Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Sign Kaepernick


NAS
 Share

Recommended Posts

Stop the Kaep. He's not looking anywhere near the shape he was. If we're moving on from Cam... which is very likely... there's no reason to bring in somebody from his era who was not nearly as succesful as him. I dont care about the politics. Kap wasnt like that when he took a knee. We're good over here. Enjoy the Nike deal and the Netflix money. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Zod said:

Zero harm in giving him a workout. Could be an amazing story if he does well.

Personally, I think it would make our franchise a media circus..  We don't need to be in anyone's spotlight till we're a good football team.   Some say all publicity is good..  I don't think being the NFL circus is  positive. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, OceanPanther said:

Personally, I think it would make our franchise a media circus..  We don't need to be in anyone's spotlight till we're a good football team.  Some say all publicity is good..  I don't think being the NFL circus is  positive. 

Unfortunately, I think David Tepper might be one of those people 😕

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Unfortunately, I think David Tepper might be one of those people 😕

In the end it doesn't really matter.  Kap doesn't want to play.  So even if we got down the road with him on the verge of signing him, his last card to play will be to ask for an astronomical dollar figure and blame us for not being serious when we turn it down.  Our name will get dragged thru the mud.  Good times.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Wes21 said:

In the end it doesn't really matter.  Kap doesn't want to play.  So even if we got down the road with him on the verge of signing him, his last card to play will be to ask for an astronomical dollar figure and blame us for not being serious when we turn it down.  Our name will get dragged thru the mud.  Good times.

I'm not thinking so much of Kaepernick as I am Watson.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Khyber53 said:

 

Would he take $10 million on a one year prove it deal? Put an option for a second and third season for us in the contract and we can trade him away if the opportunity presents itself and set those years at $20 million each.

 

10 mil? Maybe vet minimum, he ain't been playing for a while.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ickmule said:

That would be just as successful as signing Cam last season...... just sayin. Let's stop grasping at straws here and get a legit QB. 

Less successful, Kaep has never been a better QB than Cam. He was a one read or run QB who is now old and has not played football in what 5-6 years? 

Yea, hes not saving any team, he could not even do that when he was actually playing football.

Edited by PootieNunu
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • We’re in a pickle. My best hope is we protect him and can run the ball vs most Ds and the WRs are healthy so he has every chance to not look like what he looked like in too many games last year.   
    • I'm really not stressing about upgrading from Bryce. I'm frustrated with our inability (or refusal) to recognize overall bad QB performance and failure to seriously address the issue. QB is the most impactful position on the field, and we're not only settling for what we've been given to this point, but we've rewarded it with a fully guaranteed 5th year extension for a player that's never played 2 NFL franchise QB quality games back to back in 3 seasons. I can't understand how that's ok from a coach's or GM's viewpoint. Successful franchises don't do things like this. It just doesn't make sense.  We do not have a top half of the league QB right now. Since we don't have that player, we should be looking for him. Pickett isn't it. Grier isn't it. Bryce hasn't proven he is yet. Until you have that sure fire franchise QB, you keep looking. You're not consistently making the playoffs, a deep run, or a SB appearance without one.  What's the worst that could happen? We end up with 2 potential number 1 QBs? How horrible. 
    • Easy to understand Pickett, if this is anywhere close to on point. Canales wants to get as close to Bryce as he can- get the pace and timing in the throws as close a he can to Bryce. So the other players don’t have to adjust so much, to a new guy.       If Cam was the 1, he would look for a rocket arm.  But Bryce is the 1. Look for limited in the same way.  Low velocity, plenty of air under it, feels just like home when Picket comes in. And you have the guys on the second team not having such a radical adjustment (if they have to play) like with Dalton to Bryce.    Enter Grier. I guess we will collect those types.   
×
×
  • Create New...