Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

One NFL GM's Top Ten Predictions


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

We need ATL to fall in love with Willis and a team who loves him more to jump them to 6. Denver, WSH, Minnesota or even Cleveland...need one of y'all to love Willis. 

Whether it's Cross, Penning, or Linderbaum, one seems likely to be left over in 10-14 range that would make us happy. Hell, even Pickett for us after a trade down if that's where the staff goes. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Tommy Jone said:

Well, better than Sewell IMO.  I never saw the attraction honestly.  Never stood out to me on tape.

I know it's only going into year 2, but he's trending bust IMO.

Nevermind, looks like he put it together around midseason last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

I don't want to see Ekwonu go right before us. Shades of Sewell in 2021.

And herbert in 2020.....you know if not for those meaningless late season wins, both very likely would have been panthers....tiresome, so tiresome....

I agree with this prediction *right now, panthers need to work out a deal with good buddy jets to get ahead of the giants whom pick right after panthers too. But Im in full Neal mode, then Ekwonu(won me over after weeks of ??), then trade down. Those are it. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Basbear said:

And herbert in 2020.....you know if not for those meaningless late season wins, both very likely would have been panthers....tiresome, so tiresome....

I agree with this prediction *right now, panthers need to work out a deal with good buddy jets to get ahead of the giants whom pick right after panthers too. But Im in full Neal mode, then Ekwonu(won me over after weeks of ??), then trade down. Those are it. 

I don't want to trade up. We don't have the luxury of spending those resources. If we can get a top 3 OT at 6, just do that. If not, explore trade down options. After all, we should be able to get a starting OL in the first round.

If a starting quality tackle is still available, don't trade down so far you miss on that.

  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, jayboogieman said:

But that is the plan. Gotta get more picks to churn the bottom of the roster. That or take Pickett at 6 since he went to Tepper's alma mater.

Yeah, hence why we suck so badly. Worry about churning the bottom of the roster when it doesn't basically look the same as the top of the roster.

Edited by kungfoodude
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Teams do some super stupid stuff with mid-fairly good QBs. I think they are just absolutely terrified they will be stuck with a QB that is not the quality of the QB they have now, even if its someone like Daniel Jones. Lots of trash QBs go in the first round. I encourage you to take a look at the sad, sad list of first round QBs in the last 15 years.  
    • No, it will be a raw 6'7" 17-year-old European who just played basketball for the first time in March and who the idiot GM "had first on our board." He'll play the whole G-League season, get in 42 games for the Hornets and average 1.1 ppg on 35% shooting. Been there, seen that.
    • We missed on Burns at his peak value. That’s the problem with trading for picks 2-3 years away (which people were convinced the Rams would suck by now and these would be higher picks btw). Each year away the pick is the further in value it drops. Fitt was clearly hired based on turning us around quickly. It’s one of the many reasons tanking isn’t really a thing as our player JJ is telling you in this original article. It would take the whole organization from the owners down admitting they aren’t winning soon with Burns and picks 2-3 years away having more value because that’s when we are still rebuilding. It would only make sense if Fitt had a longer leash and would more than likely be the ones making these picks anyway which you wouldn’t want. The question is would you rather have those Rams picks with the strong possibility of Fitt still being here or would you rather Fitt try to “win now” like he did and expedite his firing? Altering the timeline would affect more than just the Rams picks. 
×
×
  • Create New...