Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

QB situation getting worse for the Panthers.


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Name one Matt Rhule season with more than 5 wins. I'll wait.

He's had just two years man. Sure he sucks, but 7 out of 10 is freaking God awful. 

You do realize he had losing seasons 70 percent of his coaching career so far? Rhule sucks, but that's freaking trash. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don’t understand the continued hand wringing/threads ab us being screwed. No matter what we were likely last on the pecking order as far as desirable places free agent qbs would want to go. None of these trades has changed that imo. We suck all of us fans know I don’t know how any of these trades has made us suck even more we sucked worse than any other destination anyways.

And we should have been planning on drafting our guy regardless. Rodgers and Wilson were never coming here….we’ll have to be Watsons absolute only option for him to come here….Cousins Jimmy G Wentz Jameis don’t move the needle….let’s just take a swing on a rookie I have no issue giving him the Josh Rosen treatment when Rhule is fired.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, NCTHFL0567 said:

Rivera's had 7 losing seasons in his what? 10 years as coach? Yeah...............

Rhule has so many more winning seasons, playoff wins, SB appearances and coach of the year awards too...I might be wrong about that though lol.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, Waldo said:

At least a rookie only cost us 1 draft pick and can be moved on from the next year if needed...which is still a possibility with these people. 

Yep it’s the easiest, cheapest, lowest risk move we can make at the QB position. So naturally we will try something else…

Most fans will get excited about having a new young QB to develop. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, NCTHFL0567 said:

He's had just two years man. Sure he sucks, but 7 out of 10 is freaking God awful. 

You do realize he had losing seasons 70 percent of his coaching career so far? Rhule sucks, but that's freaking trash. 

Have you actually looked at their career winning percentage?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Texans would never trade Deshaun to a divisional rival. If Watson is playing next year, it will be for the Panthers, Seahawks or Buccaneers.

We also have a the better draft pick. If we want Willis, he's ours.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...