Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Pro bowl guard cut


Pazhoosier89
 Share

Recommended Posts

It is true that we are kind of a mess and have been for awhile. For most guys we will not be option #1. But we are an option and most guys will listen to our offers. If the player has some sort of connection here (a coach, or a player they have ties with) then we have a shot. That or we offer them above their expected pay grade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, grimesgoat said:

You're in your mid twenties.  You are offered millions of dollars to play a game you love in a fun city with thousands of beautiful southern women running around. 

You are about 3 hours from the beach. Taxes are reasonable.  The weather is nice 10 months out of the year.  The facilities are nice.

His teammates are important.  Does he already know guys on the team?  Anyone he played with in HS or college?  

Maybe he's from NC.  Maybe he played for a NC or SC school.  Maybe he has family here.

If he's got some pride - maybe he sees this as a challenge.  He wants to make a difference.

The coach may not be around past next year, but the next guy could be better. He's had multiple coaches in HS, college, NFL.  What's one more? The possibility the coach is a lame duck is probably 10th on his consideration list. 

That argument is a complete joke.  The only people that will not consider us are the ring-chasers.  Hopefully we're not interested in those guys anyway.

Funny that the coaches, who should technically be older and wiser, didn't see it your way.

Your argument really only works for players that don't have better opportunities somewhere else. And if they're at least half decent, chances are they will.

Will there be players that will sign here just for the money? Probably. Will they be all that good? Maybe, maybe not.

If they're at least decent, we might have to overpay and use up more cap room to keep them from going somewhere else.

That's not good team building.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Funny that the coaches, who should technically be older and wiser, didn't see it your way.

Your argument really only works for players that don't have better opportunities somewhere else. And if they're at least half decent, chances are they will.

Will there be players that will sign here just for the money? Probably. Will they be all that good? Maybe, maybe not.

If they're at least decent, we might have to overpay and use up more cap room to keep them from going somewhere else.

That's not good team building.

What you're failing to understand or acknowledge is that most NFL FA deals are short-term deals with little guaranteed money. Making the roster is what counts to actually collect on your contract. Carolina will have an open competitions at 4/5 OL positions as it stands now. Those players are not going to give a poo about "stability" if they're only on a one or two year deal. 

Edited by Smittymoose
  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Smittymoose said:

What you're failing to understand or acknowledge is that most NFL FA deals are short-term deals with little guaranteed money. Making the roster is what counts to actually collect on your contract. Carolina will have an open competitions at 4/5 OL positions as it stands now. Those players are not going to give a poo about "stability" if they're only on a one or two year deal. 

There are some players who won't, but believe it or not every NFL player is not necessarily Rod Tidwell.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Funny that the coaches, who should technically be older and wiser, didn't see it your way.

Your argument really only works for players that don't have better opportunities somewhere else. And if they're at least half decent, chances are they will.

Will there be players that will sign here just for the money? Probably. Will they be all that good? Maybe, maybe not.

If they're at least decent, we might have to overpay and use up more cap room to keep them from going somewhere else.

That's not good team building.

No gaslighting.  No one said anything about coaches.  We're talking about free agent players.

I think the key ingredients most of these 20-somethings are thinking about are money, opportunity to play, girls, friends/family/teammate relationships, fun things to do in town.

A coach being around more than a year is not on the radar.  And if the kid is good, he may think he can make a difference in how that coach's future plays out anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, grimesgoat said:

No gaslighting.  No one said anything about coaches.  We're talking about free agent players.

I think the key ingredients most of these 20-somethings are thinking about are money, opportunity to play, girls, friends/family/teammate relationships, fun things to do in town.

A coach being around more than a year is not on the radar.  And if the kid is good, he may think he can make a difference in how that coach's future plays out anyway.

Coach being a lame duck can be a risk because the next coach might not want you like this one did.

Will we be able to sign free agents? Sure. We might have to overpay for them though.

Will we be able to sign really good free agents? Eeehhh, maybe. You'd have to overpay even more for that though.

Attractive destinations often get players for less. Unattractive ones have to pay more, and as a consequence use up more of their salary cap.

