Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bills were interested in CMC


Panthercougar68
 Share

Recommended Posts

Don't quote me on this but I feel like I remember reading the bills offered their 3rd and Beasley during the combine. Thats when the reports we wanted a 1st + player came from.

Also worth noting the media in NY are under the impression Saquon is only garnering interest for a conditional 5th that could turn into a 4th. 

Pretty far fall from grace.

Edited by SteveSmithTD89
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, @bonafidebanter said:

That tweet said that the Panthers don't want to move him. But, weren't the Panthers actively shopping him? 

It was reported before we were taking calls, never actively shopping him. Which makes sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, SteveSmithTD89 said:

Don't quote me on this but I feel like I remember reading the bills offered their 3rd and Beasley during the combine. Thats when the reports we wanted a 1st + player came from.

Also worth noting the media in NY are under the impression Saquon is only garnering interest for a conditional 5th that could turn into a 4th. 

Pretty far fall from grace.

RBs just don't hold their value, especially given their durability issues.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, SteveSmithTD89 said:

Don't quote me on this but I feel like I remember reading the bills offered their 3rd and Beasley during the combine. Thats when the reports we wanted a 1st + player came from.

Also worth noting the media in NY are under the impression Saquon is only garnering interest for a conditional 5th that could turn into a 4th. 

Pretty far fall from grace.

Yeah I remember WFNZ saying something about an offer of a 3, 5, and Beasley. 🤢

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, SteveSmithTD89 said:

Don't quote me on this but I feel like I remember reading the bills offered their 3rd and Beasley during the combine. Thats when the reports we wanted a 1st + player came from.

Also worth noting the media in NY are under the impression Saquon is only garnering interest for a conditional 5th that could turn into a 4th. 

Pretty far fall from grace.

I would have flown to charlotte and openly taken a dump on the steps of BOA and burned every piece of panthers I have if we would have traded cmc for Beasley and a 4th. Hell to the No

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SteveSmithTD89 said:

Don't quote me on this but I feel like I remember reading the bills offered their 3rd and Beasley during the combine. Thats when the reports we wanted a 1st + player came from.

Also worth noting the media in NY are under the impression Saquon is only garnering interest for a conditional 5th that could turn into a 4th. 

Pretty far fall from grace.

Hence why I said that CMC will never garner a 1st. Only teams like us view RB's as being very valuable.

They aren't.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SteveSmithTD89 said:

Don't quote me on this but I feel like I remember reading the bills offered their 3rd and Beasley during the combine. Thats when the reports we wanted a 1st + player came from.

Also worth noting the media in NY are under the impression Saquon is only garnering interest for a conditional 5th that could turn into a 4th. 

Pretty far fall from grace.

Not that far really... he was a one year wonder and hurt ever since. CMC has been healthier than him and that is saying a lot. 

Saquan was over hyped and RBs do not have high value.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • A winning record would be nice, but I still have us winning around the 6 to 8 game mark. Realistically we should beat the Jets and Saints, that gets us to 5 wins. After that, we have to face a lot of potential play off teams and our divisional opponents. I think we’ll win 1 or 2 of those games to take us to 6 or 7 wins, perhaps 8 wins if we can spring a further surprise.  Is that enough progress for head coach and QB? I’m not sure, it will depend on performances and output. That said, it’s nice to be back in a position where we are thinking about the play offs.
    • I would tend to agree about not falling into the trap and paying a below average QB, but sometimes situations can “force” a team to pay that QB. For example, if we play ourselves into a 9-8 like record, then what options will we have in the draft? Or do we avoid the draft and trade for or sign someone in free agency?  I’m not convinced by the 2026 QB draft class. There’s some intriguing prospects but no one that really screams “draft me”. I’m not sure we’ve got anyone really that stands out as a trade candidate or free agent signing. So although we might not want to commit a big money contract to Young, him playing well and showing progress might force the team’s hand. 
    • Realistically we would be looking at no more than a mid round pick for Dowdle or Chuba. Are we really that desperate for a mid round pick? Not really. I would much prefer us utilise the two RBs in a 1-2 punch similar to how we used D-Will and Stewart. After all, Bryce is not Drew Brees. He won’t throw for 300+ yards and carry the team consistently as a passer. So having a strong running game with a 1-2 punch will be beneficial to him, and it will also be beneficial to the RBs because we can spell them and not overwork them.
×
×
  • Create New...