reality is, moves and trades last year.... particularly what it cost to get Sam, screwed our chances of getting Watson. The time to get him was last year....or this year if 1) we paid for Sam and 2) got an OT last year instead of one of what would be 50 CBs.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Ok--I have seen some sample items, and I would like to see something (if possible) measures on field intelligence--maybe how quickly you can grasp a playbook or absorb film session adjustments...Back when we had Morrison as team president and Hurney as GM, I offered to assess (as part of my research in education requirement at a University) emotional intelligence and learning styles of players to help coaches teach more effectively.  Morrison loved it and contacted me about it.  Hurney was not interested, and it fell through the cracks.  My pitch?  If only 50% of first-rounders become successful NFL players and that number drops significantly, can you tell me that you are effectively measuring talent?  Morrison thought it was a good point and wanted to do something that might improve long-term success rates--that would impact the cap management, etc.  Marty, according to Morrison, said he was not interested at this time and if so, he would want a football guy to do it.  (I told Morrison that I played in college and Hurney, a sports reporter at one time, did not. He told me that Hurney played as a Guard in college--who knew?) Any way, about that time, Morrison left (2017) and the idea was dropped.  I reached back out a year later or so to Marty was still not interested.  A few days later, his wife accused him of assault or something, so I dropped it.
    • Pretty sure they still do the Wonderlic they just don't publicly release the scores.
    • I just thought he was under the radar--but thanks for opening our eyes to him.  I think we should have better measures for intelligence--such as reaction time, angles, etc. Legette is raw as heck, for example, and his RAS was very high.  We used to do the Wonderlic (which was not great) but to know how effectively a player makes on field decisions would be great.  
×
×
  • Create New...