Bottom line: While there are certainly players who will come here for one reason or another, we are not an attractive destination. And that makes the process of ruster building harder.

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, hepcat said:

I just don't see why vets like this would play for the Panthers unless their skills have deteriorated enough that the Panthers are one of the few teams bad enough where they'd get a starting job. A guy like this can probably get more money on a better team.

Because we can and would likely overpay and some guys value money over wins. IE: the 2 duds we signed last year at the start of free agency. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, grimesgoat said:

No gaslighting.  No one said anything about coaches.  We're talking about free agent players.

I think the key ingredients most of these 20-somethings are thinking about are money, opportunity to play, girls, friends/family/teammate relationships, fun things to do in town.

A coach being around more than a year is not on the radar.  And if the kid is good, he may think he can make a difference in how that coach's future plays out anyway.

Agreed. The two aren't really comparable. These coaches/assistants making lateral moves are making low six figures if that in many cases, and build their resumes based on the coaching tree they fall under. Meanwhile it doesn't matter nearly as much what coach a player plays for, and any decent FA is making millions per season. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For all of the people saying "why would anyone want to come here" ya'll do realize it's only 64 starting OG jobs available in the ENTIRE league?? With all the guards already in the league plus the draft coming the choices aren't as vast as they may seem. Unless you're a big money guy hitting free agency you don't get to pick and choose your destination to your liking if you want to play!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Waldo said:

Because we can and would likely overpay and some guys value money over wins. IE: the 2 duds we signed last year at the start of free agency. 

point taken, could be the case for some over the hill or overrated veterans with name brand recognition

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Have you seen the mock drafts lately?   Most of them have us taking a QB. Just because you aren't high on these QBs doesn't mean the Panthers or other teams aren't.   If you want me to be real I just think you a Tmac homer and all you care about is us drafting him. It's why you get so defensive when people mention other prospects.   Be open to other people's ideas. Nobody in this thread is saying anything bad about your boy Tmac. 
    • Oh good lord Interest doesn't mean interest in making a bad trade to take the player, that's why I had such a long post, to accurately describe why those are two different things, but you don't like to listen to that stuff.  Being interested in a player doesn't live in a vacuum. It's very simple... there isn't a #1 draft pick type of grade on any of these QB's, if there was, we'd just take them.  You can't bluff a pick everyone knows you won't make, and trying to trade the pick is the CLEAR signal that you're not taking the QB. Just because the Raiders would have interest, doesn't mean they're going to bail us out of a situation we don't want to be in, they'd be smart about it and just sit put, let us take a non QB as we'd be telling the world we're not taking one just by trying to trade the pick, and then they'd take him at #2 (either with their own pick or by trading less to get that one). Oh, and your point of "if nobody is willing to make the trade, you obviously just take the best QB" is quite literally the dumbest thing I've ever read on here. If nobody is willing to trade up to take the QB, then it's OBVIOUS that the QB isn't worth taking with that pick, so OBVIOUSLY taking the best QB there is just OBVIOUSLY stupid and a bad pick. The moral of it is if there is a QB worth taking, we're taking them and not making the trade.  If there isn't a QB worth taking there, nobody is trading up to #1 to take one, we just showed the NFL how bad of an idea that is 2 years ago, it's really not hard to see. You keep making up this mythical situation where there is a QB who has shown to be worth trading up to #1 for and we'll be able to leverage that into a trade.  But we're the most QB needy team in the league, if we end up with the #1 pick, either we are taking a QB #1 or no QB is going #1 unless we get VERY lucky and two teams in the Top 5 fall in love with one prospect and we can play them off each other and fleece one of them. But again, I can't see that happening, as if there was a QB worthy of that, we're just taking him ourselves.
    • Sanders is with Tom Brady brand and that's his mentor. The Raiders owner was with Sanders taking pics at a Vegas game together.   It doesn't take much to connect the dots that Vegas will be interested in Sanders as their franchise QB. Oh yeah and guess who hasa small ownership stake in the Raiders Tom Brady.   I guess this is just another made up Madden idea by me huh?
×
×
  • Create New...